Prateek Urmaliya

crypto | web3❤️

[Prateek Urmaliya @Prateek_Ur_]

@officialmudrex #AppleonMudrex

[CoinDCX : India Ka Crypto Coach @CoinDCX]

#ContestAlert
Har lesson ke peeche koi na koi teacher hota hai. Aapki life ka woh teacher kaun hai, jisne kabhi teacher hone ka label nahi liya?

Share it with us, and 20 lucky winners will receive ₹1,000 worth of Bitcoin each!

How to participate 👇
• Like this post ❤️
• Reply/Quote post your answer with #TeachersHarJagahHain 💬
• Follow & tag @CoinDCX

T&C
• Rewards will be given only to registered CoinDCX users.
• Contest ends on 6th September 2026
* Winners will be announced on 11th September 2026
• 20 winners will receive ₹1,000 worth of Bitcoin each. 🎁
• Rewards will be processed within 14 business days.
• Duplicate IDs will lead to disqualification.
• Any change in Twitter/X username during the contest period will lead to disqualification.
• CoinDCX reserves the right to disqualify entries that violate contest rules or platform guidelines.

#TeachersHarJagahHain #CoinDCX

[Prateek Urmaliya @Prateek_Ur_]

@CoinDCX If life had a classroom, my mother would be my favourite teacher. She taught me lessons no textbook could ever cover — patience, courage, failure, and the strength to start again. Grateful for my first and forever teacher. Happy Teachers’ Day, Mom!
@CoinDCX
#TeachersHarJagahHain

[Bybit South Asia @BybitSouthasia]

20K! We did it! 🥳🔥

There might be a little surprise waiting for our community… 👀🎁

🔁 Repost this post and keep an eye out.

[Bybit South Asia @BybitSouthasia]

Spot the Real NVIDIA Logo & Win $50 USDT! 🥳
Can you tell which one is the real NVIDIA logo? 👀

✅ Follow @BybitSouthasia
❤️ Like & RT this post
💬 Comment your answer & tag 2 friends 👥

🎁 Prize $50 USDT
🏆 Winners will be randomly selected from correct entries.

📅 Deadline: Sep 7, 11:59PM UTC

#CryptoGiveaway #WinUSDT

[Prateek Urmaliya @Prateek_Ur_]

@BybitSouthasia Answer - B

@Raj__U_01
@Shashankm2912

[Prateek Urmaliya @Prateek_Ur_]

@CoinDCX Thanks @CoinDCX

[Prateek Urmaliya @Prateek_Ur_]

@officialmudrex $79,180

[Prateek Urmaliya @Prateek_Ur_]

@officialmudrex $2,483

[Prateek Urmaliya @Prateek_Ur_]

@officialmudrex $81.00

[Shashank Mishra | Builder Base 🇮🇳 @Shashankm2912]

BTC’s $64K → $70K Domino Effect 🧵❌

BTC didn’t just wake up and randomly pump nearly 9%.

The move looked more like a domino chain.

Macro improved risk sentiment → BTC started breaking higher → leveraged shorts got squeezed → forced buying pushed BTC even higher → ETH and SOL caught the momentum.

What interests me most is the leverage effect.

When BTC started moving, traders betting on further downside were suddenly trapped. Once those shorts were liquidated, their positions became forced buying.

That buying pushed BTC higher, which created even more pressure on remaining shorts.

That’s the feedback loop:

BTC ↑ → shorts liquidated → forced buying ↑ → BTC ↑ again.

Then ETH and SOL followed as traders became more confident that the move wasn't limited to BTC.

My takeaway: I wouldn't automatically call this the start of a new bull market. A leveraged squeeze can make a move look much stronger than the original catalyst.

For me, the real test comes next:

Can BTC hold the higher levels and attract genuine spot demand after the short-squeeze fuel disappears?

If yes, this domino effect could be the beginning of something bigger.

If not, the move may turn out to have been mostly leverage unwinding.

@officialmudrex

[Prateek Urmaliya @Prateek_Ur_]

@CoinDCX @tethergold I’d pick XAUT

Physical gold has timeless trust, but XAUT fits my digital-first lifestyle better. It’s easier to manage and move alongside my other digital assets.

Physical gold = gold I store
XAUT = gold I can move

#XAUTonCoinDCX
@tethergold
@CoinDCX

[Bybit South Asia @BybitSouthasia]

$50 USDT Word Chain Hunt Giveaway 🎉

Dive into our puzzle grid and find ANY 3 crypto words to win! 🔍💰

✅ Follow @BybitSouthasia
❤️ Like & RT this post 🔁
💬 Comment your 3 words & 👥 tag 2 friends

🎁 $50 USDT Giveaway
🏆 Random winners will be selected from the correct entries.

