Voddie Baucham: Critical Sex Theory - How to Keep Marx and Freud Out of Your Bedroom
How the culture seeks to subvert God's design for our relationships, doing immeasurable harm to all involved, and what you can do to protect yourself, your loved ones, and your walk with Christ.
Check this out,
Board member / leadership connections (where found)
I checked public records, news, biographies, and organizational sites for each. Hereās what turned up:
⢠Robert Lorton (likely Robert E. āBobā or Bobby Lorton, Tulsa media family):āØYes ā Prominent Oklahoma civic and business leader. Retired Chairman of the Board and CEO/Publisher of World Publishing Company and the Tulsa World newspaper.āØHe has served (or continues to serve in related capacities) on many boards and leadership roles, including:
⢠University of Tulsa (trustee, co-chaired capital campaigns)
⢠Philbrook Museum of Art
⢠Tulsa Area Chamber of Commerce
⢠Tulsa Area United Way (past chairman of fund drive)
⢠Oklahoma Chapter of the Nature Conservancy (past chairman)
⢠Tulsa Port of Catoosa Authority (past chairman)
⢠Other past roles: F&M Bank and Trust Co. director, Indian Nations Boy Scout Council, Salvation Army, etc. https://t.co/EN2vFxkBgg
⢠Jay Doudna:āØYes, in advocacy/service organizations ā Long involved in blindness and visual impairment services in Oklahoma. He has served on boards and in leadership roles such as:
⢠International Association of Audio Information Services (IAAIS) board
⢠Treasurer/officer roles in Oklahoma groups like the Oklahoma Council of the Blind or related organizations (e.g., OSLS)
⢠Active with Oklahoma Department of Rehabilitation Services (DRS) and related nonprofits. https://t.co/avpA0EY1Wz
⢠Frank Sonleitner (Dr. Frank J. Sonleitner):āØYes, in science/education organizations ā Professor of Zoology Emeritus at the University of Oklahoma. He has served on boards including:
⢠National Center for Science Education (NCSE) board member
⢠Oklahoma Academy of Science
⢠OESE (science education outreach, e.g., at Southeastern Oklahoma State University) ā past president/community outreach roles. https://t.co/dQN6Nxkbjb
⢠Robin Offill (or Robyn Offill):āØNo prominent board roles found in public searches. Limited public info; appears connected to Oklahoma Department of Human Services or private life in the OKC area. Small individual donor.
⢠John Barrett:āØNo clear high-profile board roles matching a major donor profile in searches.āØPossible matches include a John Barrett who is Superintendent of Fort Supply Public Schools (Oklahoma) or other local figures. (Note: There is a well-known John āRockyā Barrett, longtime Chairman of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation ā another Oklahoma tribe ā but no direct public link confirms this donor is him.)
Remember the Mississippi couple Billy and Virginia Blair who were murdered in their home by 17 year old Cordarius Hobbs last week?
Turns out his two older brothers Cortavious and Cortavion Hobbs were just caught after shooting a Covington County deputy during a traffic stop.
That deputy will never walk again.
Three brothers. One family. Two separate violent crimes in five days. This is the story the national media doesn't want to talk about?
Just wait until the Woke Right Christian Nationalists make a "conservative case" for transhumanism.
Many of you will be shocked and surprised.
You shouldn't be surprised: it is where all of this mess is heading.
The problem->reaction->solution cycle is going to eat therapy alive if we donāt start figuring out how political warfare works.
The value of therapy to the 4IR/social credit is HUGE, as well as the costs of failing to uphold the right to conscience.
We have a real obligation.
@HideYourKids0
š§µ
1/
Marco Rubio is a clear advocate for targeted public-private partnerships (PPPs) as a key tool within his āCommon Good Capitalismā framework.
Philanthropists and foundations like Arnold Ventures routinely provide grants for university research, including at public institutions such as the University of Oklahoma (OU) or similar schools in Utah and elsewhere, strengthening public-private partnerships (PPPs).
Through its Evidence & Evaluation team, Arnold Ventures funds rigorous, causal researchāprimarily randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studiesāin areas like higher education, criminal justice, health, infrastructure, and public finance.
They award millions annually in research grants, often to universities (e.g., University of Texas at Austin, University of Utah, University of Chicago, and University of California schools) for projects on education outcomes, career pathways, and policy impacts.
