@seraphel_@Ancapta They all know 100 people with blue eyes, so you would think that the guru saying that they see a person with blue eyes imparts no new information. But by saying it, he makes it common knowledge, which changes things. Making the gayness common knowledge could be dangerous.
@NordicRest@Felagoth1@anishgiri The diagram is from 1982 and was drawn by Botvinnik. Probably you're right it's showcasing pseudolegal move generation. But it's not a good visualisation of how the human brain has to evaluate as the 2025 paper someone else linked claims.
@NordicRest@anishgiri In general, the statement that a computer has to generate illegal moves to see if they're illegal is not true. Of course you're right it's common to generate pseudolegal moves because moving into check is not trivial to check.
@Fintech03 >he spent the rest of his time reading/walking/simply sitting in silence.
Poincarรฉ was a mathematician. Sitting in silence IS working. There were not a thousand menial tasks to be done. This is vastly different than scrolling reels and working as a webdev for only 4 hours.
@erikcorry Programming would hypothetically uniquely be the thing they had to be good at for the singularity. Recursive self improvement was always envisioned as being driven by self-coding agents.
@erikcorry Note:
The most popular protein powders are made with whey, and the worst ones here were plantbased protein powders because the parts of the plant that are concentrated contain lead. The two worst measured were mass gainers/meal replacements, which is different than protein powder