@Rad_Spinozist If anything, it seems like it'd be *slightly* more accurate (though still distorted to the point of humor) to make Omniman the philosophers in each case, and to make Mark "nothingness".
EP: Oh man, nothingness? Neat-o!
WP: Look, things either are or they ain't. And you ain't π€
@JoshuaLWatson Shooting from the hip, but I've been thinking there's an egoist (core?) aspect to most virtue ethical accounts. I think people give egoism (psych + ethical) a bad wrap.
For some reason, critics think it means you need to be short-sighted. But the ego can encompass a lot!
@JoshuaLWatson I think if I were more inclined towards Christianity, I might be closer to his side of things. But I don't feel much of a push or a pull that way. π€·ββοΈ
Intellectually interested, and I even enjoy talking and thinking about theology, but not much hangs on it for me.
@JoshuaLWatson I think I have a lot of good conversations with a Leibnizian colleague of mine. I find we're often on or near the same wavelength.
But our points of disagreement are (as far as I can tell) along the exact same lines. Necessitarianism, God/Nature pantheism/atheism, etc.
@I_Am_Lubeck I've recently got into fountain pens. I'm learning Mandarin (and already speak Japanese, I'm very rusty though). The feel of fountain pens, plus the novelty of learning new ζΌ’ε really got me excited to work on my handwriting. But different strokes for different folks. βοΈπ€·ββοΈ
@SIUChasmite "You wanna know about ethics? Well, once you proceed geometrically from God or Nature to metaphysics, epistemology, and moral psychology, then you can probably get a more adequate grasp of ethics."
"Oh btw, classical theology doesn't work the way Scholastics think it does. π"
@cyber_benton Lots of friends and colleagues of mine have referred (positively, or perhaps merely descriptively) to virtue ethics as "vibes ethics".
Vibes are important for realizing harmony, what more does someone want? π€·ββοΈπ