Critics of Arnold Ventures (AV) grants to universities for researchāprimarily in states like Texas (e.g., UT Austin), California (e.g., UC Irvine, UCLA), Michigan, Colorado, Indiana, and others. https://t.co/fNYYU83nqE
Key criticisms include:
⢠Lack of transparency and circumvention of traditional institutions: William Schambra and others argue AVās LLC structure allows the Arnolds to bypass public disclosure rules of 501(c)(3)/(c)(4) entities, enabling direct pursuit of policy goals with less accountability. Grantees (including university-linked projects) sometimes fail to prominently disclose AV funding in outputs like articles, lawsuits, or advocacy letters, creating perceptions of hidden influence. https://t.co/fNYYU83nqE
⢠Pushing ideological or reform agendas through āevidence-basedā research: In higher education, critics claim AV-funded studies and evaluations advance priorities like greater institutional accountability, performance metrics, restrictions on for-profit/online program managers (OPMs), student debt protections, and pension/public finance reforms. This is seen as tilting toward progressive or technocratic solutions that undermine traditional university autonomy, faculty governance, or public institutions (e.g., favoring certain criminal justice or economic mobility evaluations that align with AVās views). https://t.co/UausPAJTY3
⢠Coordinated influence campaigns: In states with AV-supported university research (e.g., on college outcomes or policy evaluations), some allege it fuels litigation, regulatory pushes, and media narratives without balanced counterviews, potentially pressuring institutions or shaping state policy debates. https://t.co/UausPAJTY3
A example of a Oklahoma P3 partnering with TK Health (formerly Turn Key Health Clinics) ā a for-profit private contractor providing medical/mental health services in county jails ā
Flow Summary (AV Research Guides Practice)
AV RCT Evidence (proves value)
ā
Strengthens/Incentivizes NCCHC Accreditation (gold standard)
ā
Contracts Mandate TK Health Compliance (operational requirement for bids, payments, liability protection).
ā
Improved (or targeted) Jail Healthcare Outcomes
Key Takeaway: AV doesnāt directly fund or partner with TK Health. It funds independent research validating the NCCHC standards that TK Health (and other contractors) must follow under government contracts. This creates an evidence-based feedback loop: research ā standards ā contractor performance.
This model is common in regulated sectors where philanthropy backs rigorous evaluation of existing best practices.
RESULTS are jails primarily allege systemic deficiencies in care quality, driven by cost-cutting measures that endanger detainees. = COUNTLESS LAWSUITS
"Queer Theory is one of the most destructive ideas ever to have been loosed onto our society from the halls of academia." -@ConceptualJames
https://t.co/gTMbnbdpkS
Oklahoma P3ās have already been nightmares!
Oklahoma has had Millions across several agencies that are unaccounted for. Itās so bad that it seems as though
the billionaire philanthropists donāt care how many innocent people die, how much waste and corruption occurs.
Just whatever it takes to usurp the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Supreme Court!
The only reason our bills are stricter than Utah and most blue states ( some policy were no better ) is b/c we havenāt passed RCV and or Open Primaries. AV is not going to give up on getting RCV passed in Oklahoma. Two or three of our popular Governor candidates and an Oklahoma News X account are pushing for Citizens Advisory Committees/Boards. It sounds good but what conservatives donāt understand is Democrats will be included. The UN loves the boards and the citizens participation in other states has pushed RCV. Theyāll spin a narrative that RCV is a bi partisan policy and influence our state legislature to pass it!
Then what conservatism Oklahomans have left will go bye bye!!
2. Arnold Ventures uses his rigorous research for best practices across all areas of philanthropy. Heās spent more influencing cashless bail than Soros.
Heās a Soros surrogate who overlaps with Kochs on their CJ reforms.
The results of CJ reforms across the U.S. are horrific. Itās purposeful created chaos as you know to destabilize.
It seems everything AV is involved with turns out to be a nightmare like with
TK Health. He funds research to get results he wants to then give to NGOs lobbyists who spin policy by telling legislators they have bi-partisan policies voters want. Surveys are included. The survey companies often survey 500.
Who verifies all this??? Itās a racket, and a scam to restructure state governments.
Oklahoma just passed SB1530. Itās to incentivize Oklahoma Universities to research and strengthen P3ās.
Utah has similar program. It encourages in-state R&D with a credit aligned to federal rules and some general oversight/reporting, but it lacks the specific annual transparency mandates and the extra tightened exclusions introduced by Oklahomaās SB 1530. For the most current details, check the Utah State Tax Commission site or official code on https://t.co/ETTf1aaMcF.
I wonder I wonder I wonderā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦.
IF Drummond and Mazzei make top 2ā Will Jakeās X supporters and Oklahoma X news media styled accounts plugging Jake then give their support for Drummond???????
My belief from the moment Jake announcedā IS Jake is being supported by some group to help Drummond!!
Jake may not be worried about his mortgage because some ELITE group might make sure his bills are taken care of after the primary is over if he doesnāt make top 2.
And if he doesnāt make top twoāWill all the X Oklahoma political accounts who plugged Jake then attempt to sway Jakeās supporters to vote for Drummond instead of Mazzei š¤??? Weāll see!!!!!!
šµ Grassroots vs. Millionaires: Jake Merrickās Campaign Is Running on a Shoestring
Jake Merrickās just-filed 2026 Pre-Primary Campaign Finance Report shows a candidate running a true grassroots, low-budget campaign for governor, in sharp contrast to the millionaire candidates and self-funded operations dominating this race.
Merrick began the April 1 through June 1 reporting period with just $4,275 in the bank.
Over those two months, he raised $33,178 in monetary contributions, received another $6,780 in in-kind contributions, and spent $34,988.
