@unusual_whales This is your sign to look into #SPX6900
The strongest Movement Coin of this entire Crypto cycle.
Stop Trading and Believe in Something.
Before posting this video, I waited 14 hours for BBC and Al Jazeera to air it. They refused. Why? Because it shows Gazans furious at Hamas terrorists using their hospitals as shields, chanting loud and clear: “Hamas are terrorists.” Yes, that supports Trump’s plan to crush the Muslim Brotherhood forces in Gaza. And to the clueless protesters in New York and London.. do you still think you understand the Middle East? Think again. Israel and the Arab people now stand side by side against the rapists, the radicals, and the lies.
Charlie, are you drinking a Starbucks? Unfollowed. JUST KIDDING. I love how Charlie asks questions to get them to expose their uninformed opinions. It's genius.
All the hugs. 🫶
The hatch of the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft opened March 16 at 1:35 a.m. ET and the members of Crew-10 entered the @Space_Station with the rest of their excited Expedition 72 crew.
Not just those programs!
Democrats also use every other government money tool to attract and retain illegals, like unemployment insurance, disability insurance, tax rebates on nonexistent income, SBA loans, student loans, COVID payments, FEMA money for luxury hotels, etc, etc
Hello Mr. Legum,
You’ve built a website that relies on a specific interpretation of “potential” in the context of federal spending it. While @Oilfield_Rando mentioned this earlier, I went a step further and confirmed these definitions myself.
In the USASpending rpt.awards_search table, larger federal contracts often specify two key fields:
🔹 ordering_period_end_date (labeled as the “Potential End Date”)
🔹 base_and_all_options_value (labeled as the “Potential Award Value”)
Contrary to everyday usage of “potential” (which implies something uncertain or unlikely as your website suggests), “Potential Award Value” in these databases represents a contract’s maximum cost if all negotiated options are exercised. It is not a mere “possibility”; it’s the upper bound of contractual spending authority.
And in practice, contractors squeeze these agreements to their fullest extent, because why would they give up money?
To prove this point, I ran a SQL query to extract the first 60,000 contracts expiring in 2024 with outlays over $1 million and with no ordering period extending beyond 2024. Out of these awards, zero contracts had an outlay less than its Potential Award Value, and the vast majority vastly exceeded their Current Award Amount.
So, yes, I concur with @Oilfield_Rando - @DOGE, if anything, is underestimating their own savings.
Hello Mr. Legum,
You’ve built a website that relies on a specific interpretation of “potential” in the context of federal spending it. While @Oilfield_Rando mentioned this earlier, I went a step further and confirmed these definitions myself.
In the USASpending rpt.awards_search table, larger federal contracts often specify two key fields:
🔹 ordering_period_end_date (labeled as the “Potential End Date”)
🔹 base_and_all_options_value (labeled as the “Potential Award Value”)
Contrary to everyday usage of “potential” (which implies something uncertain or unlikely as your website suggests), “Potential Award Value” in these databases represents a contract’s maximum cost if all negotiated options are exercised. It is not a mere “possibility”; it’s the upper bound of contractual spending authority.
And in practice, contractors squeeze these agreements to their fullest extent, because why would they give up money?
To prove this point, I ran a SQL query to extract the first 60,000 contracts expiring in 2024 with outlays over $1 million and with no ordering period extending beyond 2024. Out of these awards, zero contracts had an outlay less than its Potential Award Value, and the vast majority vastly exceeded their Current Award Amount.
So, yes, I concur with @Oilfield_Rando - @DOGE, if anything, is underestimating their own savings.
🚨🚨🚨Huge news! Our awesome team @EPA just located BILLIONS of dollars worth of “gold bars” that the Biden Admin threw “off the titanic”.
Big update coming tomorrow
🚨 TONIGHT: we will confirm @TulsiGabbard as your Director of National Intelligence. Then, we'll immediately move to put Bobby on the clock and confirm him on Thurs. @Kash_Patel will get a @SenJudiciaryGOP vote on Thurs. As promised, I'll keep you updated best I can.