@JacobAShell No, and this proves that academia does not want its fraud to be detected and thus that it does not particularly care about the truth. They have to be forced from the outside, and any whistleblower is normally punished. Michael A. Bellesiles was another celebrated case.
@KyleUSMC0844@Pataramesh An Aframax tanker (which is the smaller size) is >750 ft long and >90 ft wide. It has a huge visual, IR, and EM signature, and Iran has direct line-of-sight. Hard to believe they can't hit them at will.
@BrandonWarmke How much? Entirely. Selective demand for rigor is the single most important technique for squashing unwanted lines of inquiry. It's used to pursue both grand politics (Arday) and petty politics (I want to reject this paper b/c I hate the author). There is no norm against it.
@calvinfroedge If Russian and Chinese vessels are exempt, then won't all the vessels promptly be Russian and Chinese? This isn't, like, a small incentive.
@mskochin Careerist bureaucrats love boring. If you want them gone, you have to take away what attracted them in the first place. Academia cannot offer money, status, and leisure. It cannot be a "good job."
@FamedCelebrity Thanks. Sorry to hear your story. I followed the Climate Audit blog long ago, until my bemusement hardened into anger and started dangerously towards hatred for the evil clowns perpetrating the fraud. I had to stop paying attention.
@JacobAShell It's hard to fix with better managerialism. "Quality-adjusted citations" looks better. This metric advantages networks of back-scratchers, though. Grant-getting? Backscratchers again.
@FamedCelebrity The most plausible explanation for that post is that the poster not only has never met anyone who is in academia for the right reasons but that he cannot imagine such a person. So, he just assumes that the soup of mediocrity he swims in is what excellence smells like.
@robbertleusink "People that defend contradictions will eventually stop defending the faith." Unless the faith contains contradictions, they pretty much have already stopped defending the faith. Or at least stopped defending it honestly.
@annework7@clashreport In the US at least, "militia" can be a good thing. The US Constitution, for example, speaks approvingly of the militia. It can mean a group of armed citizens defending their land.
@gbrew24 That isn't a lot clearer. What does it mean to "target the Saudi side?" Does it mean only Saudi flagged shipping? Does it mean only shipping visiting Saudi ports?
@merlinreedfield@phl43 It doesn't matter what's acceptable to Saudi and UAE. If it's true that Israel is calling the shots, the whole analysis of Trump's interests and internal mental states is irrelevant, and a completely different analysis is necessary.