Do you know who slows Bharat down?
Not Pakistan.
Not China.
Not even the 0.5 front.
The biggest drag is the IAS System.
In 1947, the British left.
But we kept the Architecture.
The brown sahibs of India.
And the system was built not to serve citizens.
It was to extort from citizens.
The system does not reward outcomes.
It rewards survival.
It rewards tenure.
It rewards procedural safety.
And when survival becomes the incentive,
execution becomes the casualty.
A file enters an office as a newborn.
It leaves with voting rights.
Some files are not pending.
They are deliberately kept pending.
With the "Forwarded for Necessary Action" tag.
Officer A marks it to Officer B.
Officer B marks it to Officer C.
Officer C seeks clarification from Officer A.
This is our Administrative efficiency.
The safest bureaucrat rarely solves the biggest problem.
He simply avoids the riskiest decision.
No decision.
No signature.
No blame.
Career safe.
Promotion comes with years.
Accountability never arrives.
Today, Bharat has ~5,577 serving IAS officers.
~8000 are retired.
Cost to the taxpayer?
Serving IAS cadre.
Up to ~₹6,500 crore a year.
Retired IAS pensions.
Up to ~₹2,000 crore a year.
And that is not the whole machine.
Salary.
DA.
HRA.
Government accommodation.
Bungalows and their maintenance.
Official cars.
Drivers.
Fuel.
Air and rail travel.
Hotels.
Daily allowances.
LTC.
Medical benefits.
Transfers and relocation.
Training.
Phones.
Laptops.
Office infrastructure.
Electricity.
Support staff.
Secretariat machinery.
Collectorate machinery.
Security.
Pensions.
Family pensions.
Gratuity.
The government pays to recruit them.
Train them.
House them.
Move them.
Transport them.
Support them.
And finally, retire them.
But here is the strange part.
We can calculate almost every input.
Where is the public dashboard measuring the output?
Where is the public KPI?
Which Collector reduced file pendency the most?
Which Secretary delivered the highest policy outcomes?
Which officer consistently completed projects on time?
Which officer transformed public service delivery?
Which officer remained a bottleneck for years?
Where is the scorecard?
Every profession is measured.
Businesses measure profit.
Students are measured.
Teachers are measured.
Companies are measured.
Taxpayers are measured.
Citizens are measured.
Political parties are measured.
Why are Babus never measured?
And why is their promotion guaranteed?
Now, imagine an IAS officer.
He played ping-pong with files his whole career.
One table to another.
One department to another.
One decade to another.
Then he retires.
But the taxpayer doesn't.
Why should taxpayers keep paying?
For a career never measured by performance?
The British built this system to extract from us.
And we still live under its architecture.
While proudly calling ourselves independent.
So that people in India and around the world are clear about my stand.
I am an Indian Christian. And I am not a minority in India because a Mother never distinguishes between her children.
Laws were made to make feel like a minority. Politics is played to make me feel like a minority.
But, I don’t feel like a minority and I will never be a minority in Bharat. I am a proud Son of Bharat Mata.
You really want to fight the information war? But then why don't we follow such positive channels by the lakhs??? The left follows negative channels immediately. Let's do this.
Year 1989 : Rahul Gandhi wasn't eligible for admission to St. Stephen's College, Delhi due to poor marks
Then central government declared him a shooting champion & granted him admission through sports quota
Irony-They are talking about education system
Did you know this fact?
There are 3 ancient texts from the St Thomas Tradition-
Gospel of Thomas
Acts of Thomas
Infancy Gospel of Thomas
The first book is FULL of wisdom sayings taken directly from Mahayana sources, especially the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra
The 'Hymn of the Pearl' embedded in the Acts of Thomas is a direct and audacious plagiarism of Pañcāvudha Jātaka- an Indian story about a prince of Kāsī being sent by the King and Queen to Takṣaśilā to be trained on a mission. The audacious author of the Pearl actually named this work 'The adventures of Thomas in the land of the Indians'.
The third book is a retelling of multiple infancy stories about the 'Child prodigy' from the Lalitavistara. ‘Humbling the teacher’, prodigious numeracy/literacy, giving life to birds etc.
Dear Congressman Moore, please don't use St Thomas for Geopolitics. It will horribly back fire one day when the source-critical findings of recent research become public knowledge.
The Aryan invasion/Migration Theory refuses to die.
