It was understood that a Republican POTUS would never win the popular vote. Hence why Democrats wanted to abolish the electoral college. All it took was Elon buying X, to allow real news and debunking of hoaxes, and Trump sails to a pop vote win. This is a right wing country.
The massive influx of visitors for the World Cup has been a great reminder that “immigration” as such is not a problem, neither is “mass immigration”, the problem has been solely one of bad, no-good, low-quality, very ugly people coming in.
I know a Polish woman who said when she came to the US everyone seemed dumb and excited, like a golden retriever. She found it obnoxious.
Then years later she went back to Poland and everyone was so negative and thought nothing would ever get better. And she missed America.
There is a huge info op brewing by Big Tech. I don't know who is behind it or what it will be. But I'm seeing the table being set and certain people trying to cozy up to MAGA adjacent media. Stay wary of newcomers.
Dear New Philanthropists
Most 20th century institutions are unfit for 21st century problems. Will this generation’s winning innovators build new ones, or get hoodwinked by the old ones?
Why are most wealthy people not bolder with their philanthropy?
And, five levels of giving:
You have a net worth of $232.7 million.
You can afford to write 77,500 families $3,000 checks.
Why is it always my money and never your money you want to hand out?
JD will be better served by shedding the albatross of people who funded the 2020 summer riots, but then “saw the light” once the Hamas Marxists set their eyes at others. Nobody needs these “former Democrats” interloping. Let them go hang out with AOC and Mamdani.
To those asking why Israel is losing the right.
Have you tried being nice?
Do you ever ask yourselves, "How can I improve the lives of people on the right?"
I never got anything except a lecture.
Beyond sick of the whining and entitlement.
@LabLadyV@BowTiedBroke@NickoSysa True, but surgery is intense. Wasn’t worth it for one tooth and didn’t want to ruin 2 other teeth for a bridge. Like you said pick your poison. 🤣
Also no way we could afford an implant.
We could end the alpha-gal debate tomorrow.
Military serum banks. Academic biobanks. Blood drawn in the 1970s and 80s, sitting in freezers right now.
Test it for alpha-gal antibodies and you know whether this disease is new or only newly seen.
That study has not been run. Ask yourself why.
Only 10 state @GOP parties have medical freedom as a legislative priority. Texas used to be on this list, but no longer.
No one can escape the system, and without protections, you could be the next victim.
- Idaho
- Montana
- North Dakota
- Utah
- Wisconsin
- Minnesota
- South Carolina
- New Hampshire
- Indiana
- Kansas
Annual mammograms are recommended as "preventative" care for women over 40.
Even for women who have no family history of breast cancer.
We don't even need a doctor's order. We can just call and make an appointment to get one done, and our insurance covers it.
So, many women who have no family history follow the "preventative" care guideline and subject healthy breast tissue to radiation year after year. Sometimes doing it every six months.
I understand that mammograms have detected breast cancer early and helped save lives.
But, due to the radiation, it is believed that with repeated mammograms, out of every 1 woman saved from cancer, 9 women will develop breast cancer.
Women who would've not developed breast cancer at all had they not gotten the mammograms.
That is the risk women take. And the more mammograms a woman gets, the higher the risk.
I had a mammogram once. They told me that they saw a few very small "spots" on one of my breasts.
They said that my tissue was too dense and they needed to do an ultrasound to "get a better look."
If the ultrasound gives them a better look and it doesn't subject me to radiation, why not do that to begin with?
They did the ultrasound and told me the spots were nothing to worry about, but they wanted me to come back in 6 months for a repeat mammogram.
I asked, "Why a mammogram? Why not just a repeat ultrasound?"
They had no solid answer and just said that a mammogram was required before any other testing could be done.
That was over five years ago. I never went back.
I don't believe mammograms are necessary.
They disrupt healthy breast tissue, put the woman at a higher risk of developing cancer, and can give false positives, which further increases the risk of cancer by disrupting breast tissue with invasive procedures like a biopsy.
If women have a family history of breast cancer or they find a lump, etc, a mammogram can be useful.
But there are other preventative ways to check breast tissue that don't put the woman at risk of developing cancer.
The sad thing is, those other ways need a doctor's order and are sometimes not even covered by insurance unless a woman first subjects herself to a mammogram.
Was funny when people said, “you were only in the nice parts of Detroit.” Well! There didn’t used to be much of that. Way too many people would rather live in the ashes than celebrate improvement.