Blake Neff's "Judgement Day" 👀
On the biggest streaming night of their careers—Blakey-poo says something r3tarded & gets Charlie Kirk kicked off YouTube
You can CLEARLY SEE CHARLIE'S DISGUST AT BLAKE'S INCOMPETENCE just before he throws his earpiece & storms off.
Not friends.
You’re trying to tell me that the team who conducted UVU’s independent review of the day Charlie Kirk was killed couldn’t get a response from A SINGLE TPUSA affiliated person it tried to reach, despite calls, emails and even certified letters?
But Andrew Wilson got a response from TPUSA right away because he “sent a nice email”?
TPUSA looks TERRIBLE. People I would not want to be right now (in no particular order): Maycee Crofts, Brian Harpole, Dan Flood.
Okay, actually, that's a pretty good order.
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO
▪️TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU
▪️TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
▪️TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND
▪️TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH
▪️TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG
▪️BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE
▪️TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION
Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review:
1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections
2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements.
3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.
4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3—only one week before the event.
5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including:
▪️lines of sight;
▪️elevated positions and rooftops;
▪️building access;
▪️Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure;
▪️communications;
▪️staffing;
▪️emergency response;
▪️medical contingencies;
▪️emergency egress;
▪️post assignments; and
▪️who was responsible for which security function.
The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand.
Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur.
6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it.
7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
There isn’t a Department of War propaganda campaign from the gates of hell that can undo what I am reading.
It’s over for Turning Point USA. The most damning part? They refused to participate in the independent review while publicly lying about what took place. They lied repeatedly and publicly.
I am thoroughly disgusted with Erika Kirk.
All of this information was at her fingertips and she attempted to be a helpless widow while allowing her employees to publicly lie.
Link coming soon.
If you’re not getting it yet- TPUSA told us the local chapter asked to host the event.
Turns out that was a lie- TPUSA headquarters reached out to the UVU chapter to specifically tell them to ask to schedule the event specifically for that time and location.
The subtext is that this aligns with it being a planned assassination. You would need to pick the time and place- and TPUSA has told us for a year now that the kids at UVU requested the event so how could it be a planned assassination.
Turns out someone in TPUSA picked the time and place. And then they lied about it publicly for a year.
Yeah. That’s extremely damning.
Like asking your husband why his location was showing at his exe’s house last night and he says
“oh I was out with the guys and Joey works with her and needed to swing by to pick something up. I didn’t even go inside obviously”
And then you find your husband texting his ex planning to go over there yesterday for a drink.
So A - why are you going over to your exe’s house and B- why are you lying about it.
And C- the fact you lied about it for a year makes the answer to question A look pretty obvious.
Baron Coleman (@baroncoleman) claims Google Trends showed searches for Tyler Robinson before Charlie Kirk was killed.
Then he started looking up other names connected to the case. He says that’s where it got stranger:
No, Matt. That is literally not what is happening here, at all.
We face dark times in this country because of men who deem themselves influencers who do not bother to read through court filings but insist on fashioning an opinion based on out-of-context clips pertaining to complex matters of litigation.
This particular clip you are citing is merely a response to the state’s arguments that Charlie was killed because of his religious/political beliefs— and the extremely relevant pair of “sentencing enhancements” that the state is seeking accordingly.
The defense lawyer is engaging in the state’s arguments and demonstrating why he believes they failed to prove them even under the given hearsay standards. He is not “justifying political assassinations” nor are you dumb enough to believe that’s what he’s doing.
Again, sentencing enhancements were argued extensively throughout the filings.
If you want to have an opinion about this case, please make a respectable one; engage in the discussion honestly.
At the very least, read through the filings and stop regurgitating talking points.
@MattWalshBlog I was a fan until about a minute ago, but why lie about this clip? You obviously didn't even watch it. Are you being told to push this nonsense?
My message to @paramounttactcl who has repeatedly removed me from spaces, called for @MrsErikaKirk to sue me, and refuses to have a conversation after I destroyed him in a 1v2 debate vs him and @BlakeSNeff
This is The Woke Right.
Debate is here ⬇️
https://t.co/jwN3XmRX2S
@nosoup4knowles List three she’s released that contradict his public statements. Unless you want a laundry list of things Charlie said that are critical of Israel, pick a different topic.
Hey @BlakeSNeff— can you please respond to let people know why Tarryl didn’t hand the SD cards he took from the crime scene over to the SBI or why he appears to put the SD card in his pocket followed by popping it into his computer — within about 10 minutes of Charlie getting hit.
Was the footage edited?
Seems like a very odd thing to do in the immediate aftermath.
Also while I have you, you certainly made the public believe that after calling your mom you guys hightailed it to the hospital after. But that’s not exactly true, is it, Blake?
Do you remember what you did?
Did a panel with Andrew Wilson on Piers Morgan. What struck me was how transparently he masks ignorance with obnoxiousness and arrogance.
He gets absolutely cooked here, of course. If he had an ounce of dignity or self-respect, he’d disappear forever. But, of course, he won’t.