The modified theory now holds that migrants from Central Asia arrived in India around 1,500 BC, bringing Sanskrit and Vedic religion wholesale, and that the Indus-Sarasvati civilisation they replaced was separate. There's a problem. The Rig Veda's hymns to the Sarasvati call it the mightiest river in the land, and the Sarasvati dried up around 2,000 BC. The people credited with writing those hymns would have arrived to find a dry riverbed.
Newer DNA studies are being used to prop the theory up regardless.
The primary paper, Narasimhan et al. in Science 2019, describes a small number of Central Asian males marrying into a much larger local Indian population. The popular books dress that trickle up as a civilisational rupture that rewrote India, imposed Sanskrit, and simultaneously repopulated Europe and Siberia, all from a windswept steppe with a fraction of India's demographic base.
The Rig Veda is also full of maritime references, of maritime travel, of gods with oceanic origins, and there are three-masted ships and hundred-oared vessels in its verses. Steppe pastoralists do not write poetry like that, and there is nothing in the text describing cold climates, the steppe, or a journey from anywhere else. If invaders had imposed their language you would expect older non-Indo-European river and mountain names beneath the Sanskrit layer, in the way Miami and Mississippi sit under English across the Americas. India shows no such pattern.
The newer Heggarty paper from 2023 shifts the entry route but not the frame. It uses assumptions which were on the authors' own admission "centred on the majority view." The output unsurprisingly confirms the majority view. India remains a destination in every model on the paper's menu. Out of India is not among them.
Neither describes an invasion, and neither describes a migration in the racial sense the Victorian invasion theorists meant.
A flawed nineteenth century racial theory dressed in twenty first century genetics or linguistics is still a flawed nineteenth century racial theory.
Link to full essay, with sources, in the comments below.
For me, I think Christianity can’t be true because I can never become comfortable with these tensions in that faith
1. God has only one son and will incarnate only once into one ethnicity (Jews) to save humanity but Satan deceived humanity by revealing to all nations as diverse idols and inspire an immense variety of civilisations and cultures
2. The creator of the universe ignores most of humanity for three thousand years since creation (except a group of 12 tribes in the Levant) but still the billions of humans who lived and died before 0CE will not to go to heaven for no fault of their own, whereas Satan revealed to them in the form of magnificent idols to supposedly deceive them while the creator God didn’t give a damn for those gentiles outside Israel for three millennia
3. Satan revealed himself in multiple demonic forms of multiple idols to multiple gentile nations but God would reveal himself only to the Jews and and rely on monarchic persecutions, invasions, and colonialism, to spread his true faith to the entire world outside of Judea
4. For humanity : multiple languages to describe the same world is okay, multiple cuisines to nourish the same human physiology is okay, multiple clothing traditions for covering the same body are okay, but when it comes to connecting to the divine, it is only just one God and one incarnate one time. No other way except Jesus of Nazareth.
5. God will forgive every sin when confessed and after penance (including murder) and make you get into heaven but not for idolatry (apparently a much more serious sin deserving of eternal hellfire)
Namaste, Ma'am...Aapko 1 story sunata hoon....
In the summer of 1980, a distraught 7th grade boy stood in the courtyard of a modest house in Mylapore, watching his father toss his cricket bat down a deep well. A fast bouncer had shattered the boy's spectacles during a local match & his father, a renowned Sanskrit logician, was terrified for his son's sight.
"Your cricket days are done," his father declared, handing him a violin. "If you want to master precision, master this."
The boy did not throw a tantrum. He directed his focus toward the strings, training until he was performing alongside musical legends, even taking direct corrections from Bharat Ratna M.S. Subbulakshmi.
5 yrs later, he suffered another blow: he failed to clear the IIT-JEE examination.
He did not give up. He enrolled in a regional engineering college, quietly mastering computer science logic gates. He eventually worked his way into IIT Madras as a postgrad researcher, earned a PhD, joined as a prof & eventually became the Director of the very institute that had once turned him away.
By 2011, while the world was building consumer mobile apps, this prof was looking at a hidden national vulnerability: every radar, fighter jet, banking server & defense system in India was running on foreign-designed microprocessors.
He had a single question in his mind: "We can test that a foreign chip does what we WANT it to do. But can we guarantee it does not do something we DO NOT want it to do when a war starts?"
He proposed building a completely indigenous, industrial-grade microprocessor from scratch. Global tech giants insisted it could not be done w/o billions of dollars in infrastructure & massive foreign patents.
He did not care. Working out of cramped labs on long shifts, he & his team adopted the open source RISC-V instruction set. They hand-coded logic gates, mapped silicon layouts & verified billions of instruction cycles.