He ended the reporting period with just $2,466 cash on hand.
This is not a campaign with millions in the bank or the ability to write large personal checks to itself.
It is a lean operation built on small-dollar donations, in-kind support, and candidate reimbursements.
Most of Merrickās contributions came from individual Oklahomans giving modest amounts. There were dozens of donations ranging from $50 to $500.
A few larger contributions stood out, including:
⢠$3,411 from Pamela McClure
⢠$3,100 from Eric Swart
⢠$3,100 from Jami Swart
The Swart contributions were made on the same day from the same Alva address.
Even so, the report overwhelmingly reflects a small-donor campaign.
One of the most significant forms of support came through in-kind contributions.
Firefighter Rick Horner donated the use of an RV for campaign travel, valued at $2,600 per month during April and May, totaling $5,200 during this reporting period alone.
Other in-kind contributions covered items such as:
⢠Printing
⢠Mailing supplies
⢠Office supplies
⢠Parade materials
This type of practical support helps reduce the campaignās actual cash expenditures while allowing Merrick to continue traveling and campaigning statewide.
So where did the money go?
A substantial portion went back to Merrick himself through candidate reimbursements.
During this reporting period, he was reimbursed more than $14,000 for fuel, travel expenses, filing fees, and other campaign-related costs he personally covered.
Additional expenditures included:
⢠Yard signs and printing through Sign It Up
⢠Travel and lodging expenses
⢠Hampton Inns
⢠Loveās Travel Stops
⢠Oklahoma Turnpike tolls
⢠Website and digital services through GoDaddy
⢠Recurring QR code services
⢠Radio advertising
⢠Event tables and sponsorships
⢠Bookkeeping services
⢠Photography
What the report does not show is just as noteworthy.
There are no massive media buys.
There are no high-dollar out-of-state political consultants.
There are no large PAC contributions.
This is retail politics: signs, events, travel across Oklahoma, and a basic digital presence.
The contrast with the millionaire candidates in this race is striking.
While some campaigns have access to millions through candidate loans and are spending heavily on consultants, advertising, and media placement, Merrick is operating on a shoestring budget.
He finished the reporting period with less than $2,500 in cash, enough to keep the campaign moving for now, but with virtually no financial cushion.
The report paints the picture of a candidate attempting to run a statewide campaign the old-fashioned way:
Relying on supporters for small-dollar donations and in-kind help.
Reimbursing himself for travel expenses as funds become available.
Stretching every dollar on fuel, signs, events, and voter outreach instead of expensive media buys.
Whether that approach can compete against self-funded millionaire candidates remains to be seen.
What is clear from the numbers is that Jake Merrick is running a genuinely low-budget, grassroots operation in a race where several of his opponents have substantially deeper pockets and far greater self-funding capacity.
All figures come directly from Merrickās Oklahoma Ethics Commission Pre-Primary Report filed June 8, 2026.
Iām concerned that there are some in his base that MAY attempt to encourage Merrick voters to vote for Drummond by coming out and declaring theyāre voting for Drummond. It may only be a few but since Jake is considered a religious grassroots candidate, it wouldnāt make sense for any of his voters to choose Drummond under any circumstance. If Jake is in top 2, Iām voting for Jake.
Iām not attacking. This is a race to become Governor of a state. Iāve discussed his history. Weāve all experienced the madness of the last 18 -19 yrs. regarding politics.
Listen to these politicians. Read their platforms/plans. Then ask AI if this is already being done and if so, what do conservative critics say about XYZ.
We canāt just take peopleās word! We have to do our homework. Politicians can use AI now! They have fewer excuses!
You can take a bill off https://t.co/2GHzTU1YVX and paste it into AI and ask what the bill does and doesnāt do in simple terms. Then ask AI if similar bills have passed in other states. Then ask what do conservative critics say about the results of laws passed. Itās wild how much you learn. I love learning. Iām done believing any politician can be some ultimate savior type, I back who I think will do least evil and Iāll call them out when needed.
@LouLouLiberty I didnāt make up Jake running for office for past 6 years:
Jake not being reelected for House Rep.
Jake having serious financial struggles
Jake promoting CABs that the UN supports.
Not a surprising response.
Iāve spent the past 4.5 years being involved in many Republican circles. Served with conservative organizations.
Iāve had many conversations and learned far more than I ever dreamed Iād learn.
The number one group of people the WEF-UN is after is the religious Republican voters. In order to attempt to sway us, the Elites are going to naturally want religious candidates. Just b/c someone says theyāre Republican doesnāt mean theyāre Republican. Just because someone says theyāre a Christian doesnāt mean theyāre a Christian. I DONT TRUST any political candidate. I listen closely to what the candidate promotes and I investigate, research. I also look at what theyāve accomplished politically and personally.
I got on X 5 years ago. I was off a bit and got back on. I got on X to learn. Iāve posted several threads people arenāt happy about. Some of my past threads are found under Highlights!!
Itās politics. Iām actually happy when thereās disagreement b/c at least weāre not robotic like the Democrats.