MizGWV

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 OMG, Stephen Miller just emotionally erupted on national TV

"KIDS ARE DEAD. The only place the parents can see their children is a cemetery, and YOU'RE gonna SIT OUT THIS ELECTION?!"

"They KNEW these children would get r*ped — AND THEY DIDN'T CARE."

"Kids were m*rdered by people who had NO RIGHT to be here. They didn't belong here. They aren't American. They have no right. They are trespassing in our country! And Biden and the Democrats and every Democrat in the House and Senate voted to let them in."

Every sane and patriotic American feels the pain in @StephenM's voice.

President Trump's border policies have likely saved HUNDREDS or THOUSANDS of American lives, not to mention the long-term quality of life improvements for American citizens

Don't forget that the ONLY WAY this can be maintained is by voting.

There are 2 choices and 2 CHOICES ALONE: having a country, or giving it away to r*pists and k*llers. VOTE NO MATTER WHAT.

[Michael Knowles @michaeljknowles]

If you’re shocked by the dismissed domestic violence allegation against the lone juror, just wait till you hear what Lindsay Clancy did.

[Pro America Politics @proamericapol]

A photo of the HOLDOUT juror has been released.

The mainstream media has done everything they can to destroy this man's life.

To make him out to be some sort of a monster.

In reality, he's a dedicated family man and a patriotic Republican.

The fact that he's a black man, and also a proud Republican makes them hate him even more.

This brave man stood up for three dead children and the entire left-wing ecosystem is attacking him because of it.

This is what real courage looks like. 👇

[Bethany Cherisse @BethanyCherisse]

When someone has had access to every possible mental health resource under the sun, genuinely are you even suggesting when you say 'they needed more help'? Like what else do you actually think should have even available.

More drugs? She had those.
More doctors? She had those.
Specialised mental health services? She had those.
Hospital inpatient stays? She had those.
Evaluations by psychiatric professionals? She had those.
Financial stability? She had that.
Premium health insurance? She had that.
Lengthy paid maternity leave? She had that.
A present work from home husband? She had that.
Professional childcare assistance? She had that.
Regular breaks from the kids? She had that.
Family support from her parents and in-laws? She had that.

WHAT. ELSE.

"ThE sYstEm fAiLed hEr'

Okay.

HOW.

Do you think some magical 14th medication, 6th primary mental health care professional, or 22nd medical intervention with a sprinkle of leeeedle more "understanding" would have, somehow, been the magical panacea?

You people are actually nuts.

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

We’ve never seen anything like this before. A man was conscripted into jury duty by the government. He performed his civic duty and followed his conscience, refusing to acquit a woman who confessed to systematically executing her three children. The defense attorney immediately launched a public smear campaign against the juror. Soon several other jurors joined the campaign. Then the media. Even the defense attorney’s wife has joined. Now they’re doxxing the man, digging into his past, contacting his family, showing up at his house. All of this both to punish him for refusing to go with their program, and to pollute any future jury pool by making it clear that anyone who votes to convict Clancy will have their life destroyed. It’s truly one of the most outrageously evil things we’ve ever seen from the Left, and that’s saying something. A direct assault on the integrity of our justice system. They are burning down every boundary and standard in their path. And doing it all for the sake of a child murdering psychopath. Unfathomable.

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

These juror interviews are extraordinary. They are admitting openly that they disregarded the law entirely for the sake of letting Clancy off the hook. There’s no other way to read it.

One juror says she originally wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that “Lindsay could get the help she needs.” That is a clear violation of the law. They were supposed to make a determination solely about guilt or innocence. They were not there to make sure anyone “gets help.”

Another juror says she voted not guilty because the prosecution never produced “character witnesses” proving Clancy was a “bad mother.” The problem is that A) killing your children IS definitive evidence that you’re a bad mother, and B) the prosecution would not have been allowed to call those kinds of witnesses. A witness solely testifying that Clancy was a bad mother would have been purely prejudicial. So this juror acquitted because the prosecution failed to provide evidence that they weren’t allowed to provide and which would have been irrelevant anyway. Extraordinary. This same juror even admitted that it was a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” The word vicious literally means “done maliciously and with intent.” So if that’s a fact then they were obligated to vote guilty. But they didn’t.

Meanwhile another juror swooned over the defense attorney’s “entertaining” demeanor. And another one said that all of the facts of the case — “everything,” her words — “proved” that Clancy “loved her children.” Apparently strangling your children to death, in this juror’s mind, does not at all call your love for them into question.

Just a collection of the most morally obtuse idiots ever assembled. Amazing.

