@LightningShade0 https://t.co/codDsdzrQD
i took on e6 first, i think not taking on e6 is a bit enginy, the position is still in humans terms totally crushing here is the game
@LingTolls A lot of secular people i know have this reverse view of Christians being puritanical joy kills. Like, no, they're just weird about their degeneracy, but hey god forgives.
just dont pay attention to the average lifestyle of a christian and reference it to the average atheist. The biggest zealots i know are addicted to kratom and nicotine whereas i dont even drink lmfao
Meganium hate is tied to the fact pokemon was a game played primarily by little boys. Little boys think spiky Gators and fire-bears are cooler than flower cucumber. This is because they are correct.
@EmmansZero@TheEfeDaniel@Foden47115 Any professional when choosing a line will look at the type of end game that results into them and then study how to play those end games if they like it. If they dont like the end game from the opening, they wont play it
@EmmansZero@TheEfeDaniel@Foden47115 its people who study openings incorrectly and think its just for a line whereas you can actually just practice the same positions in the same middle and end games over and over again and get really good at them. a lot of players are lazy and dogmatic about what matters
@TheEfeDaniel@Foden47115@EmmansZero It can teach you *non theoretical* end games. Non table base stuff. Like specifically in some of my openings the way to play is to sac the c pawn for activity down the files. Non theory position, just a general plan you must know.
@EmmansZero@TheEfeDaniel@Foden47115 Your ceiling gets capped if you refuse to study openings. Eventually you need to study them properly. All titled players know a fuckton of things. Ive seen Esserman play a 25 move theory game from a 1980s master game. If you dont mind if you stagnate, sure.