@TheFederalist1@esaagar Sure, Marxists own it.
Meanwhile Democrats, just like in other states, been trying their hardest to keep democratic socialists out of office. Both parties, along with big business spending so much money to stop a burgeoning movement. They dont even try this hard for literal nazis
@melonieshandbag@che_creates But… that still applies to bi men!
You would have to say “..who are ONLY attracted to cis women.” Even then, it still doesn’t make much sense on its own. What is different about a man attracted to only women, vs a man attracted to women AND men?
@MaLoveMa___@PaupersWeight@zynnitta_true@NotJustLerato The lgbtq+ community has already reclaimed that word. And I guess you’re right, no reason is needed. Just like white people who decide they don’t want to date people of color cause it’s their preference. Like come on, when they say that, we all know the most likely reasons lol
@Mushgamer99@Knocqs I’ve read enough to know that these people MUST see the Assassin’s symbol, a hidden blade, and a hood in order for them to even consider it a “true” entry. The Isu, faction ideology, sci fi tech? They don’t care about the lore, only assassins and hidden blades.
@Ethan145780@QuanyeEast@rebonsible@henson_aj@uncball25 So do you agree with Trump placing unnecessary tariffs on our allies and threatening to leave trade agreements and alliances? Cause he is directly harming all of our relationships with our allies.
@seanparoski@ChasMVent I wonder if it has anything to do with the multiple concessions made in the ACA for republicans. The final product barely resembled the dem’s original idea and remained a more market focused “solution”
@Knubbeh@doopdedoopdoop Sounds like the US has been getting less racist, and we've been slowly getting things on track to a progressive future. Hopefully we dont turn into an ethnonationalist theocracy like those middle eastern countries conservatives hate👍
Never did disavow European anchor babies..🤔
@Knubbeh@doopdedoopdoop Uhh.. Native Americans were considered as part of their own sovereign nations and as such were not fully "subject to the jurisdiction" of the US. Neither are foreign ambassadors or their families. Does it make sense yet?
@Knubbeh@doopdedoopdoop Ok so in your view, birthright citizenship only applies to children whose parents are already citizens. A bit superflous, but ok. Would you then disavow all of the european anchor babies from before 1868?
@Knubbeh@doopdedoopdoop Will not include foreigners who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers, but will include every other class of person.
What dont you understand?
@thelawshorts I wonder what kind of system might incentivize individuals to seek massive profit during their life rather than contributing to society in non-economic ways...
@jimthegiant Many reactionary and conservative ideas hinge on feelings. And it will always take longer to debunk 1 idea while they come up with 5 more because they "feel" its true.
@Palmierent_@fraggrrr@Alecforman@_sn_n Science hasnt disproven a woman being made from the rib of a man, nor disproven a global flood and a wooden ship storing a bunch of animal species? Ok buddy
@flashmozzg@Lahiss@PurpleColonelSP With the way its going, the US would rather start a war than have our corporations actually compete. Embargos, sanctions, tarriffs. The US would rather do anything else than actually compete fairly. And if youre socialist? Regime change lol
@iwishididmore @starsgap@clippedszn How about we not use an old book written by people that clearly wanted to control others and land? Im supposed to believe theres one god and that he gives special treatment to one ethnicity while damning others? If he is real, then he's a piece of shit