@JunkSavvy WHAT IS THE CERTIFIED AGGREGATED AUDITED SHARE COUNT FOR $MMTLP ??? IT’S BEEN 2 YEARS AND STILL NO SHARE COUNT??
IS THE SHORT POSITION SO HUGE YOU CANT/WONT SHOW IT???
$MMTLP
ISN’T GOING AWAY UNTIL WE GET A RESOLUTION & JUSTICE!!! @RepEliCrane@FinancialCmte
WHAT IS THE CERTIFIED AGGREGATED AUDITED SHARE COUNT FOR $MMTLP ??? IT’S BEEN 2 YEARS AND STILL NO SHARE COUNT??
IS THE SHORT POSITION SO HUGE YOU CANT/WONT SHOW IT???
$MMTLP
ISN’T GOING AWAY UNTIL WE GET A RESOLUTION & JUSTICE!!! @FinancialCmte@USHouseFSC@RepJamesComer
Not a single mainstream media outlet has reported that Citadel is being questioned over Failure to Delivers (FTDs) and n-ked short selling on $MMTLP
Why? Because it could set a dangerous legal precedent (if guilty) that would cause a massive disruption to short hedge funds way of 'doing business'.
So some new company using the $MMTLP cusip does a reverse merger 140/1, then changes their name and changes the cusip?!? Do I have this right? Illegal activity happening right in front of the @SECgov and not a damn thing being done about! #FINRAfraud goes deep on this one. RICO crimes!! I want my $%*!^@$ money! #MMTLPfiasco @FBIDirectorKash@FBI@TheJusticeDept@SecretService@DOGE@DOGE_SEC@elonmusk
$MMTLP I HAVE A BUSY WEEK AHEAD OF CALLING CONGRESS!!!
#MMTLPARMY
ISN’T GOING AWAY UNTIL WE GET A RESOLUTION & JUSTICE!!!
LETS KEEP THE PRESSURE UP…. 💪💪
@Giftsonglass WHAT IS THE CERTIFIED AGGREGATED AUDITED SHARE COUNT FOR $MMTLP ??? IT’S BEEN 2 YEARS AND STILL NO SHARE COUNT??
IS THE SHORT POSITION SO HUGE YOU CANT/WONT SHOW IT???
$MMTLP
ISN’T GOING AWAY UNTIL WE GET A RESOLUTION & JUSTICE!!! @FinancialCmte@RepJamesComer@RepRalphNorman
WHAT IS THE CERTIFIED AGGREGATED AUDITED SHARE COUNT FOR $MMTLP ??? IT’S BEEN 2 YEARS AND STILL NO SHARE COUNT??
IS THE SHORT POSITION SO HUGE YOU CANT/WONT SHOW IT???
$MMTLP
ISN’T GOING AWAY UNTIL WE GET A RESOLUTION & JUSTICE!!! @RepEliCrane@RepRalphNorman@RepJamesComer
#mmtlp
When you block them...they'll probably call you yellow....
That's it... A silly name
Best part is ..you won't even see it
Block a shill party starts now!!!!!!
How many market makers, regulatory agencies and brokers do you think are holding emergency meetings this weekend?
@palikaras@kimkep4796@anna_trades
$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH
How close to $$ are we? #MMTLP Subpoenas will produce evidence of fraud, collusion, conspiracy. THE HOLY GRAIL. Do you think the bad guys want 65,000 or more individual lawsuits all across the USA awarding $25K per share settlements and civil jail time? Your Govt doesn't !
@kshaughnessy2@palikaras Thank you, Kristen. As a veteran and a shareholder since #TRCH, as well as having invested in #MMAT and #MMTLP, I genuinely appreciate your work. You are a true journalist!
@kshaughnessy2 When you look at the crossover of BF Borgers clients: Trump Media & Technology Group $DJT, Next Bridge Hydrocarbons $MMTLP, Global Tech Industries Group Inc. $GTII, Bitech, and many others - an interesting pattern is revealed.
https://t.co/3aLI0mThJu
The security attorneys too
$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH
The judge and trustee will likely be interested in any dealings market makers, exchanges and regulators had with Bitech Technologies
(Bitech was recently renamed Bimergen Energy Corp)
1) Are financial institutions and hedge funds using Bitech Technologies/Bimergen as an off-ramp for the counterfeit shares transacted under the Torchlight CUSIP?
