@defido@steipete@philippberner If you expect a "Claude-code-like-experience" with Codex, you will be disappointed. The tool is insanely good as is. Meaning you don't need 25 different frameworks to get going. It just understands, with little context. Also, it's insanely efficient - I've never hit compaction.
@dexhorthy How do we measure the value of skills? Like, it's a md with some prompts. Like how do we measure it's performance vs not having it, how much better is it, if at all? I have them setup, but it's not like I'm seeing a clear effect. Am I missing something?
@dexhorthy What's your opinion on Codex CLI? The DX compared to CC is not as good, but the accuracy in execution is incredible in my experience. Do you use it?
@kmelve@leerob Great read! One thing that is not mentioned, and missed in my view is that they were able to replace Sanity easy, and in no time...if that's not alarming, then I dont't know what is. Innovate or die?
@_bitcoinera @DavidOndrej1 This is bullshit - not because Opus is not good enough (it is), but because it tends to agree with everything, therefore making this post nonsensical.
@badlogicgames Totally agree with this - I have two MCP servers set up, but I rarely use them. I would go as far as saying that you don't even need sub-agents or any other package/tool/whatever that is designed to manage context.
@thsottiaux Tibo, do you mind elaborating on this?
"Based on evals, we continue to recommend using minimalist setups and keeping conversations small and targeted to get the best performance out of Codex."
How would you define 'minimalist setup'?
Awesome read btw!