We're a nonprofit advocating for multiparty democracy through #ProportionalRepresentation in California. Join our movement for a better democracy! #FBPR
Were you happy with the available choices on Election Day? If so, we're happy for you.
But if not, work with us to tear down the two-party system and replace it with a more representative, competitive, and functional multi-party system via #ProportionalRepresentation.
Tyranny of the majority is bad, but tyranny of the minority is worse.
It's far better to force the largest minority to compromise than to let them wield unchecked power.
Just sayin'.
@chrisdiacon Anybody who thinks FPTP is better than PR should look at the US, which has given the largest minority party unchecked power and no incentive to compromise.
"#ProportionalRepresentation... is receiving important energy and attention. ...[A] poll... suggests Americans are open to changing winner-take-all elections to ones where like-minded voters can elect candidates in proportion to their voting strength."
https://t.co/pWhbYZO3BQ
"An act of Congress governing redistricting could take many forms. Congress might, for example, repeal the ban on multi-member districts established by the 1967 law, and implement #ProportionalRepresentation."
And they should!
https://t.co/gDDUP3JWTX
Were you happy with the available choices on Election Day? If so, we're happy for you.
But if not, work with us to tear down the two-party system and replace it with a more representative, competitive, and functional multi-party system via #ProportionalRepresentation.
@PaulStewartII@steeletalk Agreed you are on solid ground, but things can change quickly. The US appeared to be on solid ground ten years ago.
And #ProportionalRepresentation is also a proven system, used by most of the world's democracies, particularly the healthiest ones.
@PaulStewartII@steeletalk Canada is indeed on that above list, and some of us think it's because it's parliamentary instead of presidential.
But on the question of multi-party versus two-party, we think the evidence is clear. Anything that decentralizes power is a good check on corruption.
A party wins 40% of the vote. They deserve:
A) all of the power
B) none of the power
C) a 40% share of the power
If they get 60%, they deserve:
A) all of the power
B) none of the power
C) a 60% share of the power
Did you pick C? Then you support #ProportionalRepresentation.
I wrote a long law review essay about why proportional representation is essential for successful multiracial multiethnic democracy. The tldr: winner-take-all political systems are really bad for diverse societies. Two-party systems are bad for minorities.
https://t.co/7c8I4QeDIk
@PaulStewartII@steeletalk With politics, trouble is inevitable. Institutions that share power fairly are more likely to handle conflicts over power and resources in a way that satisfies more people.
Look to the US to see how easily the largest minority can gain unchecked power under winner-take-all.
Electing Congress and state legislatures by proportional representation would secure fair, inclusive multiparty representation for a politically diverse population.
https://t.co/1MnwTtscyk
@AZGreenParty@GreenPartyUS@gpelections@gpusccc
"#ProportionalRepresentation is basically race neutral… It allows, basically, the voters to determine the groupings rather than some state entity or some politicians creating the political winners and losers."
https://t.co/XsL5fXsQmY
"For the first time, California law explicitly recognizes [#ProportionalRepresentation] voting methods... as remedies... available to all local jurisdictions, including cities without a charter, sometimes known as 'general law cities.'"
https://t.co/O71oXcZz7i
For @SpencerOverton, one of the virtues of proportional representation is that it changes who gets to define a political community, solving concerns about politicians dictating race-based or partisan political lines.
@urbanlamb@acoyne At the end of the day, #ProportionalRepresentation performs quite well.
If you want things done fast, go with a one-party system (e.g., China, or even the US right now). If you want things done according to how the people actually want them done, go with a multi-party system.