Here is my personal warning.
Anthropic and OpenAI have committed to spend trillions; a huge amount of US GDP.
They drive most of the AI capex boom, which again itself is a massive slice of US GDP.
Their revenues are unlikely to grow fast enough to pay for those contracted commitments.
Bankruptcies are probable and the AI capex industry is heading for a savage correction.
Hyperscalers will take large write-downs. Data centres will financially evaporate.
None of this means AI use is going anywhere. AI will remain a sensational force in everyday life.
Be careful what you own. Be mindful of your risk exposure.
Here is my personal warning.
Anthropic and OpenAI have committed to spend trillions; a huge amount of US GDP.
They drive most of the AI capex boom, which again itself is a massive slice of US GDP.
Their revenues are unlikely to grow fast enough to pay for those contracted commitments.
Bankruptcies are probable and the AI capex industry is heading for a savage correction.
Hyperscalers will take large write-downs. Data centres will financially evaporate.
None of this means AI use is going anywhere. AI will remain a sensational force in everyday life.
Be careful what you own. Be mindful of your risk exposure.
There’s little value in trying to convince you that a net-net stock is a great business. Usually, it isn’t. Most are mediocre. Some are outright poor.
But the goal isn’t to buy great businesses. It’s to buy businesses worth considerably more than their share prices suggest. Very few other approaches offer that, and the long-run practitioner record backs it up.
You don’t need excellence when the price assumes disaster.
A few of my favourites:
🪑A furniture maker that spent years treading water on a P/E of around 3. Private equity eventually bought it at a 70% premium.
👕A clothing manufacturer with so much inventory I doubted it would ever work out. It did. The company went private at double my entry price.
🧑💻A left-for-dead software company, priced as though nobody would ever renew again. It turned profitable the next quarter and nearly trebled over the summer.
🇯🇵Then there’s the basket of Japanese net-nets: mundane businesses delivering such remarkably consistent 20–30% annualised returns that the results were almost as peculiar as they were boring.
There are duds too. But there are enough winners like these that the portfolio does very well.
I write about them. I buy them.
Subscribe if that sounds like your thing.
There’s little value in trying to convince you that a net-net stock is a great business. Usually, it isn’t. Most are mediocre. Some are outright poor.
But the goal isn’t to buy great businesses. It’s to buy businesses worth considerably more than their share prices suggest. Very few other approaches offer that, and the long-run practitioner record backs it up.
You don’t need excellence when the price assumes disaster.
A few of my favourites:
🪑A furniture maker that spent years treading water on a P/E of around 3. Private equity eventually bought it at a 70% premium.
👕A clothing manufacturer with so much inventory I doubted it would ever work out. It did. The company went private at double my entry price.
🧑💻A left-for-dead software company, priced as though nobody would ever renew again. It turned profitable the next quarter and nearly trebled over the summer.
🇯🇵Then there’s the basket of Japanese net-nets: mundane businesses delivering such remarkably consistent 20–30% annualised returns that the results were almost as peculiar as they were boring.
There are duds too. But there are enough winners like these that the portfolio does very well.
I write about them. I buy them.
Subscribe if that sounds like your thing.
What market correction?
This net-net up 18% in two weeks since posted, following a tender offer.
Buybacks, insider buying, tender offers.
Buy cheap stocks, not the overpriced popular names.
Just heard a fairly popular podcast say they started reading Security Analysis but didn't finish it because it wasn't applicable to modern times.
And that, my friends, is exactly why it still works...
What market correction?
This net-net up 18% in two weeks since posted, following a tender offer.
Buybacks, insider buying, tender offers.
Buy cheap stocks, not the overpriced popular names.
Just heard a fairly popular podcast say they started reading Security Analysis but didn't finish it because it wasn't applicable to modern times.
And that, my friends, is exactly why it still works...