💠 I just went back and re-watched this entire Episode of Thought Crime. I had seen it before, I remember sometime around the 2024 election and since then had only seen shorter specific chopped up clips… ⤵️⤵️
✅ This whole EPISODE is a look back at exactly just HOW MUCH CHARLIE ADAMANTLY SUPPORTED CANDACE!!
❎ And those guys never stood up WITH him the way the should have and you can clearly it bothered Charlie. 📮 Besides the viral clip of Charlie giving @benshapiro the read down that Candace doesn’t “take” money from him, she “makes” money for him and she “earns” her money from him… ⤵️⤵️⤵️
📮 There are SEVERAL other instances where he purposely chimes in or interjects to make it a POINT TO SPEAK UP IN AGREEANCE WITH HIS FRIENDS CANDACE & TUCKER (the second segment is covering Tucker and Candace’s interview) and the last segment is about Elon Musk.
🚨 I want to draw your attention to… (at the very beginning of this clip) someone in the chat says (we can’t see it) something about when Candace and Tucker recorded…
🚨 Maybe implying nefarious or purposeful intentions (I assume) and Charlie stops mid sentence to clear it up and verify IT (whatever) WAS NOT TRUE AND HE KNOWS IT FOR A FACT! 🚨 Possibly because HE TALKED TO CANDACE AND TICKER REGULARLY (especially during this time).
🚨 His demeanor notably goes from playful to serious in defense of HIS FRIENDS!!
⌛️ It’s been so long (feels like longer than a year) since we’ve seen @JackPosobiec and @tylerbowyer dare to publicly vocalize a reasonable “THOUGHT CRIME” that I forgot they haven’t always been total fed slopping warmongering snakes 🐍 @BlakeSNeff again has always been an annoying, whinny zionist suck up cuck twat.
🗓️ It says, this was March 2024… So it’s
5 months after Oct. 7th and heading into the period where Candace shared the texts where he’s giving her a heads up that “they” were targeting her and collaborating in an attempt take her (career) down. @TheoVon@Ryanmatta@realstewpeters@MuppetMasher@JohnMappin@CarriePrejean1@TuckerCarlson
💠 I just went back and re-watched this entire Episode of Thought Crime. I had seen it before, I remember sometime around the 2024 election and since then had only seen shorter specific chopped up clips… ⤵️⤵️
✅ This whole EPISODE is a look back at exactly just HOW MUCH CHARLIE ADAMANTLY SUPPORTED CANDACE!!
❎ And those guys never stood up WITH him the way the should have and you can clearly it bothered Charlie. 📮 Besides the viral clip of Charlie giving @benshapiro the read down that Candace doesn’t “take” money from him, she “makes” money for him and she “earns” her money from him… ⤵️⤵️⤵️
📮 There are SEVERAL other instances where he purposely chimes in or interjects to make it a POINT TO SPEAK UP IN AGREEANCE WITH HIS FRIENDS CANDACE & TUCKER (the second segment is covering Tucker and Candace’s interview) and the last segment is about Elon Musk.
🚨 I want to draw your attention to… (at the very beginning of this clip) someone in the chat says (we can’t see it) something about when Candace and Tucker recorded…
🚨 Maybe implying nefarious or purposeful intentions (I assume) and Charlie stops mid sentence to clear it up and verify IT (whatever) WAS NOT TRUE AND HE KNOWS IT FOR A FACT! 🚨 Possibly because HE TALKED TO CANDACE AND TICKER REGULARLY (especially during this time).
🚨 His demeanor notably goes from playful to serious in defense of HIS FRIENDS!!
⌛️ It’s been so long (feels like longer than a year) since we’ve seen @JackPosobiec and @tylerbowyer dare to publicly vocalize a reasonable “THOUGHT CRIME” that I forgot they haven’t always been total fed slopping warmongering snakes 🐍 @BlakeSNeff again has always been an annoying, whinny zionist suck up cuck twat.
🗓️ It says, this was March 2024… So it’s
5 months after Oct. 7th and heading into the period where Candace shared the texts where he’s giving her a heads up that “they” were targeting her and collaborating in an attempt take her (career) down. @TheoVon@Ryanmatta@realstewpeters@MuppetMasher@JohnMappin@CarriePrejean1@TuckerCarlson
@RealCandaceO 🚨Charlie wanted to invite anti-Zionist Candace to join anti-Zionist Tucker at AMFEST 2025.
He was headlining anti-Zionist Tucker for AMFEST 2025.
Charlie was gonna turn Turning Point USA into an America Only organization.
Erika has now replaced Tucker with Ben Shapiro.
‼️🇺🇸: "Protecting Mrs Erika Kirk" Zionist/FEDslop Doxxing Group Chat EXPOSED 👀
Zionists & FEDsloppers coordinated pile-on attacks of anyone questioning the narrative via X group chats.
They shared @RealCandaceO home address, targeted mass-reports, & shared background checks.