📅 Deadline: 31 Aug, 11:59 PM UTC

#Bybit #CryptoGiveaway

[Prateek Urmaliya @Prateek_Ur_]

@BybitSouthasia SOL
VOLUME
WIF
@Shashankm2912
@UmangGupta43173

[Shashank Mishra | Builder Base 🇮🇳 @Shashankm2912]

🚨 Imagine your best friend says:

"I'm investing ₹10 lakh into ONE crypto project. Which one should I buy?"

My answer wouldn't be the name of a coin.

It would be:

"Let's research first."

Crypto isn't like buying a lottery ticket. Every investment should answer one simple question:

👉 "Why will this project still matter 5 years from now?"

Here's the beginner-friendly checklist I use before investing.
👇

#Crypto #DYOR

[Shashank Mishra | Builder Base 🇮🇳 @Shashankm2912]

Hyperliquid vs everyone else 👀

July trading volume reportedly hit ~$218B more than the next 7 perp DEXs combined.

But I don't think traders keep choosing Hyperliquid simply because it's already the biggest.

I think it's the flywheel:

1. UX

The trading experience feels familiar.

For an active trader, small things matter: finding a market quickly, checking positions, placing orders and managing them without fighting the interface.

Good UX reduces friction.

2. Liquidity

This is probably the biggest advantage.

More traders create more liquidity.

More liquidity means better execution and less concern about slippage, especially when position sizes get larger.

And better execution attracts even more traders.

3. Speed

Perps aren't a “place an order and forget it” market.

Prices move fast. Liquidations happen fast. Opportunities disappear fast.

So execution speed and a responsive trading experience aren't nice-to-have features they're part of the product.

4. Network effect

This is where everything connects:

More traders
→ more liquidity
→ better execution
→ better experience
→ more traders

Once that loop gets strong enough, competing purely on features becomes difficult.

Community and hype can bring traders through the door.

But I think execution is what makes them stay.

That's why my answer to “Why Hyperliquid?” isn't one feature.

It's the combination of UX + liquidity + speed + network effects.

The real question now:

Can another perp DEX build a better flywheel, or has Hyperliquid already created too much of a liquidity advantage?

Curious what you think.

[Shashank Mishra | Builder Base 🇮🇳 @Shashankm2912]

Looks bullish. So I tried to kill the thesis.

Let’s take $ARB as an example.

Arbitrum has ~$1.2B TVL and ~$516M market cap. Sounds attractive.

But before buying, I’d check 3 things:

1️⃣ Valuation vs real value

TVL alone doesn't mean the token is undervalued.

I’d compare ARB’s market cap with the actual fees/revenue the network captures.

Arbitrum generates meaningful activity, but the gap between ecosystem activity and value actually accruing to the token matters.

2️⃣ Token supply

This is where my eyebrows go up.

ARB has a 10B max supply, with ~66.1% currently unlocked.

And another unlock is scheduled for Aug 16.

More supply isn't automatically bearish but if new supply keeps arriving faster than demand grows, holders can face dilution.

3️⃣ Is usage actually growing?

I’d track TVL, active addresses, transactions, DEX/perps volume and fees over time.

Because one good day of activity doesn't prove a lasting investment thesis.

🚩 My ONE instant red flag:

If I see valuation rising while fundamental usage + revenue are falling, I walk away.

I don't want to buy a story.

I want the numbers to eventually prove the story.

That's the 5-minute crypto background check I'd do before putting my money in.

Not financial advice. Just how I’d investigate before buying.

[Shashank Mishra | Builder Base 🇮🇳 @Shashankm2912]

Robinhood’s crypto numbers tell a weird story.

Crypto transaction revenue fell 43.2% in H1 2026.

And yet Robinhood is going deeper into crypto.

That sounds contradictory.

I think it actually reveals where retail investing is heading. 🧵

Robinhood is building around:

• Stocks & options
• Crypto
• Prediction markets
• AI-powered market tools
• Tokenized assets
• Robinhood Chain
• DeFi
• Agentic trading

So I don’t think Robinhood is trying to become “another crypto exchange.”

It’s trying to make crypto part of a much bigger financial experience.

And that distinction matters.

Think about how most people invest today.

Stocks are in one place.

Crypto somewhere else.

Prediction markets somewhere else.

DeFi is still mostly a separate world.

Robinhood’s bet seems to be:

“What if the user never has to care which category an asset belongs to?”

They just open one app and invest.

That’s a much bigger ambition than simply selling Bitcoin.

And the numbers show why this strategy makes sense.

In Q2, Robinhood’s transaction-based revenue jumped 44% YoY to $776M.

Crypto contributed $100M, down 38% YoY.

But equities, options and event contracts helped offset the weakness.

That tells me something important:

Crypto doesn’t have to be Robinhood’s biggest product for crypto to matter.

It can become the infrastructure connecting everything else.

Tokenized stocks are a good example.

If traditional assets can eventually move onchain, then the boundary between “traditional finance” and “crypto” starts becoming less important.

The user may not even think:

“I’m using blockchain.”