[Thrilla the Gorilla @ThrillaRilla369]

This should make you angry.
This is Bonnie Pierce, a 38-year-old mother of three from St. Paul, Minnesota. Her house caught fire. She and two of her children escaped, then realized her toddler was still inside.
Bonnie went back in, found the child, but could not get out. She shielded the child with her body. She died from her burns. The child survived.
A GoFundMe for her family raised about $42,000.
By comparison, more than $1,000,000 was raised on GoFundMe for Lindsay Clancy, who was charged with killing her children.
It is a sad reflection of the society we have become.
RIP Bonnie.

[FeelGoodThoughts @feelgoodtale]

For the last 9-months, my wife, Brooklyn has been pregnant with a very sick baby boy. Three or four months ago, we learned that the baby had severe hydrocephalus. Back in the old days, hydrocephalus was called, 'water on the brain' - too much brain fluid. Ultimately, we were referred to Cincinnati Children's Hospital, where we were told by several of the most highly regarded fetal specialists in the country that his condition was dire. The baby's condition was 'off the charts bad'. It was so extreme that the specialists stopped measuring and monitoring his fluid level because, at that point, it didn't really matter. The MRI's were sickening to look at.

We were told, pointblank, that there was over a 90% chance that the baby would either die shortly after birth or have such severe cognitive impairments that any quality of life would be hard to imagine. We had a meeting with palliative care regarding the use of life sustaining measures and had detailed, awful, and emotional discussions about the ethics of when we might need to remove or cease such measures - which would result in the baby 'passing away peacefully'.

Brooklyn relocated to Cincinnati and lived in a hotel close to the hospital - in case she went into labor. I commuted back and forth. On July 8th, Brooklyn did indeed go into labor. Literally, 15 minutes before they wheeled her back to start the C-section, we had another meeting with doctors regarding the use of a breathing tube and at what point we might need to remove that tube and let the baby go to Heaven. Guess what? The baby came out crying - which was the sweetest sound I ever heard.

In a nutshell, Charlie Schnarr stayed in infant intensive care until yesterday - when we all came home. He seems to be a normal, beautiful baby doing all the things that babies do. He has mild ventricular enlargement, but we can deal with that with checkups.

How did this happen?!

The doctors said, 'We do not have and cannot come up with a medical explanation for what we've witnessed here'. Somehow his brain found a way to naturally clear the blockage or re-route the fluid that was causing the oppressive back up of brain fluid. During the last week, I heard the words, 'divine intervention' and 'miracle' more times than I could count. Nurses with decades of experience and esteemed, nationally admired doctors were flabbergasted but jubilant. Because of the domino effect of friends, family, clients, colleagues and even strangers praying and asking others to pray for us, I do not doubt that there were thousands of people praying for us.

I'm a practical person that certainly believes in science and medical technology, but I absolutely know, from the bottom of my heart, that God was involved in this. I give ALL of the credit and glory to Him. Prayer is positively powerful. God is real, and He still performs miracles."

📷: Nick Schnarr

[Bishop Robert Barron @BishopBarron]

Word has just come down that St. Paul’s Cathedral in London—the second most important church in the Anglican world—has imitated Canterbury Cathedral in permitting “raves,” nightclub-like entertainments, to take place in its confines.

The usual reasons for acquiescing to this have been trotted out: reaching out to the young, trying to get with the times, etc. But this development simply shows that the leadership of the Church of England has lost any sense of the crucial distinction between the sacred and the secular.

Across the centuries and across the cultures, our ancestors seem to have intuitively grasped the importance of this demarcation. Whereas the secular is the arena of ordinary experience and activity, the sacred is another realm, a different dimension.

Accordingly, in the properly sacred space, one is lifted out of the conventional and introduced into the numinous. This is why Christian cathedrals are filled with images of the saints and angels and why their interiors are meant first to disorient us and then to reorient us toward the divine.

It is also why, in the initiation rituals of primal peoples, a young person is purposely ripped out of the ordinary and introduced into the mythic and mystic dimension. And it is why, throughout the Bible, sacred spaces are carefully set apart from common spaces.

The contemporary West is, quite literally, the first culture in human history that is in danger of collapsing the sacred into the secular, or better, losing any sense of the difference between the two.

This is doing enormous damage, especially to young people, whose lives have been flattened into a preoccupation with money, worldly success, and material things.

The Church indeed should go out into the secular space to find those who have wandered away from God, but it should then lead those wanderers back to the holy.

Having “raves” in the nave of one of the most sacred spaces in the Christian world is, I’m sad to say, another sign of our pitiful surrender to ideological secularism.

[ᶠᴬᴺ Karoline Leavitt @kleavitt_0]

Liberal women say Charlie Kirk deserved to be killed because of the things he said.

Liberal women say Lindsay Clancy deserves to be free because she killed her children.

Liberal women are a cancer to society.

[mabbe8 @mabbe_8]

Lindsay Clancy suffering from postpartum psychosis eight months after giving birth, then killing her children because of it, would make her an extreme statistical outlier.

