Guess what? If you initiate violence against another peaceful individual -dont care what your political/social leanings are or theirs, you are in the wrong. #AndyNgo#Rightwing#Leftwing
@IngrahamAngle Do we have a beautiful country and a great amount freedom?-yeah But what silliness is this about the pledge. Pledging my allegiance to a piece of cloth and the govt is not in line with freedom at all. Plus you cant equate the pledge of allegiance to ones love of the country.
In the next 30 years, worldwide energy consumption is projected to increase by about 50%.
To reduce carbon emissions and meet the growing demand, we need nuclear, says @GoldsteinJoshua & @QvistStaffan in their book, "A Bright Future."
@nytimes
https://t.co/69pURVIL1G
Don't need every social thing to be inclusive. Perfectly fine to have an exclusive or limited personnel social activity. This goes for daily activities, sports, hobby groups, etc. Want to be inclusive - go to it, just don't force everyone else to be.
@IlhanMN As much as I would like my student debt canceled and besides the inflated tution costs- I took those loans out, so I and others individuals need to take the personal responsibility to pay them back.
I’m repulsed by most politicians, but some are worse than others. I made this video about the 2020 candidates' craziest (and best) ideas.
Who do you think is the biggest threat to liberty and prosperity?
If your argument against #farmers using #pesticides is that pesticide free is better, you should understand that:
1. Plants create their own natural pesticides.
2. If pesticides weren’t used in both conventional and organic we wouldn’t have enough food...people would starve.
David Bernhardt has been confirmed as the new Secretary of the @Interior. Here are 8 ideas he should consider as he formally takes the reins: https://t.co/nCT5Segzd2
@cmdrPorkchop@DougTheMoleman @soxfan01760 @SenSanders One option would be to have that in the risk assessment.What about this? What about that?- just throwing out a scary scenario does nothing. I can do the same- what about all the forest that is just sitting wild- some fire will burn thousands of acres and there will be a mad rush!
@misafrancoO Nope-all it says, is that a individual is not obligated to give you a service unless through mutual agreement. I want people to afford healthcare and lowering prices by allowing competition in all sectors of healthcare, insurance,doctors, hospitals, etc.
@sick_narlo @SenSanders Absolutely not-rights are not just whims to choose from. Rights are interactions between individuals in regard to obligations. If I am a service provider-I am under no obligation to provide you a service unless by mutual agreement (payment/charity/contract).
@cmdrPorkchop@DougTheMoleman @soxfan01760 @SenSanders Again no. Besides forest fire policies-there is no reason to think that property wouldn't have a fire dept on contract or real time monitoring of the location to take the appropriate actions.
@zenshatta@DougTheMoleman @soxfan01760 @SenSanders If we can potentially have a world that everyone has health care from the govt, why cant we have a world where there are voluntary transactions between individuals and groups to solve a issue? Voluntary peaceful transactions between people seems pretty realistic to me.
@nMasterclass Not quite- Id rather have that individual have the option of purchasing insulin from a cheaper provider, have access to charities to help pay for it, allow individual to buy from other countries/states, etc.. Govt restricts all these options.
@SenSanders I want healthcare for as many people as possible and the ability to obtain it. Govt has restricted this ability by creating monopolies for the health care industry, restricting supply of doctors/hospitals, etc- in turn making it more expensive.
@SenSanders The good intention of wanting to everyone to have health care is just fine. But health care is a service - One doesn't have the right to a service.