trying to make a sandbox mode of our project for various design partners
made a new deployment w/ sandbox env vars and subdomain but our partners say they can’t visit it
it’s bc vercel’s deployment protections block everyone else unless we pay $150/mo just to exclude the subdomain from these “protections”
hey @vercel i just tried to set up a sandbox deployment for our development partners
only to find that you block non-team-members from said deployment…
unless we pay an extra $150/mo
making us pay to remove a gatekeeping feature that’s forced on us seems rather predatory
AMD Senior AI Director confirms Claude has been nerfed. She analyzed Claude's session logs from Janurary to March:
> median thinking dropped from ~2,200 to ~600 chars
> API requests went up 80x from Feb to Mar. less thinking and failed attempts meaning more retries, burning more tokens, and spending more on tokens
> reads-per-edit dropped from 6.6x → 2.0x. model stops researching code before touching it.
> model tried to bail out or ask "should i continue" 173 times in 17 days (0 times before March 8).
> self-contradiction in reasoning ("oh wait, actually...") tripled.
> conventions like CLAUDE.md get ignored because there's less thinking budget to cross-check edits
> 5pm and 7pm PST are the worst hours, late night is significantly better. this means the thinking allocation is most likely GPU-load-sensitive.
hey just saw the axios supply chain attack… reminds me of another package that used to be stable (us)
thinking about how i’d still roll us back in a heartbeat… secure or not. what we had was a vulnerability that didn’t need fixing
you know you’re breaking the system when your competitors watch your demo day pitch from their HQ and email you about it
if you’re a founder and tired of shitty legacy treasury options, come talk to us
@abustamante@ycombinator@PalusFinance@Sam_Lushtak if we invested in fixed-rate MBS, 1000% agree. but we use floating-rate. fundamentally different. more info: https://t.co/VgW0nJgCeP
re: liquidity risk, this is meant for long-term reserves and not for day-to-day operational cash. super up front about this on our page!
@drbillsz@mil000 treasury yield isn’t a huge portion of their revenue, so it just isn’t a priority for them. as we all know most businesses only change their offerings when it profits them. classic corporate america 😍😍
@mil000 agency MBS are mathematically orders of magnitude safer and guaranteed by the federal government!
also you’d be surprised what risks your bank takes on right under your nose… take a look at the fund rho treasury uses and what it did in ~2022
@Duderichy just clarifying that we explicitly lay out the tradeoff of our product, which is exactly illiquidity (we are not same-day like a typical money market fund)
check out the comparison on our front page
@4n1rudh4@ycombinator@PalusFinance@Sam_Lushtak not at all! we actually specifically address this in one of our blog posts: https://t.co/xgaTpWDo4i
tl;dr we use agency MBS which is *very* different than the private-label MBS that blew up back then