Postpartum psychosis occurs in roughly 1 to 2 of every 1,000 births and typically begins within the first few weeks after delivery and ends within three months. A new psychotic episode becomes exponentially rarer as the days and months pass after the first few weeks. Lindsay was eight months postpartum and asymptomatic for the first six months, so statistically speaking, there would be nil to zero chance of developing PPD or PPP.

The theory becomes even harder to reconcile with the evidence. We are supposed to believe Lindsay entered psychosis for precisely an 18-minute window she had intentionally created by sending Patrick to a restaurant whose travel time she had researched and then adding another errand. During that window, she allegedly heard a voice for the first and only time and methodically killed her three children. Seriously?

Then consider the phone call. Lindsay missed Patrick’s call but deliberately called him back. Ask yourself why. Was she reassuring him so he would not become concerned and return home sooner? That call is a critical part of the puzzle to show that Lindsay was conscious of her actions and taking steps to ensure her window of opportunity wasn't cut short. A jury could reasonably view it as evidence that she remained aware of time, circumstances, and the risk of interruption.

We are then asked to believe she emerged from this brief psychotic state without treatment or intervention.

Some social media commentators blame Remeron because psychosis is listed as an extremely rare adverse reaction. Yet Lindsay was also taking Seroquel, an antipsychotic. You cannot select one rare potential side effect, disregard everything pointing in the opposite direction, and declare the case solved.

Mental illness is not in dispute. Criminal responsibility is. The question was never whether Lindsay was suffering or whether psychosis was theoretically possible. It was whether her mental illness left her unable to understand what she was doing or that it was wrong. Based on the planning, timing, concealment, deliberate creation of a window of opportunity, and decision to return Patrick’s call, the evidence showed that Lindsay was well aware of her actions and understood the need to avoid interruption.

We are living in a timeline where social media tries defendants before the courts do, poisons jury pools, and turns human tragedy into clicks and cash. This culture of “trialtainment” is grotesque. It transforms murdered children into content, rewards the loudest and most sensational narratives, and denies victims and their families the true justice they deserve.

Tiktok narratives are not evidence and sympathy is not reasonable doubt. Jurors cannot replace the law with their feelings and emotions. When they do, the verdict no longer belongs to the evidence. It belongs to the algorithm.

[Rep. Nancy Mace @RepNancyMace]

Every serial killer in history has been mentally ill in some way, shape, or form. Doesn’t mean Ted Bundy or Jeffrey Dahmer were not guilty because of it. Same goes for Lindsay Clancy.

[Glenn Beck @glennbeck]

Let’s call this what it is, the defense attorney in the Lindsay Clancy trial just doxxed the lone member of the jury that led to this mistrial. By publicly pointing out that the single holdout in the 11-1 mistrial was one of only three men on the jury, he put a massive, dangerous target right on that man’s back. Why would a defense lawyer leak specific demographics about a lone holdout? Because it sends a chilling message to every single juror who will ever sit in that courtroom if they have a retrial:

“Align with us, or we will expose you to the mob.”

We are living in a terrifying time when the press and defense attorneys can weaponize public pressure against a lone citizen doing his civic duty. If the media outs this man, his safety is on their hands. Pray for that juror's safety.

[sasha_monet41 @Liquidlaug41]

Maybe they need to publicize the photos of the dead, strangled babies for the jury to see.
Clancy took a phone call from her husband during the murders when she sent him to the restaurant for dinner.
She spoke in a normal voice to him.
It was premeditated murder of the children

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

John Battaglia killed his 2 daughters in what forensic psychologists said was psychosis, stemming from a bipolar disorder

The jury deliberated for 19 minutes

He was executed in 2018

[Colette Harrington @sweetcarolinatv]

I have no sadness over Gloria Steinem’s death. What started out with burning bras (which I’m sure men loved) turned into rallies to kill your unborn child-up til the moment of birth. Rallies for men with Frankenstein surgery. Rallies to load children up on hormone drugs. Rallies for child killers, like Lindsay Clancy. It completely ignores where the real fight for women’s rights belongs. Women in eminent danger. Islamic women are beaten/stoned to death and little girls abused. Married at age 5. Instead of protecting these women and children, it’s ignored. Same with women and children trafficked. No one said anything about how Joe’s open borders gave the sex slave trade industry freedom to traffic in America. Today’s woke women’s movement is nothing more than a license to kill babies, destroy any protection for children, and not help women in REAL danger .

[Micki way @mickitiki]

3 precious lives were brutally taken by the one person that should have protected them. Have you noticed that the liberal women never mention their names? R.I.P.🙏Cora, Callan, and Dawson. 🙏🙏😢❤️

[kallie🇺🇸 @kallieswfla]

@JohnDePetroshow So keep posting .

[John DePetro Show @JohnDePetroshow]

I keep getting messages from Lindsay Clancy supporters telling me to stop posting pictures of the three Clancy children.