Austrian president said all women should wear a hijab to show solidarity with Muslims:
“With increasing Islamophobia, we might have to ask ALL women to wear a headscarf to show solidarity with those who do so for religious reasons.”
This is mental illness.
Lara Logan just broke down a pattern that hits different once you see it.
They keep creating problems that can never actually be solved: racism that’s “unconscious,” masculinity as inherently toxic, CO2 as the enemy even though we breathe it out, and differences turned into permanent grievances.
The goal? Issues without end. Skin color can’t change. Breathing can’t stop. Masculine instinct doesn’t vanish. So the problems stay… and so does the control.
It’s not about fixing anything. It’s about keeping the fight alive so we stay divided and easier to manage.
Once you spot the tactic, everything gets clearer.
What “unsolvable problem” have you noticed getting pushed the hardest lately?
Most people don't know this, but Salvador Dalí built his entire career on tapping into his unconscious mind on purpose.
Dalí's most famous trick was a micro-nap he called "slumber with a key." He'd sit in a heavy Spanish-style armchair, head tilted back against the leather, both arms hanging completely limp off the armrests, and in his left hand he'd hold a heavy metal key pinched lightly between his thumb and forefinger.
Directly under that hand, on the floor, he'd place an upside-down plate. He'd then let himself drift into sleep. The instant he actually fell asleep, his muscles would go slack, the key would slip out of his fingers, hit the upside-down plate, and the clang would jolt him awake.
The whole nap was meant to last less than a quarter of a second. He called that half-second window the "taut and invisible wire which separates sleeping from waking," and he'd immediately sketch the hallucinations he saw in that flash.
The melting clocks, the elephants on stilts, the burning giraffes, a lot of that came straight out of those quarter-second naps. He picked the trick up from Capuchin monks and wrote it down as one of his "50 Secrets of Magic Craftsmanship."
An Bord der "Titanic" befanden sich (ohne Besatzung) 1300 Passagiere. Von 412 Frauen überlebten 304 (74%), von 112 Kindern 56 (50%), von 776 Männern 128 (16%).
Das nennen sie "Patriarchat".
Nun mag jeder sich ausmalen, wie das Geschlechterverhältnis der Toten ausgesehen hätte, wären an Bord keine Europäer und Amerikaner gewesen, sondern Menschen aus anderen Kulturkreisen.
@objekt_1@maxmannhart Argentinien zuletzt. Nur ein Beispiel von vielen!
Andersherum sehen wir ständig wie linke Politik ein Land nach dem nächsten in den Ruin treibt.
These two paragraphs of my verdict are crucial for everyone to read and understand.
"Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” 1⃣
"For Van Langenhove to have committed a crime, it is not necessary for him to have incited concrete acts of hate or violence. It suffices that others are incited to take on a general attitude of intolerance or disapproval regarding a group protected under the criteria of the Anti-Racism Law." 2⃣
This means you can go to jail for "inciting hatred" even if your statements were 100% factual (see 1⃣) and even if you did NOT incite concrete acts of hate (see 2⃣).
The benchmark of "inciting hatred" , a crime punishable by prison, is thus "saying something that has the potential of inciting someone to have a general attitude of disapproval regarding a protected group". This means literally any criticism of mass migration is now a punishable offence. If you cite a statistic, and someone could potentially think less of a protected group (like migrants) because of it, you can be jailed.
The craziest part is that there is no defence possible against this. I brought the scientific studies that I cited to court, but the judge didn't care 1⃣. I also proved that the hundreds of students present at the lecture included students of all different political affiliations, and everyone was able to voice their opinion or ask questions. The lecture went very calmly, so obviously nobody was incited to hatred. But this too did not matter 2⃣, because if the judge says he believes there is the possibility that someone COULD be incited to "a general attitude of disapproval", this is enough for the judge to send me to jail, even without any evidence.
I'm telling you this to warn you that by the time these hate speech laws have come into place, it's already too late. You will NEVER be able to beat these laws in court. You have to stop them before they are implemented. Let my fate be your warning.
Black Otter Rex rabbits.
Known for their velvety fur and distinctive black-and-tan markings, the breed’s plush coat comes from a rare genetic mutation first discovered in France in the early 1900s.
