I’m finally back with my project of having a personal website! I want mostly to talk about science to non-scientists !
In this post I briefly explain “how science is done.”
Feedbacks and advices are most welcome!
https://t.co/uDPHA9aBjD
Last week I said "goodbye" to the @_Nano_Bubbles project.
Here I summarize my contributions for science correction so far, practices that I will definetely always keep doing in my career.
So grateful for being a post-doctoral researcher in this project.
https://t.co/GEWewv6T6j
@OIntegridadEsp Thank you for sharing it. I want more and more people to be aware of those problems.
The Table in the screenshot was reproduced from https://t.co/oxwz6T9RkG
Opening the Symposium on Scientific Literature Decontamination by @gcabanac and Cyril Labbé, with a room full of sleuths and science critics, somewhere in Paris.
In this blog post, I described a bit of how our interdisciplinary project (@_Nano_Bubbles) studies the barriers to the correction of science, and how some of our subprojects connect.
https://t.co/wIrbjgyGxi
Entering the 3rd bubble of the @_Nano_Bubbles project:
We have just posted our first comment on PubPeer about the paradox of nanoparticles crossing (or not) the blood-brain barrier. 💊🚷🧠
https://t.co/DqOPHWtHEc
A week full of scientific discussions with the best team in the world comes to an end.
I got a lot of inspiration from the brainstorming sessions, the breakout sessions and the individual advice that could easily come from a walk in nature.
Thanks to the whole @_Nano_Bubbles !
I had the pleasure of attending the 5th meeting of @RNA_CNRS. The research field is “out of my bubble”. I presented a poster about our post-publication peer review initiative, focusing on the articles we commented dealing with the intracellular detection of RNA. @_Nano_Bubbles
The Problematic Paper Screener is featured in @ScienceMagazine today ☺️, as we travel to #WCRI2024 in Athens 🇬🇷 w/ @alexcla99 https://t.co/JzaeUDbhGV HT @cathleenogrady
📑 Our ‘sneaked references’ preprint https://t.co/Z6DfvOEGuk that @RetractionWatch covered https://t.co/w5z8L0ywOO now accepted in @JASIST: https://t.co/m82ksuvNFM. BTS: I commented on May 2022 a ‘tortured’ paper downloaded 62 times and cited 107 times…😵 https://t.co/2ptGeHFkUt
Our first article on post-publication peer review has just been out! 🎉
Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions - now published in Materials Horizons @_Nano_Bubbles Maha Said @Mustafagharib Raphael Lévy, @FedericoBoem
https://t.co/EuJJfvXuZe