Genius Ge

[Alvaro Lozano-Robledo @mathandcobb]

Btw Andreas Thom is now also wondering outloud whether OpenAI used his personal user data to train the model to find a non-sofic group...
https://t.co/6uOUNWCUHN

[Niloofar @niloofar_mire]

Privacy policies on almost all frontier model providers are insane and assuming you have ZDR or any meaningful protection, even on enterprise setting is completely false these days!

Here I'm going to name a few very arbitrary and misleading sentences in ToS of frontier labs that most ppl don't know about. This is all assuming you have already *opted-out*, explicitly of data collection. Default for all frontier models is opt in btw!!

1) the 'explicit feedback': your chats are claimed to be 'protected' unless you provide feedback! what is feedback, you ask? it's thumbs up or down to any message in the chat, or even if you pick 'which is better' response on OpenAI GUI. In that case, you have provided explicit feedback and your chat is collected and retained for *over 7 years*!

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@tonyyueyu I think Hodge is more likely true than not, and that either proving it or disproving it is currently beyond the reach of either man or machine.

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@NeZhakyh The problem here was not arXiv, it was posting it on a personal website.

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@ElliotGlazer Dude that doesn't make it not plagiarism! I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Think for a second about what ethical standards dictate here.

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

Hey @__alpoge__ this new Borisov-Gabber-Vasiu preprint suggests that an https://t.co/He83aHIar8 paper explaining the counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture drew from an earlier version of their work. Care to explain how you obtained the counterexample? https://t.co/A3YilnQABW

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@AlexKontorovich Bruh the proof has been available, in English, for thirty years. You haven't learned it because you don't care.

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@amermathsoc This statement is a pathetic capitulation to low-quality, unethical, and unverified work. The decline in standards is spreading from AI companies to the AMS. Tragic.

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@mathandcobb @yiannissak Doesn't make it any less plagiarism

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@polynoamial You don't have to look at their prompts, you probably trained the model on metadata from their chats.

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@caodongsatya You would think he would have published something on these topics if so

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@nihilunbounded @flawedaxioms He's not an idiot, he probably contributed something. You don't have to do much to be a coauthor!

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@nihilunbounded @flawedaxioms It is not appropriate to cast these aspersions on someone (Buckmaster) who has never done anything academically questionable, as far as I know.

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@TShirtnJeans2 @__alpoge__ They definitely did try those problems, they're just way harder

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@flawedaxioms Total nonsense from you

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@NeZhakyh @cguth_7 You're schizoposting my friend

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@rfurmaniak @TiCuer38887 @NeZhakyh @adntaha_ai @PI010101 You're saying that analysis can end up involving analysis?

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@deaneyang Lol this is the new "no AI was used"

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@KristapsBalodi3 @nihilbounded Super passionate about pushing buttons and not knowing anything about math

[Genius Ge @Soledad7000]

@introsp3ctor @Anthony_Bonato Certainly it's valuable, but the issue is suggesting that it was necessary to be confident in the correctness of this proof.