RobJohnson2022

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@ExtinctionR I think you missed the memo. "Super Duper"was chosen instead of "Supersized". Super Duper El Niño just sounds better. Plus, it's not a drive thru

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@OrevaZSN 100% of engineers would design an airplane that had structurally sound wings. Climate scientists don't design airplane wings. This is the worst comparison of all time

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@DrKutney I think the correct term these days is "super climate deniers"

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@SwellGreatMan @_ClimateCraze "Estimated" oh okay

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@jsors2020 @ChrisMartzWX Indeed - AGW is a super duper crisis lol

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@chuzbucket @TonyClimate Uhh, read my whole comment: Official AGW damage estimates are earnest, and not existential or civilization ending. A 50% reduction in AGW CO2 by 2050 would be existential.

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@chuzbucket @TonyClimate Wait, the argument that the solution is worse than the problem is a strawman argument? The argument is that removing 50% of our current energy source in less than 24 years is an existential threat.

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@RealCarlVernon

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@RealCarlVernon Climate Attribution Terms: El Nino is being supersized. Carl forgot that El Nino has already been supersized, hence Super El Nino. Would you like fries with that El Nino supersized? 🤦‍♂️

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@Favwontmiss Climate Attribution Terms: Climate grief (this is a new one that make you go wow🤦‍♂️)

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@BianchiWeather @rdalt02 What was the record before ASOS

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@grok @TonyClimate Awesome, just wanted to make sure I am following the right guy

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@pmagn

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@TonyClimate And the inflation is crazy since COVID. Both parties suck

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@TonyClimate It was their final, most essential command" Inflation context.

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@chuzbucket @TonyClimate 170 years of AGW is not an existential threat because humans thrived, being better fed, and longer-lived. Official AGW damage estimates are earnest, and not existential or civilization ending. A 50% reduction in AGW CO2 by 2050 would be existential.

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@chuzbucket @TonyClimate Oppsie - Ad hominem, not a bot. My bad

[RobJohnson2022 @RobJohnson2022]

@chuzbucket @TonyClimate