@DelCrxpto@Trezor Dear @DelCrxpto, please stop spreading FUD, it does not make the situation better, quite the contrary. At this point, it's much bigger than brands and products; it is about the future of self-custody as a whole, so we do not end up where we began—with users funds on exchanges.
@TheHoodLabs@DelCrxpto@Trezor@Ledger This is FUD, the piece he is mentioning comes from a Public marketplace, not an authorized reseller. He is just lying
@DelCrxpto@Trezor There are zero cases of Trezor devices with spy implants. The picture above does not imply anything, as it's most probably only a plastic injection point from the manufacturer line. This in only about spreading misinformation and gaining an easy views.
@alex_bitcoin1m This is FUD. This device has been sold on a public marketplace from a random merchant, not through an official reseller. Please stop sharing misinformation
@Printer_Gobrrr This device has been bought through a public marketplace, where anybody can offer anything. Not through official reseller. Would you buy a new iPhone on Aliexpress from some weirdo merchant?
@seanclarke911 Bro you really compare Trezor bought from some public marketplace, to a major Entropy bug in the official firmware and to supply chain issue with an official reseller? Are you nuts?
@Jaspeeroo PSA: We are actively investigating the situation. We have no reports of tampered Trezors from CryptoBilis, and there is no indication that Trezor devices are affected. As a precaution, CryptoBilis is off our reseller list, and Trezor sales through them have stopped.
@crypto_irene@0xJohannes_ Due to the huge complexity of the attack and enginering behind it, Unlikely the attacker would target two different wallet manufactors.
https://t.co/gFWqj3FIE7
Purchased a @Trezor from cryptobills few months ago and gladly never funded it
Wondering why the exploit targeted only ledger users
Lesson learned
Stay safe