@EXM7777 Iโve seen and tried variations of changing Claude.md etc and it works but then not every time and basically models only read it when they decide to and basically Claude code is unfixable in its current state to not be an AI word salad that argues with you
Opus 5 sucks. ChatGPT 5.6 is great to talk to but can burn through codex weekly limits in a day. Is there any solution besides just using cheaper Chinese models at this point?
A neuroscientist at the university of wisconsin spent 30 years studying the brains of the happiest people on earth.
He found one specific neural pattern in every single one.
It had nothing to do with genetics or circumstance.
And it can be trained in 12 minutes a day.
@elonmusk Waiting for the musk post on Grok analysis finding that instead of an internal J space like Claude, they found Grok thinks in dank memes only
Breaking: Folarin Balogun will be available to play in USA's Round of 16 match against Belgium on Monday, FIFA announced.
The FIFA Disciplinary Committee has suspended the red card issued to the USA striker during their Round of 32 win over Bosnia and Herzegovina.
@MattZirwas This is exactly the kind of nuance and receipts that is most needed and why despite having team of elite docs and spending millions people like @bryan_johnson are still literally in the dark
Avoiding confrontation is single behavior that will ruin your life
You must CONFRONT. Confront your problems, confront your avoidances, confront those behaving improperly
The only way out is through. And to blast through requires confrontation
๐จBREAKING: A cognitive scientist from MIT has mathematically proven that evolution guarantees we see zero percent of true reality, that most consciousness in the universe exists without a body, and that non-human intelligences with a wider window on reality than ours can reach in and manipulate it the way a programmer manipulates a video game.
Donald Hoffman (@donalddhoffman) is a cognitive scientist at UC Irvine who has spent 40 years building a mathematical theory of the observer. His work was cited by John Wheeler in the "It From Bit" paper. He studied under Marvin Minsky at MIT, spent two decades secretly meeting with Francis Crick to study consciousness, and has nine specific mathematical conjectures on the table that would derive general relativity, quantum field theory and the Big Bang from a single framework. The top high-energy physicists in the world, Nima Arkani-Hamed and Nobel laureate David Gross, are already saying spacetime is doomed. Hoffman thinks he knows what replaces it.
This interview is the first time he has publicly laid out what his mathematical model explains about alien life, embodiment and the structure of reality.
It already derives time dilation and quantum wave functions directly from differences in observer window size. Physics has spent a century failing to solve the measurement problem because it has been looking in the wrong place. The observer has to come first, and no physicalist framework can get you there.
A consciousness with a larger observer window has access to the underlying structure of our reality in ways we can't perceive or counter. A craft going Mach 40 instantaneously in our headset could be a leisurely maneuver in theirs.
The implications for UAP and alien life are immense.
Embodiment, being locked into a body with fingers and toes as your only interface with the world, is a probability zero anomaly in the full space of possible minds. He also says current large language models are dumber than cucumbers. His new framework, the recursive trace logic, is a completely different architecture, and some of the biggest names in frontier AI have already come to him about it.
The framework has no ceiling, and the implication is a single unified consciousness exploring itself through an unbounded number of perspectives, each one capable of waking up.
Death, in this framework, is just the closing of an icon on the desktop.
Full conversation is live now.
@pizzintwatch Iโm not saying the reason Tulsi said sheโs resigning isnโt true, but I also wouldnโt be surprised if she wanted it out because she disagreed with what the administration was planning on doing that may happen sooner rather than later
Past tech replaced narrow tasks but kept humans as the irreplaceable thinkers who created new jobs. AI is different: it automates cognition itself โ the engine of adaptation and innovation.
For the optimistic view to hold, we need broad AI ownership, real transition support, and honest answers on what humans uniquely provide when AI outperforms us on most tasks.
History helps, but ignoring the risk of structural displacement doesnโt.