This is trivially easy to explain when you understand that feminism is a supremacy movement
Women only have one form of power over men - the ability to leverage their sexuality and decide who can have sex and who can't
The Korean 4B movement is simply that - "Give us this large list of what we want, at the expense of productive men, or we close our legs"
Women losing access to this eliminates all their power and naturally produces patriarchy. Every society on earth mandated female modesty in order to produce this, which ironically produces better environments for women because women don't actually know what they really want
Note which values are the top of the feminist hierarchy - the ability to be a whore, the ability to abort a low quality man's child, the ability to severely punish rapists (or men who don't commit after sex)
All of these undermine female sexual power
Societies collapse when this is permitted because patriarchy is the only system that channels women into pro-social behavior
Thinking you can get boys to empathize with women by forcing them to read chick-lit is like thinking you can get dogs to turn vegan by forcing them to eat carrots. You'll just end up making them hate your guts.
Women’s victim status has evolved into an independent source of social power. It persists regardless of whether actual inequalities still exist. It enables women to claim and perpetuate moral authority, institutional attention, preferential treatment, and political privileges.
"Offenders who killed men received shorter sentences than those who killed women. As the table shows, the average sentence when the victim was male was 17.5 years, compared with 22.4 years when the victim was female."
https://t.co/8hjFM0N1Bx
"The 8 year old sexually assaulted me!"
This whole conversation really is just edging towards "if a woman is caught raping a little boy it's the little boy's fault."
Woke 2.0 moral panic since Aug 2026
1. Lindsay Clancy (heroic child-strangler)
2. Cornell's orgy girl + mob of loons
3. Kristin Knouse (MeToo'd a MIT scientist)
4. Russell Brand hysteria
Remove due process; dehumanize men & boys; and minimize female misbehaviour. It's feminism.
Penchez-vous sur toutes les filières sélectives de Parcoursup et vous verrez les femmes avantagées à un point inimaginable alors qu'elles profitent déjà de dossiers surnotés pendant toute leur scolarité, un traitement de faveur qui continue dans le supérieur.
Symphonic orchestras implemented blind auditions because they are fair and eliminate biases.
When this didn’t produce the fashionable mix of token races liberals wanted, establishment press like @nytimes tried to dismantle it:
Women are the large majority of college students, and university employees. Women runs vast swathes of society: legal system, education system, healthcare, civil service, publishing & the arts, etc.
The systematic expulsion of men & boys.
Okay, I'll explain:
Boys don't like weapons. They like tools. This is one of the largest gaps between men and women, and incredibly well-established. Boys are interested in "things" and conceptualize them as tools. Girls are interested in people and conceptualize them as relationships.
She thinks that we're "socially conditioning boys to be violent" which is why they're "fascinated by weapons." No. They're learning how to use tools, and hitting something with another object is about the earliest "tool using behavior" possible. Even some birds do it. Boys fascinated by UTILITY; the idea that an object has undiscovered potential to do things.
Her concerns and analysis could easily be resolved if she would bother to familiarize herself with the century of scientific literature on the subject.
This is a good example of why journalists should report instead of comment: if they actually understood things (or had the capacity to do so), they'd be doing them instead of reporting on them.
Joking or not, it’s not funny. Men get accused all the time of shit we didn’t do by women. This is also what I meant when I said I hope I never have to have a jury.