🚨 #ICYMI: Read our latest #ResearchIntegrity blog with Andrew Porte (@CRUK_MI) delving into the role of #Postdocs in supporting good research integrity in the labs 👉 https://t.co/w3xXdfoqAh
@Retropz
Andrew Porter (@CRUK_MI) shares why postdocs are at the forefront of promoting a healthy research culture, in our latest #ResearchIntegrity column.
They:
✔️embrace new ideas
✔️train and induct new starters
✔️promote open conversation
👉 https://t.co/w3xXdfoqAh
@Retropz
🌟 #Postdocs play a big role in supporting research integrity. In the recent #ResearchIntegrity blog, @CRUK_MI's Andrew Porter (@Retropz) explains their role in supporting integrity from embracing open research practices to bringing new ideas to the lab 👉 https://t.co/w3xXdfoqAh
Postdocs provide much of the fabric that underpins research integrity 👩🔬
This #Postdoc Appreciation Week, Andrew Porter (@CRUK_MI) talks about why postdocs are unsung heroes when it comes to #ResearchIntegrity & building a healthy research culture 👉 https://t.co/w3xXdfoqAh
This Postdoc Appreciation Week [@UK_NPAW] our Research Integrity and Training Adviser Dr Andrew Porter (@Retropz) highlights the many important roles #postdocs play in supporting #ResearchIntegrity - and links to resources to further support postdoc CPD
#lovepostdocs#NPAW2024
It's that time of year again! On way by 🚄 to #ESMO24 - excited to hear about all the new research! Please chk out the climate session Sat 10am Tarragona hall 7 #ESMO4Climate@myESMO@OncoAlert
Reading another piece on the issues with #Twitter, I decided to try out @bluesky
Immediate impressions are that it is more like early Twitter - less frenetic, uncluttered, simple to use - and I've already found a bunch of people to follow
Find me at: https://t.co/zlCrRa3X7l
@nickwizzo@MDPIOpenAccess@ElsevierConnect In each case, I think all the authors received a notification of the changes to authorship, and all had to sign off on them - so there was some sort of process. Understanding more of the issues with authorship now I would certainly advocate for even stricter processes
@nickwizzo@MDPIOpenAccess@ElsevierConnect Definitely agree that there should be very stringent oversight in terms of adding authors.
But in terms of doing it, I've added authors (and been added a couple of times) during revisions to manuscripts which needed new experiments or additional methods/approaches
Get ready for 2 more days of incredible discoveries with four new Summer Science Exhibits at Jodrell Bank!
Meet inspiring researchers from @royalsociety and @OfficialUoM who will teach you about photons, dark matter, DNA and more🧑🔬
⏰10 - 5
📆10th + 11th Aug
🎟️Free with entry
@westwoodsam1@deevybee Seconding the great recommendations so far. Also the REAPPRAISED checklist has lots of things to look out for - https://t.co/X970bVtmxY
I also recommend the @PubPeer plugin for browsers, and using a reference manager that checks the @RetractionWatch database
🎉 The Visualisation, Irradiation and Analysis Core Facility, headed by @stevebagley, have just achieved Silver Level in the Laboratory Efficiency Assessment Framework (LEAF) this week!
@deevybee They say "the customer is always right", and here the 'customer' is the author. All the many opportunities to revise, adapt, resubmit etc make sense if viewed from a business perspective rather than a scientific one. Even the rapid speed of process is customer-focused
Each year we offer a range of funded PhD projects, including clinical, non-clinical and MB-PhD opportunities. 👩🔬🧬
Complete our short form to learn more about our PhD opportunities and be the first to know when projects are open to application: https://t.co/IuJwucqYzO
#Spamference alert:
I just got an invitation to talk at the “Unveiling Microbial Mysteries: Pioneering Solutions for Tomorrow's Challenges' conference by Cognition Conferences. There are several tell-tale signs this is a predatory conference organizer.
https://t.co/nJdEoLL1wM