Those trades still need to be settled
2) Why did Bitech Technologies ( $BTTC) appropriate Torchlight's CUSIP (89102U103) in 2 SEC filings?
NT10-Q in August 2023
13D in May 2024
(that CUSIP is a single use identifier that only belongs to Torchlight)
3) Did Meta Materials Board
investigate Bitech's use of Torchlight's CUSIP?
If not, why not?
If yes, what did they find and how did they respond?
Many more questions in the posts below
@palikaras@kimkep4796@anna_trades@johnbrda
Hmmm....A 140/1 Reverse Split and a Name Change For Bitech to Bimergen
Why is this especially interesting to $MMTLP investors ?
Because in two SEC filings Bitech used the Torchlight CUSIP.
(August 2023 Bitech Filing - NT 10-Q & a 13 D filing by Bitech in April 2024
That 13 D filing is a statement of ownership and indicates
CEO Cole Johnson has 222 Million shares of Bitech)
Some questions:
1) Did the SEC /FINRA inform Thomas Lapinksi, the first Torchlight CEO, or John Brda, who became CEO after Lapinski, of the sanctions and disposition imposed by FINRA and the SEC on the two brokers responsible for placement of shares as depicted in two separate Form D filings for Torchlight.
One filing was for Montgomery Street Research LLC/Paul Pollack. ((NASAA EFDID 36294)
The other for Radner Research & Trading
(NASAA EFDID 67154 - links below)
2) Did the SEC/FINRA inform Lapinski or Brda that Torchlight was "issuer A in the disposition documents?
This is how it may connect.
A company called "Spine Pain Management" eventually became "Bitech".
Which just changed its name to "Bimergen Energy Corp" (see 2/3/2025 Press Release)
Peter Dalrymple, used to be an executive with "Spine Pain Management"
Filings show he also owned LPD Investments.
2014 Filings indicate Dalrymple and LPD Investments were both 10% owners of Spine Pain Management and that Dalrymple was also a director.
***Remember according to filings Spine Pain Management (CUSIP 84856L102) became Bitech (CUSIP 84856L102) and is now Bimergen (CUSIP 84856X205)
More Questions:
3) Did Dalrymple or LPD Investments improperly use the Torchlight CUSIP ?
4) What, if anything, did the two brokers, Montgomery Street Research LLC/Paul Pollack or
Radner Research & Trading, know about the use of the Torchlight CUSIP and placement of Torchlight shares?
(Links are threaded)
__________________
Additional Posts for Reference - July 2024
Question #2
Are financial institutions and hedge funds using Bitech Technologies as an off-ramp
for the counterfeit shares transacted under the Torchlight CUSIP?
Those trades still need to be settled
Why else would Bitech use
two CUSIPS?
And who brought the Torchlight
CUSIP to Bitech?
https://t.co/NWjEam1bvA
____________________
One more question for today -
Here's Question #3
What is Meta Materials Board of Director's fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders?
Doesn't the Board have an obligation to its shareholders to investigate Bitech's use of Torchlight's CUSIP?
https://t.co/mJVXHxU9B5
@johnbrda $MMAT $TRCH
WHAT IS THE CERTIFIED AGGREGATED AUDITED SHARE COUNT FOR $MMTLP ??? IT’S BEEN 2 YEARS AND STILL NO SHARE COUNT??
IS THE SHORT POSITION SO HUGE YOU CANT/WONT SHOW IT???
$MMTLP
ISN’T GOING AWAY UNTIL WE GET A RESOLUTION & JUSTICE!!! @DOGE_SEC@FBIDirectorKash@AGPamBondi
@Stef_carpedm@ItalianGatorade I feel for the $MMTLP shareholders. I was watching it in real time when it happened. It’s quite obvious the regulators had their thumb on the scale against retail.
$mmtlp block all bashers and keep the course..don't engage for the next 30 days...and see what happends,the other side dosent want you to have resolution