In this #StenhouseSummerSeries blog post, @DibenedittoMrs writes about how to create class values that build a community of care that centers students and their freedom within the classroom. #StenhousePub https://t.co/gP7qZwmFaW
Dim the lights and get ready to learn with these LFJ-approved films! Each would make an excellent choice for today’s Teach Truth Day of Action. #TeachTruth#FreedomtoLearn#DefendLGBTQrights https://t.co/mX4qmKL8n1
Instead, we have to decolonize and rematriate the classroom culture so Ss see "errors as information". It requires time to step back and look at what went right AND at what went wrong, make adjustments & try again. That is what productive struggle is all about. That's equity.
2/2 The beauty of the comically misnamed "Science of Reading" movement, though, is that its faith in systematic phonics instruction is impervious to contrary evidence. When it fails, that just proves those kids (a) have a learning disability, and (b) need even more phonics.
1/2 Early in her career, @regieroutman was required to teach reading via phonics drills and worksheets - "and lots of kids were failing to learn to read successfully." But "there was nothing wrong with their ability to learn; the problem was how we were teaching them."
@tressiemcphd Folks somehow surprised to hear of school book bannings, identity erasure, and the rise of bland anti-intellectual curricula fail to understand how the incessant calls for phonics instruction is rooted in racism, religiosity, and a belief in the literal interpretation of text.
What matters isn’t how well a teacher holds students’ attention; it's whether a teacher knows enough about how learning happens to stop being the center of attention
A loose consortium of conservatives, behaviorists, reporters, and politicians continues to peddle "Science of Reading" dogma that sounds plausible to the uninformed. I'm reposting this thread on what the evidence really says. Please speak out against this disinformation campaign.
1/8 More pushback from experts against the "#ScienceOfReading" propaganda campaign. From a Literacy Research Assn. report: "The idea that there is a 'settled science' that has determined the only approach to the teaching of reading is simply wrong": https://t.co/YmpAF964mr...
Love these @nerdybookclub picture book winners announced by @MrSchuReads! There are a couple I still need to read. #2022NERDIES
THE 2022 NERDIES: FICTION PICTURE BOOKS ANNOUNCED BY JOHN SCHU | Nerdy Book Club https://t.co/xtTdUnEu63
Think multiple-choice questions are straightforward? Think again!
This activity encourages Ss to roll the dice and have a collaborative discussion:
(Via @BASDLitCoaches and educator @LindsayWieand, inspiration from: https://t.co/mAq9kVGFVB)
#edchat#EduTwitter
PSA: A text is not inherently "decodable." Decodability is a property of the text ⭐️in relation to the reader⭐️. So, e.g., for a child who has learned the alphabet, sh, and "for," the page below is 100% decodable, but for a child who has only learned the alphabet, it's only 40%.
Check out this blog by Tim Shanahan. "Let’s not sink the boat in our zeal to make it look like we are doing a great job with phonics." https://t.co/4MwdGNvM6g
We’ve been talking about our multiple identities and how they show up in texts. Today, we tried our first MAKE: Make something that represents or shows your identity as a reader. What they made and said gave us full chills! @DibenedittoMrs (1/5 thread) #togetherwegrow@WISSIT_DC