@docwalker0676@YouTube FBI claims 'Terrorists did it'.. an 'alleged' Navy 'whistleblower' saysm "navy did it. They Both can't be right! There are letters, FOIA's and Public records and a court tech never before ackn. [as nobody really wants the truth!] But if you want it! [Spreaker/aaron sheets]
@Going4it_CB@MelKShow@jackcashill A Target AV- Missile Impact, sadly ended the flight.
In Google: [ 9-18-06 National- Law- Journal Ray Lahr ]
In Google: [ Spreaker/aaron sheets ]
SHEETS was a Court Technical Consultant on this.
@MelKShow@jackcashill The case is solved, so why do these people keep rehashing the old theories?? WHY?? They have been parroting for 30 years now, the same thing, over and over! and still want people to believe their nonsense.
@xAviation That is such Nonsense. The tank never exploded and the front never came off like that and then that Half the plane kept on flying. A Target AV- Missile Impact, sadly ended the flight. In Google: [ 9-18-06 National- Law- Journal Ray Lahr ] In Google: [ Spreaker/aaron sheets ]
@dukesadog1@BuzzPatterson Here we go again. Try another angle? Judicial watch says a terrorist, and the So-called whistleblower says the Navy did it. Who to believe? They both can be right. And NEW books and vid's 'keep popping up', yet they are all wrong! This has got to end.
@MelKShow ''Long Island iced tea''? after 30 years, that and a navy whistleblower [alleged] is it? The ship said to have fired the two missiles was in port that night in Mayport Florida. And the 'WB' can't show us where his ship was, after 30 years! This is really out of hand.
@TSycophant25451@paulsperry_ Ive been posting the only facts. That's the problem. The navy whistleblower is going to have to duke it out with the terrorist claims! let me know if you want the real deal, backed with FOIA and docs. [I wont hold my breath.] lol Two years, they have been out!
@Sassena73984964@paulsperry_ This is a re-direct. The facts are out, 'but'! as many people who 'can run interference', 'are' doing so! Suddenly when the bona fides are out, here comes the 'facts'?? really! everyone is like,"what to believe"?? That's the plan!! let me know if you want the boring facts.
@samanthaowen008@paulsperry_ But the terrorists have to argue with the 'so-called' Navy whistleblower! lol.. the facts are out and not exciting at all, but just the boring facts. let me know if you want {and I hate to say it...'the truth'] these people have ruined the meaning!
@walterjacobs814@YouTube more nonsense, just repackaged. Now its terrorist?? well they will have to argue with the 'so called' Navy 'whistle-blower'. so, a man-pad by a terrorist? or, a navy shoot down! Neither!! The truth is available. but its not dramatic, just the boring facts. let me know.
@deen_iii This is overreach and nothing new. The 'new' information [so they say] is based on the old terrorist story that was put to rest. It got repackaged that's all. But then! There is a Navy whistle blower! So? terrorist or navy shoot down? neither.
@willteele The Truth is out? The plane was not even "shot down" as the 'initiating' event. The Gulf was in-port, Mayport, Florida at 8:30 pm on July 17, 1996 having been under hull inspections. She got underway on the 22nd to go to Charleston S.C for an on load.
@willteele Per Public records: the GULF was in-port, Mayport from July 9, 1996 to July 21, 1996 for a 'hull inspection': then on July 22, she was underway from Mayport to S.C. for and on load. She was in port on the 17th.
@willteele As fmr Navy 'we both know' that your scenario is not true nor documented. Two missiles off the rail and no self destruct? No one after 30 yr of investigative means has found the CARR or the Gulf, on surface radar. The Gulf, Inport Mayport until July 21 then to SC for onload.
@willteele Despicable! is all that I can say. I'm not sure what your agenda is, but is a grave disservice to the Navy and then to the facts, and the families. The plane was not shot down, with the navy running.