@gpb20800@JohnCleese The King's constitutional role means he's excluded from having an opinion. That's how democracy works.
He can only step in, theoretically, if the government break the law.
@Muhamma82093868@gracious3105@MasterMaliq Your argument betrays your ignorance on the thing you are arguing. You are say "Try choosing to be a soldier and refusing to wear a uniform or try choosing to be a fireman and refusing to put out fires". Your argument is nonsensical.
@Long485051Dick@jdleggcan@jamespriceglos Yoir reply to the previous post is fallacious. Britain has never been a gun-carrying nation. Using a gun even before the law change in 1997 would have got you serious jail time.
@moneyuhu2000@EnglandExtra Argentina cheating their way to the final, then being embarrassed by Spain and losing their shit at the end like a bunch of self-entitled kids. Marvellous advert for the sport. Bravo!
@IsmailYamah@realMaalouf This is a fallacy twice over. It's like saying "if soldiers have machine guns, then everyone should have them". Also, Islam isn't a race.
@ALHASANALS60652@realMaalouf This is factually untrue. Even if it were too, it's a fallacy called 'whataboutism'. But you likely know that. You're just hoping your audience doesn't.