@IjazTheTrini Mr. Ijaz, you have done great things to the ummah; however please understand that twitter audience are not students of knowledge, and please also tell them that doesn't mean he's a disbeliever.
@Cross_Roads1968@KhalilAndani Granted, these 4 names point to 1 meaning with some small differences, hence this goofy, disrespectful argument of 99 attributes is wrong; for we also say that God's names aren't limited to 99, and not all these 99 names point to distinct attributes
@Cross_Roads1968@KhalilAndani an example would be these names of God: Al Bari, Al Khaliq, Al Fattir, Al Mussawir; all of these return to one meaning which is creating; creating itself is just an attribute of action (ุตูุฉ ูุนู) not an attribute that returns to God
@InspiringPhilos โIf it is said that whatever requires a cause, an agent, or knowledge requires a determiner, whereas whatever requires none of these requires no determiner, then this is a complete and intelligible statement.โ
- Ibn Taymiya
@InspiringPhilos First of all, that only some may God forgive hold; secondly, you brought the worst form of this argument; above all, it's begging the question, for God doesn't need a specifier; for he -exalted is he- is the only specifier/willer
@QalbFeed@AnalyticalTaymi true; no one said it does, but it proves that that interpretation was found in the generation of the companions; who will understand the quran better than we all ever will today, and even with that; his and his student's argument for it are great from Allah's mercy
Thereโs a salafi woman on here who is probably going to leak my dm of me begging her to marry me.
I thought itโs best I confess before she exposes me.