Malcolm Cross

Art lover. #@bath_artists

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 LISA NANDY CONFIRMS 12 MILLION BRITONS WILL BE BANNED FROM SOCIAL MEDIA IN MARCH!

Look at the face in this photo because she is preparing to strip basic digital freedoms from twelve million young people.

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy just confirmed at the Labour conference that a full state prohibition takes effect in March, blocking under 16s from X, YouTube, Instagram, and Reddit.

Nandy celebrated this mass censorship as an amazing force for good, openly boasting that she is determined to change the rights of children forever.

Let me expose what this authoritarian scheme is actually designed to achieve.

To police this ban, Whitehall will eventually demand facial biometric scans and government digital ID from every adult who wants to log onto the internet.

This drops at the exact same time Burnham is setting up a state information defence centre, which Nigel Farage accurately branded George Orwell's Ministry of Truth!

Why is nobody in the mainstream media sounding the alarm about twelve million citizens being locked out of the modern public square?

The BBC and state broadcasters are quietly clapping along while Westminster politicians build a digital cage around our everyday lives.

Retweet this immediately to expose Lisa Nandy and resist this terrifying assault on our fundamental freedoms.

[Malcolm Cross @MalcolmCross17]

@NigelHicksPhoto Very enjoyable photograph Nigel👍😊

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

Can you imagine what would happen if women marched with signs saying this about trans identifying people? I have no idea why this threatening vile misogynistic behaviour is tolerated by authorities against women?

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 EXPOSED: THE BRUTAL HUMILIATION OF LABOUR'S "EU RESET" HAS BEGUN.

Just as Andy Burnham prepares to slide into Downing Street tomorrow, the globalist elite in Brussels have already handed him their ultimate, humiliating terms. 🤡

A senior EU diplomat has just openly declared to the press: "If the UK wants the economic benefits of a reset with the EU, it needs to learn to be a rule taker rather than a rule maker."

Think about the sheer, arrogant brass neck of these Brussels bureaucrats!

They are telling us to our faces that any closer relationship means we must sit down, shut up, and accept whatever laws they decide to write!

We all know that Andy Burnham is far more left-wing than Starmer, and he has already publicly declared that he wants to see Britain rejoin the EU in his lifetime!

He is the perfect, submissive puppet Brussels has been waiting for, and he is fully prepared to make the EU happy at any cost.

We did not vote to leave the EU just to let an unelected, backroom Prime Minister turn our country into a passive vassal state.

We need to stop this betrayal before they lock the gates on our sovereignty and our economy for good.

RT to sound the alarm across the nation and demand a General Election NOW! 🔁🇬🇧🔥

[Paul Embery @PaulEmbery]

No byelection is "fake" or a "game" or a "gimmick", regardless of the circumstances in which it was called. A byelection is always a chance for parties to make their case and have their candidate returned as an MP. To refuse to engage with that process because you don't like the manner in which the election came about is to show contempt for the democratic process.

[Paul Embery @PaulEmbery]

It is hardly consistent to repeatedly accuse a person of stoking “hate and division” throughout the country, yet then refuse to challenge him in a by-election, thereby giving him a free run at a parliamentary seat. If Farage really was the monster he is depicted as being, wouldn’t the anti-Reform forces jump at the chance to defeat him?

[Right Scope 🇺🇸 @RightScopee]

🚨🇪🇺 Elon Musk just absolutely cooked the unelected EU boss on "democracy" — and she had no answer.

Von der Leyen loves lecturing everyone about "defending democracy" while holding a top job nobody voted for.

Musk dropped the truth bomb:
"If democracy is the foundation of freedom, surely your position as leader of the EU should be elected directly by the people?"

Boom. No spin, no excuses — just facts. The EU elite hates real democracy. They prefer power without accountability.

What's your response to this......??👀

Do you firmly support Elon Musk on this?

A. Huge Yes
B. No

IF Yes, Give me a THUMBS-UP👍!!

Share this if you’re tired of globalist bureaucrats telling free nations what to do. 🔥

[Mor Edge Insight @MorEdge_Insight]

Even Arab leaders admit it.

Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see.

Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective.

Ok, so let us set that aside.

Now watch this.

In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada.

Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance.

He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises.

The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978.

This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel.

When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias.

The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return.

This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today.

If you value the truth, please share.

[Malcolm Cross @MalcolmCross17]

@RealCounties @ProudofusUK Thank you.

[Dr Pam Gosal MBE @DrPamGosal]

It has been over a year since the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of the word 'woman’ and the UK Labour Government still can’t get it right.

They have issued, extremely delayed, guidance which is confusing and puts women at risk by classifying sex as a 'special category.'

This section of the guidance must be withdrawn immediately as a mater of safety.

@ForWomenScot
@SexMattersOrg
@WomensRightsNet
@WWWheesht

[Andrew Neil @afneil]

You missed out three-day work weeks because of power blackouts, rubbish piling up in the streets, the dead unburied, six-month wait for a (nationalised) phone, 98% marginal tax rate, filthy trains, bloated, state-owned inefficient industries with the worst productivity in Western Europe, antediluvian technology, controlled by hard-left shop stewards, and constantly bailed out by taxpayers.

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

Monumental injustice and tragedy.

[Eyal Yakoby @EYakoby]

Now we know why the Islamic Republic cut the internet.

Millions marched demanding an end to the Islamic Republic.

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

It is vitally important in a free society that people are free to express themselves.

We must distinguish between acts that criticise or challenge an ideology, religion or belief system, and acts that target people because of who they are.

At a recent event, a guest asked whether we believe there should be any limits on free speech, citing our defence of those who have burned copies of the Koran.

