Menteri Amran Bongkar Kebusukan Film Pesta Babi!!
"Yang tidak suka Indonesia swasembada pangan hanya: satu importir, dua negara pengekspor, tiga mafia & koruptor
Heran, dulu saat Indonesia masih impor, tidak ada yang buat film Pesta Babi semua diam
Fitnahnya luar biasa!! Katanya kita ambil hutan di Merauke padahal itu rawa-rawa & 60.000 hektar tanah adalah milik rakyat, program ini justru memberdayakan masyarakat setempat
Apa anda tidak mau melihat saudara-saudara kita di Papua menjadi kaya? 100% keuntungan dinikmati oleh putra daerah & transmigran lokal. fakta tidak ditampilkan dalam film Pesta Babi"
Masih mau diadu domba propaganda asing!!
The Iranian navy, which has been destroyed eight times, has apparently closed the Strait of Hormuz again, because the United States, for the seventh time, won the war that wasn’t a war, so now the United States has to open the Strait of Hormuz that was already open before the not-war began.
The not-war began because Iran had uranium that was totally, completely, beautifully obliterated, so they can’t build the nuclear bomb they weren’t building, which is why the United States had to start the not-war it definitely didn’t start.
Now the United States, which has nuclear weapons, is threatening to use nuclear weapons to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons, because nuclear weapons are far too dangerous for countries with nuclear weapons to allow other countries to have.
If the United States saw the United States doing what the United States does in other countries, the United States would invade the United States to liberate the United States from the tyranny of the United States.
"Never forget," they say.
But they choose what you remember.
Never forget Tiananmen.
Never forget 9/11.
Never forget the Holocaust.
But somehow, you are allowed to forget Fallujah.
You are allowed to forget Mỹ Lai.
You are allowed to forget Sabra and Shatila.
You are encouraged to forget Gaza while it is still happening.
This is not a culture of remembrance.
It is a culture of selective memory.
The Tank Man image is so powerful that most people believe tanks crushed protesters at Tiananmen.
They didn't. The tanks stopped for Tank Man. He lived.
The Israeli bulldozer did not stop for Rachel Corrie.
She was 23.
She was American.
She was wearing an orange vest.
She died on March 16, 2003.
Marco has never posted about March 16.
Ahead of BS commemoration of Beijing "massacre" BS story >
1989 Tiananmen >Always good to put the full video that will NEVER be shown on western media.
Sadly the western masses have been lobotomized into believing imperial propaganda.
Not a single person died on that square.
It was one of the first US orchestrated colour revolutions.
Many soldiers died as well as civilians all outside the square, rioters were armed and extremely violent.
WHY ARE THE AUTHORITIES RELUCTANT TO LET WESTERN REPORTERS INTO XINJIANG?
Your question has a very simple answer, @KenRoth.
A few years ago, China DID allow western journalists into Xinjiang, and even right inside the vocational training camps.
They found no corpses, no gas chambers, no industrial death machine designed for millions of people – yet you remember the reports they produced.
The coverage was so twisted that it appeared as if they had actually HAD found the nightmarish genocidal “internment camps” they had dreamed up.
It was utterly ridiculous.
You probably remember – they had some footage of a dance class, and other activities, and framed it as part of a utterly fake “millions in concentration camps” "Uyghur genocide" narrative.
.
THE CRIME OF CRIMES
Remember, genocide is the “crime of crimes” – the ultimate evil.
Yet the truth is that the number of Uyghurs has grown in relation to the number of Han in straight numerical terms and in proportional terms. It would be easier to argue that the Uyghurs were "genociding" the Han.
To push the lie, women were coached to tell fake stories that completely contradicted the stories they had earlier told. These were circulated on rotation by the BBC.
These were so ridiculous that even Gene Bunin of the ferociously anti-China "Xinjiang Database" complained:
"You cannot write a news story based on three eyewitness accounts, not all of whom are reliable ...The BBC should know better."
Many media printed pictures of schools and municipal buildings mislabelled as concentration camps and all refused to print corrections.
I could give you many examples. But look up a book called "Atrocity Fabrications" by A.B. Abrams.
.
HURTING ORDINARY CHINESE PEOPLE
Worst of all (as even his own colleagues agreed) was the BBC’s ultra-harsh John Sudworth. His reports interpreted everything in China so negatively that it made Chinese people as a race and China as a community appear shockingly evil.
