Sander de Wit

Independent cybersecurity & cloud professional

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@UK_Daniel_Card I think the Dutch government motivates the same items https://t.co/5iZRo0Wfqk as ai notice I passed all the checks already. https://t.co/GY2qOGpmyX also checks dane/dnssec

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@gcaughey that fits my ps module for msix (aimed for testing/fixing msix installers based on existing win32 installers). https://t.co/yQIAsPPbvM or install-module msix

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@NickInformation that looks interesting. I’ve just updated my msix ps module as well. still need to quite a bit but I like my win11 sandbox integration. install-module msix

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@_dirkjan what does it do if json bulk requests are used against the graph bulk endpoint to run them in parallel?

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@IAMERICAbooted the interesting part is, a gdap relationship can have privileged admin that never expires but not global admin (than it needs to expire)

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@MarkSimos great, when will we be able to create multi-tenant EntraID (scim-enabled) apps again. as currently that is 'paused' due to this initiative.

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@richardhicks my point exactly, threat it like a token/session

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@UK_Daniel_Card forgot the easy integration with app control for business and all executables signed (via cat inside package)

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@UK_Daniel_Card its odd the industry doesnt adopt msix more. some of the pros: * update while in use. *download only changes not entire package, *ready for app isolation, *support app attach. etc

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@UK_Daniel_Card awesome, still play this sometimes

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@EricaZelic it has potential but configuration issues are all too common with pp. I’ve seen many customers accidentally creating bypass issues and misunderstanding their entire mail flow. Exchange does risk management a bit better

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@UK_Daniel_Card the amount of issues found in proofpoint configs that are often reviewed by proofpoint support has been mindblowing. while the product might be fine, the quality of the generic implementations is far below common quality standards in the industry

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@UK_Daniel_Card That will fit nicely with my new physical vm's in 19" rack.

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@vxunderground let’s try

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@vxunderground @cyberwarfarelab awesome

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@vxunderground @MalDevAcademy that would be nice

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@janbakker_ never mind, been a long week :-)

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@JasonSandys @AxelGauliard @IntuneSuppTeam @JasonSandys is that a known issue? as I was under the impression it would be available until December

[Sander de Wit @Sander_deWit]

@JasonSandys @AxelGauliard @IntuneSuppTeam @JasonSandys that documentation is pretty scary. basically says to manually remove the policy which in case of signed policies would brick a device. better to keverage dgss to sign a new policy to has defined trusted signing as allowed. speaking of which seems dgss doesnt work