This is it – the moment we’ve been waiting for. The SEC will drop its appeal – a resounding victory for Ripple, for crypto, every way you look at it.
The future is bright. Let's build.
Not only was SBF NOT debanked, he was provided unprecedented access to Congress and U.S. regulators, despite being the CEO of an offshore exchange.
He met with @GaryGensler AT LEAST twice. He met with the Chairman of the @CFTC. He had a personal meeting with the Chairwoman of the @FSCDems@RepMaxineWaters, who blew SBF a kiss because she was so smitten with him (or his 💰I should say).
SBF TESTI-LIED before Congress. He had access to the Senate Banking Committee as well as the White House.
That kind of access cost him $72M in political donations to Democrats plus $10M to the current Administration. At SBF’s trial, testimony was provided that showed when SBF was asked by Caroline Ellison what’s the $10M for, SBF replied “to gain access.” And boy did he get it.
SBF’s dad is Joe Bankman, who wrote @ewarren’s tax policy when she ran for president. SBF’s mom is Barbara Fried. She runs Mind the Gap - a super pac dedicated to electing progressives.
Why was SBF’s campaign finance fraud case dismissed?
Why haven’t SBF’s parents faced criminal charges? They received $10M in stolen FTX customer funds and had tens of millions of dollars in Bahamian luxury real estate in their names, paid with stolen customer funds?
Don’t forget, during the same time Gensler was meeting with SBF, @brian_armstrong@iampaulgrewal and @coinbase were told Gensler would not meet with them and that the SEC would not be taking Crypto meetings. 🤔
Why would Gensler agree to meet with the CEO of an offshore exchange but not meet with the CEO of America’s largest exchange?
There was a rumor going around that Gensler was close to cutting a deal with SBF that would grant FTX a regulatory advantage.
Gensler is 💯 a bad person. He lied before Congress multiple times. He lied about not knowing how to set up his work email at home and that’s why he used a private email while at the CFTC. This crook was the youngest partner in Goldman Sachs history, taught Blockchain at MIT, but couldn’t “figure out” his work email? Give me a frickin break!
He lied for @ewarren and testified-lied exactly how she told him to and said the “only” use case for Bitcoin and crypto assets is for criminals.
At MIT he said XRP and ETH needed regulatory clarity from the SEC and then testi-lied before Congress and said the rules were crystal clear.
He was Hilary Clinton’s CFO and would’ve been the person responsible for approving the payment for the Steele Dossier related to Russia and @realDonaldTrump. Yet, he testified-lied and said he had no idea that it was paid for by the campaign. Think about that: A SEVEN FIGURE PAYMENT is made by the Hilary Clinton Campaign but the Chief Financial Officer knows nothing about it.
Gary Gensler is a criminal. Period.
One way to end all the speculation and rumors related to SBF is to release all correspondence and meeting notes related to him.
@realDonaldTrump@elonmusk@VivekGRamaswamy please assign me to lead the investigation into this and/or Chokepoint 2.0. I’ll do it for free and save the taxpayers money.
Ep. 76 As they lecture us endlessly about human rights in other countries, the Biden administration is trying to kill journalist Julian Assange for the crime of embarrassing the CIA. His wife Stella joins us from his extradition hearing.
My analysis of the Putin interview.
I am only street smart.
Ive never professed to be anything else.
But these street smarts have taken me to the highest echelons of finance and fame without selling my soul, leaving me pitted in a mortal battle against The matrix for my very life and freedom.
I analyse the speech with no "expertise" besides my understanding of how simple the world can be when you rule out the impossibilities and are left with the few options which could be possible.
Unmatched perspicacity.
Many people are going to praise the interview regardless of what was said because Putin is respected and idolised for his nationalism and track record of competency.
These are the exact two qualities the common man is calling out for and never seems to find in western "leadership".
Many are going to consider the interview a fumbled chance to deal a deathblow to the USA in the midst of a culture war.
Tucker gave him many chances to nail the West hard for failing its people.
Why not mention election fraud?
Why give a lesson on Russian history the average Westerner has little interest in?
Why not mention the LGBT agenda destroying the family?
Why so softly state the US Dollar is failing when he could have highlighted it far more poignantly?
My thoughts patterns are simple.
Putins track record displays brutal competency.
"You will know them by their fruits" - Matthew 7:15-20
A man who produces results IS competent.
The idea that he "missed a chance" or "made a mistake" is brutal arrogance from a lay person.
We do not possess a fraction of the understanding of geopolitical power structures and interconnectedness that Putin does.
His track record displays absolute effectiveness, so I doubt he forgot to mention many of the things he has often mentioned to Russian state media.
He DOES say these things when speaking to Russians but he did NOT say them when speaking to the west.
He DECIDED not too.
The question is why?
WHY would Putin not want to accelerate the decimation of faith in western institutions by its constituents?
We should all accept the following statement to be true:
He knows things we do not know.
Coupled with the track record, we can state as a matter of fact that:
Putin is competent and knows things we do not know.
Overall, I would describe his attitude as altruistic.
He didnt care very much.
He sees the global mess as Americas problem to fix.
Not his.
He could have said things which would have accelerated the ending of the war in Ukraine by galvanising public support against it.
He did not say those things.
Why?
Does he want this war?
I dont know.
Are intelligence agencies already in touch?
Has a deal been done?
Is he avoiding rocking the boat because he has favourable agreements from "the other side"?
I dont know.
I repeat.
Putin is competent and knows things we do not know.
He did highlight evidently that America will fall anyway, with or without the Ukraine war.
He seems confident America will fall with or without the insanity purported by the western elite simply because of a refusal to understand a changing global landscape and population dynamics, along with weaponisation of the dollar.
i think many expected a death blow to the USA establishment and a highlight of the culture war and considering his competence, knowledge and experience, the most likely scenario that this didn't happen is simple...
Galvanising the American public to get their act together isnt good for Russia.
America and the collective west are already acting exactly how he would want them to act.
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte