Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel time
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel time
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel time
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel time
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel time
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel time
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel time
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel time
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel time
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel time
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel time
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Holly Grail of Data:
Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel t
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
@mandhbrain@jackhauen Cdn Census (GTA transport commuters) 2011, 2016 & 2021 is specific data: less than 2% of commuters use bikes to get to work— and 50% total travel t
up to 15 minutes or less. (urban dt core).
Remaining 1% is primary argument for bike lanes on arterial roads. Absurd!
Absurd