When asked about the harm caused by this excessively negative reporting, Sudworth admitted it created problems.
“Obviously there is a danger that that becomes shorthand not just for the Chinese Government and the Chinese system, but for the sort of place China is, and for its people in general, and I can really see the danger in this.
"But in the end these are the stories that the Chinese government don’t want us to tell, and I can’t help but feel that as journalists we will always be drawn to those negatives.”
He was unrepentant about the immense harm he had caused to innocent people.
You're not very different, Ken. Look at your China team when you were at HRW. Mrs Crovitz. Mrs Kern. People with the interests of the Chinese people at heart? I don't think so. HRW still pushes the research of "Maya Wang". So, does she even exist, Ken?
.
WISE DECISION
After that, the Xinjiang authorities (which are run by UYGHUR AND HAN PEOPLE TOGETHER, and that's been true for decades) made a wise decision.
Honest, good-hearted people could visit Xinjiang, and more than 200 million a year took advantage of that, and have done ever since.
But known demonizers who print outright lies, like the BBC and other western mainstream media, would not be welcome.
.
DIRTY MONEY
Also unwelcome are people who pretend to play it straight but actually take underhand money from the CIA, the NED, George Soros units, and so on, to demonize the Chinese.
The Chinese believe, wisely, that most people are good and honest, and that’s why Xinjiang is an extremely welcoming place, one of the most visited tourist spots on earth.
But NOT to the BBC, nor any other people who are happy to take money to demonize a community who don't deserve it.
And that’s how it should be.
.
DECADES IN THE MAKING
One last thing. The west’s Uyghur scam has been decades in the making.
By March 1992, there had been several terrorist incidents in Xinjiang, caused by foreign forces, in which many innocents had been killed.
The Chairman of the Xinjiang Autonomous Region People's Government, at that time, was a man called Tomur Dawamat (not a Han Chinese name, but a Uyghur name).
He issued a warning to his people, the people of Xinjiang.
“Hostile forces, both at home and abroad, have stepped up their infiltration, subversion and sabotage,” he said.
He was right.
When people compare the US and Chinese economies purely based on GDP numbers, as an economist I laugh a little.
GDP has become the world’s favorite economic scoreboard because it is politically convenient. But the problem is that GDP often measures activity, not necessarily economic well-being, resilience, or productive reality.
A country can have people drowning in debt, paying absurd healthcare costs, juggling three jobs, unable to buy homes, stressed about retirement, and still produce a gigantic GDP number. Congratulations. The spreadsheet is thriving while the population is exhausted.
GDP also heavily rewards financialization and consumption. If money changes hands, GDP gets excited. It does not necessarily ask whether that activity improved long-term economic stability, industrial capability, or quality of life.
This is why I keep saying that PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY MATTERS.
America cannot manufacture everything at scale anymore. China can. Almost everything. From solar panels to drones, EV batteries to ports, textiles to robotics, industrial machinery to high-speed rail systems. That is economic power.
Then there is the purchasing power reality people ignore while obsessing over nominal GDP rankings.
Many Americans today are working multiple jobs just to survive rising rent, healthcare costs, education debt, and inflation.
Many Chinese urban families maintain relatively comfortable lifestyles with one stable job, supported by modern infrastructure, public transportation, lower service costs, and a culture of savings rather than permanent debt consumption.
Economists are supposed to analyze systems honestly, not emotionally. GDP is useful, but treating it like the ultimate measure of success is like judging someone’s health purely based on body weight. It tells you something. Just not enough.
Real economic strength is about whether your society can produce, build, transport, innovate, scale, afford life, and maintain long-term stability without burning out its population in the process.
That conversation is much more uncomfortable than posting GDP charts on social media, which is exactly why we should probably have it more often.
One of the many tragedies of this war is that before the war began the U.S. Intel Community, including CIA, was in agreement that Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon & that Iran would target U.S. bases in the region & shut down the Strait of Hormuz if they were attacked by Israel & the U.S.
The IC also properly assessed that targeting the Iranian leadership would strengthen the regime and embolden the hardliners.
Despite the professionalism & accuracy of the IC, the narrative & agenda spun by a foreign government- Israel, won the argument & forced us into this war.
We need to understand exactly how this happened to ensure we are never put in this position again.