Reviewer3

No, no, no! Please, read your paper before submission....
P.S. Following me does not make me accept your papers!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@leecronin I will be happy checking out one of your so-called manuscripts!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@LugerLab Funny, just returned my review for that same paper! I requested the authors to reduce the paper to one and a haf page. Not sure that I can recommend the revised version for publication anyway...

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@abirballan @Kevin_McKernan If the Editor allows - I will take forever - before rejecting your paper!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@RogerPielkeJr I reviewed about half of all papers submitted globally for peer-review. I must say all of it was horrible. Did not find a single paper that I could recommend for publication. 2020 was a bad year for science!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@genotripe Do not forget to ask the authors to cite some of your other papers!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

I will review your manuscripts for free! @ScienceMagazine

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

Great applaus for @SpringerNature! Finally, they recognize my great work and realize that scientists are willing to pay for my fantastic referee reports. Finally! Thanks! I will charge €1000 for my next report. @springernature! https://t.co/TwLXErlvyB

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@goldwasser_seth Hope for you that the relationship works out better than publishing these shitty papers of yours!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@zelaznogcesar You should be proud of yourself!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@CorcesVictor To be honest! This really is the worst crap I have read for weeks. Look forward to my referee report!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@BoekhovenLab @Marcel_Swart @reviewer2 I do like puppies! For breakfast...

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@DebbyHerbenick @Marcel_Swart @AcademicChatter @3_reviewer @reviewer3 I would never trash your crappy manuscript in that way. All my arguments are valid. I still do pity the poor reviewer #1 who had to drag himself through your terrible manuscript.

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@jenheemstra I think you forgot a few of my essential papers. That was an easy reject!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@sexinnature No need to read this!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@kg_kritika @AcademicChatter You go! Trash that crap!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

Weeeeelllll, anyone interested in following a course on trashing crap manuscripts by looser researchers the best and most hurtful way?....

[Xia Yang Lab UCLA @YangLabUCLA]

Am sure many will agree with the opinion here - there is no reason to be mean when reviewing others' work. Be constructive, courteous, and reasonable to our fellow scientists, and promote a more positive academic culture.
Don’t be a prig in peer review https://t.co/J95NuMZxoO

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@christo71213435 @DirkScheffers @ceptional This is highly offensive! I spend a lot of time carefully reading and trashing horrible manuscripts submitted by wannabe researchers like you. I bet you never spend more than 45 minutes on writing one of these manuscripts. I take my job as a peer-reviewer VERY seriously!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@jmasterbell @chazbvb09 I will be happy to review it!

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@paoloroseano Reviewer 3...

[Reviewer3 @Reviewer__3]

@JJSabatini @AcademicChatter Amen! I stand by my words.