@SMB_Attorney The merchant can sue the freeloading consumer. If there should be any amendment to law it's adding an attorneys' fees clause to merchant claims against false-chargeback consumers. Consumers will be more careful. NY did that to alleviate freelancers getting stiffed on jobs
Just realized AI sounds exactly like Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's concurring opinion in Acheson Hotels v. Laufer (2023). Complete with "this, not that," em-dashes, and verbose explanations of simple issues. AI was trained on her concurrence. See Pg. 15
https://t.co/Xti7lU9tbL
@alwaysadblock@ryxcommar I would have to imagine a curative instruction is necessary to ensure the jury does not draw unwarranted assumptions from the prompts, unless there's an expert to testify regarding how beginners use AI and the typical prompting. A jury is not told who wrote a draft expert report.
@HormuzReport What a dishonest report of a third party report from the notorious "anonymous source". Even the Washington Post article says the "low confidence" designation was known prior to any protective measures being put into place. This is simply propaganda.
Very problematic and further evidence that @NYCMayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani is guided not by morality or an oath to represent constituent interests but religious extremist dogma that requires hatred of a particular group deemed subhuman and an end-of-days enemy 1,500 years ago
A coalition of New York City’s Jewish bar associations is accusing Mamdani of excluding Jews from his new Advisory Committee on the Judiciary.
In a letter, the attorneys say the omission follows a “troubling pattern” that has left many Jewish New Yorkers feeling marginalized.
A City Hall official said that retired Appellate Division Justice John Leventhal mentioned in the letter “did not pass our vetting process.”
@SatisFizonE It takes another level of anti-social to invest 10 years and billions of dollars to just not have to go down the block to see your friends...
This was not a decision on procedural grounds (ie, POTUS can’t do this through executive order but Congress could legislate it); it is a substantive decision that says the 14th amendment requires citizenship for those born to, among others, birth tourists or those unlawfully present in the country.
Will need either a constitutional amendment or a future court to overrule this.
Anyway you slice it, the decision is a major defeat.
The first opinion is in Watson v. RNC, the mail-in ballot case. The court holds that nothing in the federal election-day statutes requires ballots to be received by Election Day in order to be counted.
https://t.co/m8satOKkrQ
@HormuzLetter How is it not obvious that this whole thing was designed by Iran to sway public opinion against Israel. Iran knew Israel wasn't agreeing to the deal and wasn't withdrawing from the security zone
@w1nklerr Textbook copyright infringement. If you see her videos, can you please direct me to them? Would be great for business. I think I'll make more than $9,000/mth.