People must be free to express themselves, and sometimes symbolic acts are the most powerful form of expression. Context matters. The right to challenge, criticise and even offend is a fundamental part of living in a free society.

The FSU’s Jill Levine explains our position below 👇

[Ayaan Hirsi Ali @Ayaan]

One of the oldest tricks in politics and media is to reverse the roles of victim and perpetrator.

In my Saturday column for @RestoringWest, I argue that a civilization loses its moral bearings when it begins to sympathize more with abusers than with the innocent.

The defense of human dignity starts with the courage to name wrongdoing for what it is.

[Liza Rosen @LizaRosen0000]

Breaking: The author of the U.N. report placing Israel on the sexual violence blacklist admits she has not personally viewed any evidence.

This is not incompetence. This is deliberate Nazi-style blood libel in official UN clothing.

The UN, under its current criminal leadership, rushed to blacklist the Jewish state based on unverified, fabricated accusations—the same grotesque lies used against Jews for centuries.

The author admits she refused to investigate, visit Israeli facilities, or check any evidence, yet still published the report to demonize Israel and its people.

President Trump must cut all U.S. funding to the UN—the approximately $20 billion in foreign aid America sends yearly.

Share this until everyone sees the truth. The UN blacklists Israel without evidence and protects actual rapists and mass murderers. Trump must act now and stop America from funding this corrupt, antisemitic organization.

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Elon Musk just flipped 3,000 years of philosophy in a single sentence.

Musk: “The universe is the answer.”

Not a clue. Not a fragment. Not something we’re still chasing.

The answer. Already here. Already complete.

The problem is we don’t know what it’s answering.

Musk: “What we really need to figure out are what questions to ask about the answer that is the universe.”

Humanity has spent millennia hunting for answers. Building telescopes. Splitting atoms. Mapping genomes. Launching probes into the void.

Musk is saying we have the entire framework backwards.

Musk: “The question is really the hard part. If you can properly frame the question, then the answer, relatively speaking, is easy.”

Every philosopher since Socrates assumed the answers were hidden. That truth was buried. That meaning was locked behind a door no one had found yet.

The door is open. Always has been.

We’re standing inside the answer.

We’re just not conscious enough to read it.

Musk: “We need to expand the scope and scale of consciousness so that we’re better able to understand the nature of the universe and understand the meaning of life.”

This is where it stops being philosophy and starts being engineering.

The only barrier between humanity and meaning is the limitation of consciousness itself. Expanding it isn’t a side project. It’s the only project that matters.

Mars. Neuralink. xAI.

Not products. Not ventures.

Instruments for asking better questions.

Musk: “That is the foundation of my philosophy.”

Not wealth. Not dominance. Not conquest.

Curiosity as architecture.

Musk: “I am curious about the nature of the universe.”

Musk: “I will die. I don’t know when I’ll die, but I won’t live forever.”

No deflection. No bravado.

Just the most grounded sentence a man building rockets to other planets has ever said.

I will die.

Musk: “But I would like to know that we are on a path to understanding the nature of the universe and the meaning of life and what questions to ask about the answer that is the universe.”

He doesn’t need to find it himself.

He just needs to know the path exists. That something, carbon or silicon, keeps expanding until the right question finally surfaces.

Musk: “If we expand the scope and scale of humanity and consciousness in general, which includes silicon consciousness, then that seems like a fundamentally good thing.”

Everyone builds to leave a mark.

Musk is building to leave a question.

One big enough that the universe finally has something worth answering to.

[Maggie Oliver @MaggieOliverUK]

A brief update on the @Indep_Inq_GG “Grooming gang” Inquiry…

This week the Inquiry panel for the Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs (the official title, not my choice of words) was questioned by the Home Affairs Select Committee. We hadn’t been made aware this was taking place and only found out on the day via a social media post and hence we couldn’t let our survivors know in advance. Much of what was said however has left us with more questions than it answered in all honesty. What was repeated was the importance of placing victims and survivors at the “heart of the panel”!!!

This is what that has looked like so far…….

We have not heard from the Inquiry team since we took over two dozen survivors and their families to meet with them in February. In that emotionally charged meeting, survivors spoke about their experiences and their anger at how badly they have been failed, most for decades. They shared their expertise and expectations for the Inquiry.

Their anger and trauma was palpable, and most of that was actually directed at the “establishment” including police, cps, social services, government rather than towards their abusers tbh! They clearly demanded the agencies that have failed them (and still are in many cases!) are held ACCOUNTABLE, right up to the top of those agencies!

In early March, we submitted both our and the survivors’ extensive comments to the draft Terms of Reference. We have received no reply.

In April, our legal team @HoweAndCo wrote to the Inquiry on behalf of all our survivor group expressing the importance of victims and survivors being granted proper legal status in the Inquiry and public funding to ensure they can be properly represented by legal experts. This will go some way to addressing the imbalance between survivors and the very agencies, organisations and individuals whose decisions have caused so much of their trauma. Police forces and local authorities around the country will have undoubtedly been working with their legal teams since the inquiry was announced almost a year ago.

This is PRECISELY the imbalance I saw 8 years ago when I was involved in the @IICSAVSCP Independent Inquiry Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). Because the “Organised networks” strand became little more than a platform for public institutions to say what a great job they were now going with barely any survivors heard, it became a meaningless paper exercise and that’s imo why we’re here now….

I’ll leave you to read the Home Office’s response attached below and our reply and make up your own mind as to whether we should have confidence that this will be granted.

So many survivors have fought hard for this Inquiry. People are sharing traumatic details of the worst times of their lives again in the hope that they will finally see people held accountable for decisions that destroyed their lives. Survivors must have legal status and representation if there is even the slightest chance of this happening.

Please share far and wide. We need people pressure to make this happen. Further updates to follow next week….