🇧🇪 Belgium just convicted Dries Van Langenhove for “hate speech” because he linked mass migration to crime and social decline during a university lecture using statistics and scientific sources.
The judge openly admitted the facts themselves were not false.
That’s the terrifying part.
The ruling basically says you can still be punished even when what you say is true, if the government decides your framing is politically unacceptable.
He’s already spent over €420,000 fighting these cases and says more prosecutions are coming.
Welcome to Europe
Source: @DVanLangenhove
Unsere Demokratie™ geht so:
Werden wir gewählt, ist das Demokratie. Werden wir nicht gewählt, ist es falsche Demokratie. Dann müssen wir Unsere Demokratie™ so ändern, dass wir trotzdem irgendwie die Sieger sind.
Was die wenigsten wissen.
In allen Stadträten, Gemeinderäten und Kreisräten gibt es sogenannte Fraktionsstärken. Diese berechtigen zur Teilnahme an Ausschusssitzungen, zur Einbringung von Anträgen und zu weiteren Mitwirkungsrechten - da solche Räte recht klein sind, reichen meist schon zwei Abgeordnete einer Partei zur Fraktionsstärke.
Es sei denn, die AfD hat zwei Abgeordnete. Dann beginnt die erste Sitzung mit einem Antrag der Änderung der Fraktionsstärke auf so viel Personen, wie sie die AfD nicht hat.
Das findet im ganzen Land hunderfach statt nach jeder Kommunalwahl.
Und wenn ein AfD-Politiker der Alterspräsident ist, der die Sitzung eröffnen darf wie bei Gauland dann ändert man schnell die Geschäftsordnung des Bundestags. Bei Jürgen Treutler in Thüringen, sprechen sich eben CDU, SPD, Linke und BSW ab, dass sie ihn nach jedem zweiten Wort anschreien wie die Verrückten, damit er nicht zu Wort kommt und die Tagesordnung nicht abarbeiten kann, so dass man gesetzeswidrig einen Antrag einbringen kann der einen AfD-Landtagspräsidenten verhindert.
Und wenn man Angst hat abgewählt zu werden, dann erhöht man halt die Dauer der Legislaturperiode, so dass man möglichst viel Diäten und Rentenansprüche einsacken kann, auch wenn die eigenen Umfragewerte auf 15 % abgesackt sind.
Unsere Demokratie™ ist nicht Demokratie. Unsere Demokratie™ ist Korruption auf allen Ebenen durch einen moralisch verkommenen Politadel, der glaubt, Deutschland und seine Steuergelder wären deren Privatbesitz, den sie nach Herzenslust verschwenden, verschenken und stehlen können.
Der Coup d'État mit dem die CDU gemeinsam mit Sozialisten und Kommunisten sich in den Thüringer Landtag geputscht hat, ist immer noch auf YouTube dokumentiert:
https://t.co/xjkxA29uP7
My word. This is incredible. A real-life version of that scene from The Life of Brian: "Stan, you haven't got a womb! Where's the foetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!"
Sometimes to troll left-wing journalists who ask me, "So, how do you define real German" I answer:
"A real German is a German who is supposed to feel guilty for his past."
The reactions are always priceless.
Ein Interview mit dem bayerischen Förster Josef Erhard entwickelt sich derzeit auf YouTube zum viralen Hit. Der langjährige Waldexperte schildert darin detailliert, welche Eingriffe der Bau von Windkraftanlagen im Wald tatsächlich bedeuten. Von Rodungen und Bodenverdichtung über Infrastrukturmaßnahmen bis hin zu Auswirkungen auf Tiere, Trinkwasser und Landschaftsbild erhebt Erhard schwere Vorwürfe gegen Politik und Medien. Das Gespräch stößt auf großes Interesse, weil es viele Aspekte anspricht, die in der öffentlichen Debatte über Windkraft kaum thematisiert werden.
Artikel hier lesen: https://t.co/i6ggDet2nt
Men 250 years ago: “I’ve been drinking Madeira wine, ale, rum, and hard cider since I weened off my mother’s tit. Water? Never touched the poison. On the morrow, I shall overthrow the most powerful empire in the history of the world.
Men today: “I drank a glass of wine and it ruined my life. I couldn’t even podcast. My bracelet told me I was dying.”