Astro

Roman Catholic. Strict Observance Suarist. Kabab Enjoyer.

“Cognitio enim Trinitatis in unitate est fructus et finis totius vitae nostrae.”
D. Thomae Aquinatis

[Astro @ViaEximii]

“The knowledge of the Trinity in unity is the fruit and end of our entire life.” - St. Thomas Aquinas

[Avgvstinvs @aegidus0]

And because it is not pure and pagan Aristotelian philosophy — which is distinguished from true philosophy, or from philosophy in itself that we are writing, as we have professed many times from the beginning of our work and throughout its course: we shall take more care to...

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@Complutenses It's ok, when you do come back to us, we'll accept you like a brother. We're not Dominicans.

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@romamaternostra "Astro, you're wrong for [gives me the replies I myself wrote two years ago] these reasons."

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@dadomaradona "Do you know who John of St. Thomas was, Astro?"

[Astro @ViaEximii]

When I have time, I will briefly explain why I'm no longer a Thomist. Using ChatGPT and the replies I myself have used over the past few years to answer Scotist and Suarezian objections won't work on me. If they had any weight, I would not have left Thomism, so don't waste time.

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@friedbr @ThomistAnimals Fabro 👎👎👎

[Astro @ViaEximii]

“It is impossible for anyone to become a perfect theologian unless he has first laid firm metaphysical foundations.”

- Francisco Suárez, Metaphysicarum disputationum, Ad lectorem.

[Astro @ViaEximii]

People really be quoting articles I AI translated myself a year ago to try and convince me...

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@reg_pepe Wait you're a Lonerganian, nvm.

[Astro @ViaEximii]

Dominicans would condemn Fr. Luis de Molina for teaching heresy but then attribute to him things he never said or believed. He is perhaps the most slandered theologian by the Dominicans on grace.

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@gloriapatrii_ @fraenkisches @ThomistAnimals Oh so you're a Fabroist. That's fine, what you believe is exactly what I call absurd. I don't accept the esse-existentia distinction to be valid nor do I approve of Fabro's revisionism. But granting it for the sake of it, your view is equally problematic.

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@ByzCat So what is a Jew?

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@fraenkisches Yes, by no means fluent or an expert though.

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@reg_pepe Everyone's born a Suarist.

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@reg_pepe It's ok Reginald, when you do come back to us, we will accept you like a brother. Suárez never abandons his children.

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@fraenkisches @ThomistAnimals Early 2020s, It's been probably 5 or 6 years.

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@gloriapatrii_ @fraenkisches @ThomistAnimals You don't believe St. Thomas taught the real distinction?

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@gloriapatrii_ @fraenkisches @ThomistAnimals Yes. For me, that's probably the most absurd doctrine one could hold to. It has quite literally no foundation whatsoever, and there isn't a single worthy of consideration treatment from the Thomist side on it from 1400s onward.

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@MgrSebastianus Congruism is right!

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@Postulliok Then why did Palamas suck and was worse than a Muhammadan?

[Astro @ViaEximii]

@reg_pepe Anything but Augustinianism and Bañezianism.