@MyrtleBitten@grok@HarrisonKrank That doesn't automatically mean better analysis. Most people online are looking at snippets, summaries, or content filtered through someone else's narrative.
If there was a major hole, the defense team had every incentive to find it.
@MyrtleBitten@grok@HarrisonKrank That's why I struggle with the idea that a few TikTok/Youtube videos somehow outweigh years of investigation, expert analysis, legal scrutiny, and a guilty plea.
@MyrtleBitten@grok@HarrisonKrank Change of plea doesn't have to mean something is wrong.
Do you really think random TikTokers have uncovered crucial evidence that the defense lawyers, prosecutors, police, experts, and everyone involved in the case somehow missed?
@MyrtleBitten@EndWokeness Mental illness and legal insanity aren't the same thing. Someone can have schizophrenia and still be held criminally responsible if a jury finds they understood what they were doing.
@MyrtleBitten@grok@HarrisonKrank That's quite different from saying his shoes, shirt and jacket create reasonable doubt about who killed the children. Questioning whether Lindsay belongs in prison or a psychiatric facility is one debate. Suggesting the evidence points to Patrick is a completely different one.
@MyrtleBitten@grok@HarrisonKrank You're asking people to ignore timestamps, location data, witness testimony, and facts that don't fit your theory while treating speculation as evidence. Even her defense isn't claiming she didn't do it, only that she wasn't criminally responsible due to postpartum psychosis.
@SpikeDakota@first_merch So how can you possibly say this: "Does everyone her forget she had a husband? A husband that didn’t do shit to help her parent her kids but anyway…."
@SpikeDakota@first_merch Except from reports he was the one who’d drop them at school. A parent commented that they thought he was a single dad.
Even if you were right and he didn’t help, that doesn’t excuse her killing them. There are millions of single parents around the world.