@SomeJerkIKnow@MauiBoyMacro Indeed, I study data from markets from centuries ago. My comment was specifically about being careful about splicing together different indexes =)
@drewhahn@bennpeifert This is my take. Same as when they go on CNBC. There might be slightly more 'authenticity' here, but most of it is targeted messaging.
@VladTheInflator I don't understand your account anymore. I understand being mad at the post-GFC financial system. But you seem to just relish in pain and suffering. Oh well. Good luck out there.
@VladTheInflator Not sure why you are so gleeful about this. Do you think a homeless American couple will buy this and get off the streets? Or what is your big picture view on this kinda shit?
@MariGO2thepolls It's a terrible idea that will push people towards even more predatory lenders. We've got about 800 years of historical evidence on this one.
@musksanazi@dumbahey @WikiBias2024 Yes, I specifically noted in another comment that noting the country name appears to be peculiar to European teams and is not common elsewhere.
@dumbahey @WikiBias2024 Nope, they don't say England/Scotland/Wales or their province for the ones I checked. I did notice the EuroCup ones state the country, but that seems to be a minority of the basketball teams I checked and unique to Europe.
@WikiBias2024 @dumbahey Again, I'm just saying that in many places it is standard to only mention the city and not include the country. So by itself, this is not proof of antisemitism or a cause to ban the editor. If you have other examples of this editor having biased changes, that's a different story.
@WikiBias2024 @dumbahey Huh? I'm not saying you're right or wrong about the editor. Just noting that various sport team locations have odd conventions on Wikipedia and this by itself isn't proof of antisemitism from the editor.
@RichardHanania I believe that the actual statistic is that amongst black students, 60% of MA degrees are awarded to women and 40% are awarded to men... Her degree clearly not in a field involving statistics, critical thinking, or clear communication.
@atomicjoy@s8mb@aljhlester True, but as a professional historian, I think it's best to assume incompetence rather than malice when it comes to a fellow academic's work unless I have a good reason to think otherwise.