@Cait_Sidhee@EmJHarris2@EHamiltonEsq It’s literally the result of a regular access auditing program that has been implemented. So, no.
Believe it or not there are some details that can actually matter.
@derek_debus@grok what was the vote makeup and underlying reasoning in those cases? did the Court rely on a historical tradition in the Constitution requiring unanimous juries for criminal convictions? Was there a dissent?
@RandyEBarnett Feels like he's really cruising for a bar complaint bruising at this point. At best very trashy to publicly attack a juror, at worst deeply unethical.
@megbasham@AuronMacintyre That probably overstates his degree of animus towards Christianity. His parents were Lebanese Christians. I have yet to see him use his platform to attack traditional Christianity in any meaningful manner. That said it's true. He is a self-professed atheist.
@BlueBoxDave@EsotericCD It doesn't necessarily mean anything. The prosecution essentially gets to correct all of the contemporaneous mistakes that they made during the trial. If the imbalance was a result of bad presentation on the part of the prosecution, it won't happen again.
I just end up feeling bad for them. Every interaction is “my ideology requires me to somehow find a way to reject western axioms under the guise of rejecting axioms generally.” And the underlying truth is: “I’m deeply anxious and depressed about everything and everyone tells me the one Saving Grace is the font of all oppression.”
After I’m done being angry with them, I earnestly pray Christ rescues them from the living hell they’ve built for themselves. I can’t imagine living like that.
@ConLawWarrior A capture of a license plate with a 99.9% chance of being deleted without any human ever having viewed it, is not a search.
The case law are not unclear on this question, Mr. “Con Law Warrior.”
The recent batch… who have been exposed specifically because Flock itself had a problem with how some dirty cops were illegally using their product? The batch that are going to jail now, and who’s coworkers now understand that they’re completely f’d if they try to do the same thing?
Kinda wild that all the people who said they would never fall for a moral panic again after COVID are the ones freaking out about data centers and flock
@mtracey@PitBottomSuper And I think that might actually be Mr. Tracey’s point: It isn’t a requirement in the sense that a court has power to enforce it. Ironically it’s a requirement, violation of which causes a *non-redressable* harm.
@mtracey@PitBottomSuper Yet I don’t necessarily think that my view and Justice Jay’s are incompatible. Jay himself says courts are presumed the proper declarants of the law. JN is a reality—and an important one. Yet it can (arguably must) still be ultra vires in a judicial sense.