My AI agent is putting apps in the App Store that are turning into revenue with no human involvement other than orchestrating the agent itself.
And she can do that 10000x over.
Still wrapping my mind around that.
@nicbstme I found the messaging interface is a strange unexpected unlock, before using it I said you can use the Claude / ChatGPT app on iOS how is this different but it is
I hadn’t heard of @Nanoclawsol before this, love the idea of skills instead of config and the claw rewriting itself based on your desired setup. super cool!
Bought a new Mac mini to properly tinker with claws over the weekend. The apple store person told me they are selling like hotcakes and everyone is confused :)
I'm definitely a bit sus'd to run OpenClaw specifically - giving my private data/keys to 400K lines of vibe coded monster that is being actively attacked at scale is not very appealing at all. Already seeing reports of exposed instances, RCE vulnerabilities, supply chain poisoning, malicious or compromised skills in the registry, it feels like a complete wild west and a security nightmare. But I do love the concept and I think that just like LLM agents were a new layer on top of LLMs, Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents, taking the orchestration, scheduling, context, tool calls and a kind of persistence to a next level.
Looking around, and given that the high level idea is clear, there are a lot of smaller Claws starting to pop out. For example, on a quick skim NanoClaw looks really interesting in that the core engine is ~4000 lines of code (fits into both my head and that of AI agents, so it feels manageable, auditable, flexible, etc.) and runs everything in containers by default. I also love their approach to configurability - it's not done via config files it's done via skills! For example, /add-telegram instructs your AI agent how to modify the actual code to integrate Telegram. I haven't come across this yet and it slightly blew my mind earlier today as a new, AI-enabled approach to preventing config mess and if-then-else monsters. Basically - the implied new meta is to write the most maximally forkable repo and then have skills that fork it into any desired more exotic configuration. Very cool.
Anyway there are many others - e.g. nanobot, zeroclaw, ironclaw, picoclaw (lol @ prefixes). There are also cloud-hosted alternatives but tbh I don't love these because it feels much harder to tinker with. In particular, local setup allows easy connection to home automation gadgets on the local network. And I don't know, there is something aesthetically pleasing about there being a physical device 'possessed' by a little ghost of a personal digital house elf.
Not 100% sure what my setup ends up looking like just yet but Claws are an awesome, exciting new layer of the AI stack.
3 months later:
- My website made $100,000+
- Received a $1M acquisition offer
- Helped 30 startups get acquired (~$300K)
Every startup begins as something that looks stupidly small.
I never got into crypto, even when so many friends were all in.
Over the last few weeks whenever I talk to people IRL I usually end up talking about AI. Then later I wonder if this is how all the crypto people felt when ICOs and NFTs were all the rage. Definitely believe something is happening
Today we're releasing Isaac 0: our first robot for the home.
And we made a short video for our first customers to share what it’s been like having one in their home 😊
I never got into crypto, even when so many friends were all in.
Over the last few weeks whenever I talk to people IRL I usually end up talking about AI. Then later I wonder if this is how all the crypto people felt when ICOs and NFTs were all the rage. Definitely believe something big is happening
@jackfriks @mikecallaghan I get the 'better for me'. In my case I think I'm more productive with Cursor than others because I have got comfortable with the Cursor UI (despite all their changes!). I've tried Claude Code, Codex and @opencode and I keep coming back to Cursor.