@DrDiGiorgio I would argue that having to charge patients more (premiums, co-pays, co-insurance, deductibles..) with a profit motive where insurers like UHC make BILLIONS/yr in *profit* is not “market efficiency” — it’s wealth transfer from Americans to the investor class. Happy to disagree!
@DrDiGiorgio Sure, of course. But your initial contention was that private insurance is more efficient with lower overhead as compared with government plans, and then you listed a bunch of tasks MDs/DOs have to do for every patient regardless of insurance, like enter CPT codes.
@DrDiGiorgio But that wasn’t your argument, right? It was about cost to administer? I’m not here to cheerlead CMS or ongoing payment cuts (I do advocacy for payment stabilization every year). I’m just saying private payors have inefficiencies and bureaucracies that govt run plans do not.
New low for @OptumRx — requiring #priorauth for TWO (2) tablets of Ativan for procedural anxiety for an upcoming brain MRI, in a patient who had radiation for a brain tumor.
TWO TABLETS.
We are pleased to announce that The Surgical Clinic has joined the Tennessee Oncology family!
To read more information, please click the link below:
https://t.co/niLvPQvViC
#TennesseeOncology#Community#TheSurgicalClnic
@StephanieEWeis1 Also, I’m not sure this is the same Dr. Weiss, but are you the program director at Fox Chase? I’m especially interested in hearing the views of those in charge of training our next generation of rad oncs.
These are important questions and I sincerely appreciate your thoughts!
Respectfully, this is a bad take.
Machines above capacity? Where? Again, show the data.
Asking students to match into RO, train 5y, then ‘make their own luck’ is a tough pitch without data.
We all need to do better for the future of RO.
@StephanieEWeis1 How would you suggest we do better? What is the right way to discuss job market and residency over-expansion concerns shared by many of our colleagues? If there isn’t data to discuss, how should we approach this important issue?
Dear @ASTRO_org and @ASTRO_Chair: any thoughts on today’s FTC ruling regarding non-competes?
This would be a great time for ASTRO to stand up and voice support for physicians and department staff.
Please let your members know where you stand on this important issue.
Thanks!
And for the record, I’m an @ASTRO_org (and @ACRORadOnc) volunteer. I just wish ASTRO would take a stronger stance. The workforce study was a start, but woefully inadequate.
Respectfully, this is a bad take.
Machines above capacity? Where? Again, show the data.
Asking students to match into RO, train 5y, then ‘make their own luck’ is a tough pitch without data.
We all need to do better for the future of RO.
This is the only question.
I’m not anti-expansion. I’m pro-data-driven decisions. And there isn’t any macro data to support the extent of expansion.
OA/Oligomets/skin(?) may help the trends but we can & should ask ‘leadership’ to be accountable for the problems they created.
@StrasserMD@lemmiwenks @gillies_mckenna Prove it. Fractions down. Courses down. Prove we actually need to train 190+ a year now vs 100-120 like we did 1996-2006.
Where's the data?
@JordanJ65544091 But saying “PE won’t be an issue” is kind of premature, right? FTC comments or not, the model your business proposes would allow for good things (rural coverage) as well as not-so-good things (consolidation, APP-managed clinics, decreased MD presence)
@StrasserMD@drbeckta This has not been and wont be an issue and the FTC has already requested input on this. It was also brought up at the E&C hearing last week.
https://t.co/4PJoiTmeVe