@georgebsocial There's no friction here - so nothing is going to seem valuable to the users. So nobody is going to pay for anything. You can't monetize a slop farm.
@LanaElys If any process can be simulated to any degree of fidelity, then the distinguishing characteristic between consciousness and simulation of consciousness can be no more informative than a random number generator.
My security posture is to reject installation of any packages published after 5/1/2026 (direct deps and transitive deps). So far this has been an effective security posture. I think I'd recommend it to other teams as well.
The pope's encyclical has hit the timeline like a thunderclap. Like Churchill before him and Lincoln before that, he has deposited a clean and sturdy moral assessment on top of a shifting and tumbling earthquake of motives, factions, and opinion. He has transformed a volatile and dangerous situation into a moral stance. Without lapsing into dogmatics or shrill screeching, he has exposed technocratic rule as a fascistic anti-humanism.
@SocketSecurity We need capability-based package installer.
Installing a package should present the user the permissions/capabilities the package would access (thinking of Deno but at install time).
@QuetzalPhoenix the memory is inextricably interwoven with your age and disposition at the time, and the state of the world; things that cannot be shared with a new generation. you can never go back, and they cannot go there either, not even for a visit
let go
@JonhernandezIA This invalidates the positive moral qualities of capitalism. If individuals are no longer rewarded by the market for their unique talents, then is the suffering the system causes still morally justifiable? There's no -ism anymore, it's just capital.
@JonhernandezIA This invalidates the positive moral qualities of capitalism. If individuals are no longer rewarded by the market for their unique talents, then is the suffering the system causes still morally justifiable? There's no -ism anymore, it's just capital.