They’ll simply think:

“I’m buying an asset.”

And that could be crypto’s biggest mainstreaming moment.

Not millions of people suddenly becoming crypto experts.

But millions of people using onchain infrastructure without caring that it’s onchain.

That’s why I’m more interested in Robinhood’s strategy than its crypto revenue alone.

The real competition may not be:

Robinhood vs Coinbase.

It may be:

Who can build the easiest financial interface for the next generation of investors?

Crypto-native platforms have the technology, culture and liquidity.

Robinhood has something different:

A massive retail-investing distribution layer.

If Robinhood can combine that distribution with onchain rails, tokenization, prediction markets and AI…

the “crypto app” might not look like a crypto app anymore.

It might look like a normal investing app.

And honestly, I think that’s the more interesting future.

My prediction:

The next wave of crypto adoption won’t necessarily come from people choosing crypto over stocks.

It will come from people owning stocks, crypto, prediction contracts and tokenized assets in the same place without thinking about the underlying infrastructure.

Crypto may not become the entire financial system.

It may become the layer quietly running underneath it.

That’s the Robinhood bet I’m watching.

What do you think?

[Shashank Mishra | Builder Base 🇮🇳 @Shashankm2912]

Kill the 9-to-4? Maybe. Kill the off-switch? Absolutely not.

Markets going 24/7 sounds like freedom.

I actually think it could be a huge upgrade.

Imagine waking up in India and reacting to a US market move immediately instead of waiting for the opening bell. Global investors get access when they need it, not when a timezone says so.

And the shift is already happening: NYSE is building toward 24/7 tokenized markets, while the LSE plans a new overnight venue in 2027. Crypto-style stock perps are already trading around the clock.

But here's my concern:

24/7 access can easily become 24/7 temptation.

More screen time.
More impulsive trades.
More leverage.
More “let me just check the market once” at 2 AM.

So I don't think the goal should be:

“Markets never sleep.”

It should be:

“Markets are always accessible, so investors don't have to be.”

Give people the infrastructure to trade anytime.

But don't turn investing into a job that never clocks out.

That's the real financial freedom I'd want.

@officialmudrex

[Shashank Mishra | Builder Base 🇮🇳 @Shashankm2912]

Everyone is watching ETF flows to figure out what’s moving crypto.

But I think we’re looking at the wrong layer.

If I had to pick ONE force driving crypto right now:

Liquidity.

BTC is hovering around $63K.

At the same time, recent U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF flows have been under pressure, with roughly $390M in weekly outflows reported. Yet BTC is still holding around the $63K area instead of completely breaking down.

That tells me something.

ETF flows matter.

Institutions matter.

Retail matters.

Regulation matters.

But they are all connected to a bigger question:

How much liquidity and risk appetite is actually available?

Think of it like this:

Fed policy
↓
Liquidity & financial conditions
↓
Risk appetite
↓
Institutional allocation
↓
ETF flows
↓
Crypto prices

This is why I don't see ETF flows as the ultimate driver.

They are more like the dashboard showing us where capital is going.

Liquidity is closer to the engine.

Look at what's happening now.

Bitcoin has been reacting alongside broader risk assets, while investors wait for clearer signals on rates. Even today's move higher was linked partly to changing expectations around U.S. rate policy.

And that's the part I find interesting.

If crypto were completely driven by ETFs, weak ETF flows should tell the entire story.

But they don't.

The bigger story is whether investors are becoming more willing to take risk.

When liquidity improves:

→ Institutions have more room to allocate
→ ETF demand can increase
→ Retail confidence usually follows
→ Higher-beta crypto starts attracting attention
→ Prices can reinforce the cycle

When liquidity tightens, the reverse can happen.

Institutions become selective.

ETF inflows slow.

Retail becomes cautious.

And suddenly even strong crypto narratives struggle to get capital.

That's also why I'm paying attention to the Fed and financial conditions rather than obsessing over one day's ETF number.

And regulation?

The stalled CLARITY Act matters because regulatory clarity can influence how comfortable institutions and businesses are with crypto.

But again, regulation can change the ability and willingness to deploy capital.

Liquidity determines whether that capital actually wants to move.

So my ranking right now would be:

1. Liquidity / interest rates
2. Institutional positioning
3. ETF flows
4. Regulation
5. Retail

Not because the others don't matter.

They absolutely do.

But I think we're confusing the pipes with the water.

ETFs are a pipe.

Institutions are a pipe.

Retail is a pipe.

Liquidity is the water flowing through the system.

That's why my biggest question isn't:

“Are ETF inflows coming back?”

It's:

“Are financial conditions becoming supportive enough for capital to take risk again?”

If the answer turns bullish, ETF flows may follow.

If the answer stays bearish, even the best crypto narratives may struggle.

So my takeaway is simple:

Don't just follow the money.
Follow what makes the money move.

What do you think is actually driving crypto right now?

@officialmudrex