For India, @TheEconomist opines that Sharia law should be enforced alongside any Indian uniform civil codes.
For the UK, @TheEconomist opines that enforcing Sharia law alongside any British uniform civil codes "poses problems."
Rules for thee, but not for me? 🤔
The debate around Newslaundry ethics is a reminder to all of us to remain humble. The problem begins precisely when you think you’re so much better than others that you can start being preacher & pulpit, doing long pieces on other newsrooms, based on exactly the sort of testimonies ( often unnamed) that are now challenging you. Anyone with a god complex will invariably be cut to size. This has literally nothing to do with media wars, or BJP vs Opposition. It’s the oldest proverb we learnt in nursery - those who live in glass houses should not throw stones at others. Yes, we are all imperfect, flawed, works in progress, making mistakes and trying to find our way through a changing world. Remaining grounded in that humility will go a long way. Nobody likes arrogance or humbug. Just my two bits. Sabki Dhulai se pehle apni bhi dhulai. Or recognise your obvious conflict of interest and likely doublespeak in commenting on others
Unbeliebable.
1. This is NOT the Gayatri Mantra. It is Shikshavalli, first chapter of Taittriya Upanishad.
2. The shlok is our civilisational Vedic code which prepares students for learning. This is not some petty religious claim that my God is better than yours.
Ignorance and bigotry in one tweet.
@Krishnavallabhi Hare Krishna!
Sorry but "Sarva Dharman Parityajya" does not mean any of those points that are mentioned above. Request you to please post actual original meaning and translation
Such things give opportunity to the haters to mock the entire Sanatan Dharma ecosystem.
The reason one sees Ganesh with DMT is because Ganesha is the being who sustains and supports the Ethereal Universe, without his support you are going nowhere in meditation :
Atharvashirsha says:
त्वं ब्रह्मा त्वं विष्णुस्त्वं
रुद्रस्त्वमिन्द्रस्त्वमग्निस्त्वं
वायुस्त्वं सूर्यस्त्वं चन्द्रमास्त्वं
ब्रह्म भूर्भुवस्सुवरोम् ॥६॥
Tvam Brahmaa Tvam Vissnnus-Tvam
Rudras-Tvam-Indras-Tvam-Agnis-Tvam
Vaayus-Tvam Suuryas-Tvam Candramaas-Tvam
Brahma Bhuur-Bhuvas-Suvar-Om ||6||
That’s why so many people of different religions worship Ganesha in India.
Jisko pata chal gaya, usko pata chal gaya!
A Muslim guy who never knew about Lord Ganesha experienced him in his DMT trip....he later during his india visit he first time saw lord Ganesha on shops and immediately recognised it from the dreams/trip state.
He says many people always experience Hindu deities in DMT trips.
DMT is a power hallucinogen you can take it externally but it is also produced by our own body during birth and deth and extreme meditation, people call the experience near deth experience.
Kuch log itne chut¡ya hai that they can't understand the meaning of, "agar kisi country ka future dekhn hai vhn ka youth dekho" bhench9d exactly see the same youth which is fighting for the future of this nation, just so that the future of this country can be better and bright.
Mesopotamia was never the cradle of civilisation. India was.
I spent forty years in international shipping, not academia. When I began researching the history of maritime trade, I had no orthodoxy to defend. I followed the evidence, and it kept arriving in the same place: the Indian subcontinent.
Nineteenth century archaeologists dug in Mesopotamia because the climate preserved artefacts, the biblical sources pointed them there, and the Ottomans allowed the excavations. That is the entire basis for the myth of Mesopotamia as "the cradle of civilisation."
Nobody applied the same rigour to India. Mohenjo-daro was not discovered until 1922. By then the narrative had already hardened.
What was actually there was the largest civilisation of the ancient world. Three hundred cities. Fifty thousand people in each, by 2600 BC. Two thirds of them stood on the banks of the Sarasvati, the central and greatest of the seven rivers described in the Rig Veda, flowing down from the Himalayas before the river vanished entirely by 1900 BC. The Vedic kings claimed territory stretching "sea to sea," from Afghanistan to Maharashtra, some 1.5 million square miles, against Egypt's 13,000. A dock at Lothal built to handle thirty ships of sixty tons, unmatched in Europe for four thousand years. When it was first excavated, it was recorded as a bathing pool.
When the scale became impossible to dismiss, the theory was not corrected. It was replaced with a story of pale-skinned nomads from the steppe who supposedly arrived around 1500 BC and brought civilisation with them. There is no evidence. The chronology doesn't work. The Vedas describe no invasion.
In 2019 a Harvard-led genetic study revived the claim, and the press reported it as confirmation. It was not. The same study found the builders of these cities were indigenous. The Sarasvati river that the Rig Veda described had already dried up before these newcomers arrived. What the study also found is that a small group of men, arriving after the Sarasvati had already dried up, interbred with the existing population and left a genetic signature. That is all.
So, where they chose to dig was mostly an accident of climate and access. The Aryan invasion theory was constructed because an Indian civilisation that owed nothing to Caucasians was a fact the late nineteenth century could not accommodate.
Link to full Substack essay with sources in the comments below.
Vijeta Dahiya has no problem opening his mouth to trash Hinduism.
But today, when an honest CJP worker called him out and asked, 'Why are you out here chilling while we're the ones getting beaten down by police batons?' he went completely silent.
This video needs to go viral everywhere so everyone sees his true colors.