🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦

❤️s: God, my husband, family, country. Catholic and a child saver. Military, 2A, and Pro-Life supporter. 🇺🇸 Don’t DM me, thanks.

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@MilitaryCooI Bye 👋🏼

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@RepNancyMace @GovTimWalz I only care when she’s going to be deported because nothing else matters

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@gonefishin1948 @saniyafatma1278 And if that doesn’t work, I would throw all his stuff out, including his phone, tv, game system, etc. The only things I would keep are his clothes (which he would learn to wash himself) and his bedroom furniture.

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@StuffForSisters Ain’t no way, it’s too close to Minnesota

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@CJGRISHAM @libsoftiktok @fortworthpd @CJGRISHAM - question for you. Can a city in Texas shut off all comments to everything they post on their facebook page?

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@ShannonMac80403 @libsoftiktok @fortworthpd Can they turn off all commenting? I know of a city who’s done that.

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

Female Texas Cop THREATENS to ticket a retired officer and Christian street preacher for "offensive speech"

Cop: "If someone is offended by your talking, then we have a problem..."

Man: "You're going to ticket us for 'offensive' speech?"

Cop: "Yes, I am"

This cop is blatantly violating the 1st Amendment

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@LibOrNormal @MrsErikaKirk @USBornNRaised He’s not, he’s just a whiny little liberal kid

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@Steve_R_Douglas @bennyjohnson Oh you’re from Canada, so sit this one out

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@billiewebbb @bennyjohnson @brandisiciliani Just shut up

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@bennyjohnson @TONYxTWO Does anyone think @RealCandaceO will finally shut UP? I doubt it

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@smsamford01 @ClownWorld Five Guys but they’re getting too pricey for the value

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Mrs. Owens,

You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."

He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.

You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.

You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.

You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.

You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.

You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.

And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.

Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.

So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.

Every single one failed.

I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.

The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.

I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@libsoftiktok Because he’s Muslim

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@TRobinsonNewEra @Wargamer204 A liberal from NY, I’m so shocked 🙄

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@NotTheirScript @Nursekatejohn Perfect description

[The Undercurrent @NotTheirScript]

Years ago, I knew someone who claimed that a young man killed in a motorcycle accident had been her boyfriend. She told everyone she was devastated, quit her job, and made his death the defining story of her life. I believed her initially.

Later, I learned the truth.

They had never actually dated. He had pursued her briefly, but they were never a couple. In fact, before his death, she had told mutual friends that he annoyed her and that he was a loser.

There’s a term for this: grief appropriation. It’s when someone inserts themselves into another person’s tragedy, elevating themselves into a central figure in a loss when, in reality, they played only a minor role in that person’s life.

Often, there’s a secondary gain. In her case, it was attention. It gave her a reason to quit a job she didn’t want, receive sympathy, and continue being financially supported by her parents. She even tried to enter his bedroom to collect personal belongings she claimed he “would have wanted her to have.”

She genuinely believed she was entitled to them.

The story became more elaborate over time. The more she invested in it, the more convinced she became that they were soulmates and that she was one of the primary victims of his death.

Meanwhile, his real family was left to deal with the confusion and additional pain her behavior created. His parents had lost a son. His siblings had lost a brother. Instead of allowing them to grieve, she made herself another person they had to manage.

That’s one of the cruelest parts of grief appropriation. It doesn’t just rewrite the past. It competes with the people whose grief is actually rooted in reality.

I share this because I see striking similarities in Candace Owens’ attempts to position herself as the guardian of Charlie Kirk’s legacy. Charlie has a real widow. He has real children who will grow up without their father. He has parents, a sister, lifelong friends, and colleagues who are carrying an unimaginable loss.

When someone elevates themselves into the center of another person’s tragedy, they aren’t honoring that person’s memory. They’re appropriating it. And in the process, they often make an already devastating loss even harder for the people who loved that person most.

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@TheInsiderPaper

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@_LaJanee_ 😂😂

[🇺🇸 JustAPatrioticAmerican🇻🇦 @VickyS123a]

@CatholicVote And the Democrat leadership likely took polls to see where he stood and bailed on him because they need that seat