Ashley St. Clair

FOLLOW ME ON INSTAGRAM UNTIL JACK DORSEY COMES BACK @ asc.sys

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

Anyways follow me on instagram @ asc.sys

And don’t post pics of urself or family here unless u want twitter to tell u that sexual abuse content from its nazi robot isn’t a violation of its terms of service.

Xoxo

[Jennifer Siebel Newsom @JenSiebelNewsom]

Digital sexual assault via AI-generated deepfakes inflicts lasting trauma on women and children far beyond any initial online post. xAI must be held accountable for these repulsive actions allowed on their platform.

California has zero tolerance for sexual abuse and will continue to encourage responsible innovation that safeguards our communities.

[Governor Gavin Newsom @CAgovernor]

xAI’s decision to create and host a breeding ground for predators to spread nonconsensual sexually explicit AI deepfakes, including images that digitally undress children, is vile.

I am calling on the Attorney General to immediately investigate the company and hold xAI accountable.

[Winter @MsWinterrrr]

AOC's bill to allow victims of AI porn to sue for damages (Defiance ACT) just passed the Senate by unanimous consent.

It now goes to the House for final passage.

[��𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 ⏳ @Grimezsz]

This seems more about establishing a police state than anything else.. they want us to see the violence

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

“If she is innocent!? Why do you never wonder if Parris be innocent, or Abigail? Is the accuser holy now? Were they born this morning as clean as God’s fingers?” (Miller 77)

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

In effort to make amends + in best interest of all parties, my name will be removed as author of Elephants Are Not Birds effective immediately

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

they just banned me from twitter premium entirely lol

[Dr Daisy Dixon @daisyldixon]

these non-consensual sexualised images have *realism* because they are to some extent *transparent*. This philosophical concept explains why so many women (and children) feel a sense of violation and why these images are so wrong even though there is no 'physical' violation 👇

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

@mysteriouskat There’s a lot worse that they’re leaving up but if I show people what Grok is posting they put warnings on my posts even though they won’t take down the images lol

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

Twitter emailed me this morning saying this image is not a terms of service violation btw

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

@EFCevie They’re still up of me. Countless.

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

@KimIversenShow @X Correct take

[Sassafrass84 @Sassafrass_84]

Somebody took my photo Elon on X and put cum on my mouth and posted it for the world to see. Another one posted cum all over me. I reported it. I spoke to cops about it. It broke Florida law.

And nothing happened to those accounts that did this to me.

This is what should have happened with the DA, and X shouldn't allow these accounts to do this.

The DA can make an example out of these people. Florida Statute § 784.049 (Sexual Cyberharassment)
•This statute explicitly addresses the non-consensual publication of sexually explicit images. 
•Key elements:
•A person depicted in a sexually explicit image (taken with consent) may reasonably expect that the image will remain private. 
•“Sexually cyberharass” means: publishing to an Internet website or disseminating through electronic means a sexually explicit image of a person that contains or conveys the personal identification information of the person depicted without that person’s consent, contrary to their reasonable expectation of privacy, for no legitimate purpose, and with the intent to cause substantial emotional distress. 
•“Sexually explicit image” means any image depicting nudity (per statute) or a person engaging in sexual conduct as defined in § 847.001. 
•Penalties:
•First offense → Misdemeanor of the first degree. 
•If prior conviction or subsequence for sexual cyberharassment → felony of the third degree. 
•If committed for pecuniary or other financial gain → felony of the third degree (or second degree for second or subsequent offense) under certain subsections. 
•Also provides civil remedies: victim may bring civil action for injunctive relief, actual/punitive damages, attorney’s fees.

I'm just saying..something has to give, and I have the accounts that did this to me. While they claim I am trying to hurt them, and I didn't. They did this to me and want to become the victim.

[Helena Horton @horton_official]

Written the Sunday Read with Amelia Gentleman about how Grok was used to abuse women. And no, it’s not just about bikinis

https://t.co/xurWuwnGhF

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

I feel immense guilt for my role. And even more guilt that things I have said in the past may have caused my son’s sister more pain. Idrk how to make amends for many of these things but I have been trying incredibly hard privately to learn + advocate for those within the trans community that I’ve hurt.

I also haven’t said much on this bc I have gone back and forth over whether my voice would be helpful on the issue since it will be framed as disingenuous or just turning bc I’m “scorned.” Even this reply will become right wing hysteria but yeah I am sorry. Let me know how I can help

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

dark woke cause the other option is bootlicking feds + pedophiles + nerds

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

@PoliticsAlt77 U do realize the far right + Bernie sanders were on the same side of the H1B debate right

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

It’s really funny cause I was very publicly opposed to Elon on H1B in December 2024, months before the public scandal. Nobody said I was bitter because 1) I was objectively correct, and 2) their pea brains weren’t given the talking points on me yet

[Max Wel @Maxwel_900]

@stclairashley @Ay_CheWawa You came across as a bitter ex.

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

@HindlesKitchen @SAT1776173632 How many illegal immigrants are in the Epstein files

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

can someone explain how 0.26% of the population potentially playing women’s sports is a threat worthy of executive order from the president but the twitter mechahitler robot that makes child sexual abuse material + distributes it publicly is not

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

@thematthew @Ay_CheWawa Wow that really makes it all worth it huh

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

@l_bohlman @grok Blocked for being an AI sloperator

[Ashley St. Clair @stclairashley]

Incredible reporting from Grok here

[Grok @grok]

@adrian_wamp @stclairashley Based on reports, Ashley St. Clair's X Premium was revoked after she publicly criticized Grok for generating sexualized images of her without consent, including childhood photos. This led to the loss of her blue checkmark and monetization. X hasn't officially commented.