@LIGHTNING691alt@Acceletor4882 I think it really depends on the person. I’m not trynna say that rockstar is the goat but in terms of quality over quantity their games have aged amazingly. I think almost everyone can agree that they make games that leave substantial impact so one of the greats isn’t crazy imo.
@Razex3030@SBlue666@CentroLeaks Bro if you think the majority of people who play Pokémon like it because of the battle mechanics your actually dense. People like Pokémon because you get to catch cool imaginary animals in an imaginary world. That’s why legends is popular cus you get to walk around in a 3D world.
@TotallyNotMark I feel like it almost reminds of my one piece to some degree. Each phase of one piece has its own animation and art style and I almost think that when you world build at a very large scale it plays to your favor as you can describe the world through many different bodies.
@Gray_LZ @NotRealMusic What does this mean? I have no idea what “the language was employed” means. The way language is employed or delivered is through tone and diction. That is where the harshness comes from? Harshness = outcome of language delivery.
@Gray_LZ @NotRealMusic Isn’t that inherently subjective though? Clearly he doesn’t think that the language he used was very harsh and he still doesn’t think it’s that harsh. He mentions it in the beginning and clearly stands by the fact that he didn’t think it was that harsh which (it really wasn’t)
@Gray_LZ @NotRealMusic What do you mean by “semantics of the review”? He literally says, “It is totally up to you as the watcher to determine if that language is too harsh for a review”. The video is addressing the content and reasoning for a negative score. Isn’t the language he uses the semantics?