In July 2018, a tiny 16mm² piece of silicon codenamed Risecreek arrived back at the lab. The team wired it up, flipped the switch & watched a flickering monitor as the Linux operating system booted on 100% Indian-designed silicon for the 1st time in history.
Today, his SHAKTI processor architecture powers everything from defense communications to space grade controllers built in collaboration with ISRO.
That young boy whose father threw his cricket bat down a well...
The student who missed the JEE list in 1985...
The violinist who turned down the official IIT Director's mansion to stay in his family home & protect his late father's Sanskrit library...
His name is Prof. Veezhinathan Kamakoti.
@junaidalirehan2 We were and we will be , today May be work in progress, It comes from our civilisation once you understand it without prejudice you can see the truth. Change your glasses……
Buddhists are friends or not - I will tell the History you decide your ideology
One of the biggest humanitarian tragedies involving Hindus in Bhutan is rarely discussed.
Between 1988 and the early 1990s, over 100,000 Lhotshampaspredominantly Hindus were driven out of Bhutan, nearly one-sixth of the country’s population.
They were stripped of citizenship, forced to abandon their homes and land, and many were coerced into signing “voluntary migration” papers before being expelled.
Most spent nearly two decades in refugee camps in Nepal. Instead of returning home, over 112,000 were eventually resettled in countries such as the United States, Canada, and Australia because Bhutan refused large-scale repatriation.
Majority converted to christian
India- the world’s largest Hindu-majority nation- had both the influence and, many would argue, the moral responsibility to stand up for these persecuted Hindus.
Yet under the Congress governments of Rajiv Gandhi and P. V. Narasimha Rao, and later the UPA government led by Dr. Manmohan Singh, India never made the return and rehabilitation of the displaced Lhotshampas a major public diplomatic priority.
While maintaining close strategic ties with Bhutan, successive Congress-led governments did not publicly press for the large-scale return of these refugees.
More than 100,000 predominantly Hindu refugees lost their homeland forever, and most were ultimately resettled in third countries instead of being allowed to return home.
One of the largest expulsions of Hindus in modern South Asian history remains one of its least discussed chapters.
History should ask why.
India was the cradle of civilisation. Not one of several.
Several people have replied to my recent essay by saying there is no single cradle of civilisation. Civilisation developed independently in Mesopotamia, Egypt, India, China and South America. Why make it a competition?
This sounds like humility, but it is the same evasive move that propped up the Aryan invasion theory for a century: when the evidence becomes inconvenient, redraw the question so no evidence can ever settle it.
Consider what would have to be true for independent emergence to hold. Indus-Sarasvati merchant seals would not appear across Sumerian cities. An Akkadian cylinder seal would not name its owner as an interpreter of the Meluhhan language. Bead necklaces manufactured at Lothal would not turn up in Queen Puabi's tomb at Ur around 2450 BC. Pre-dynastic Egyptian graves at Nakada would not contain mud brick-lined pits in Sumerian and Indus-Sarasvati style, alongside cylinder seals and lapis lazuli from the northernmost Indus-Sarasvati settlement. The Sumerian scribes would not record ships arriving from Meluhha carrying timber, copper, carnelian and cotton.
All of those things happened, and they are in the archaeological record. They have been for decades.
The "independent emergence" position has a convenient feature. No evidence can ever dislodge it. Merchant seals from one civilisation found inside another become "evidence of trade, not dependency." Identical brick ratios become "convergent development." A professional interpreter role for a foreign language becomes "contact, but not influence." At every point the conclusion is decided in advance, and the evidence is arranged around it.
Others have argued that even if the civilisations were connected, Mesopotamia was still earlier. Earliest attested writing. Earliest cities. Earliest legal codes. The crucial word is "attested," which means found and recorded by archaeologists. Mesopotamia was excavated intensively from the 1840s. Mohenjo-daro was not discovered until 1922. The site at Bhirrana, dated to 7570-6200 BC, with planned streets, drainage, standardised weights and bronze metallurgy millennia before it appears elsewhere, was identified only recently. Mehrgarh, around 7000 BC, supported 20,000 people growing wheat, barley and cotton, and trading lapis lazuli and copper beads. "Earliest attested" tells you where archaeologists chose to dig, but it does not tell you what existed first.
So at what point does evidence of connection actually count? When one civilisation's merchants are living in another's cities, boring beads with their own technology and maintaining a permanent enclave at Lagash? When the Sumerian texts record ships from Meluhha bringing wealth but never once mention Sumerian ships sailing east? When Indus-Sarasvati seals are found throughout Mesopotamia but no Mesopotamian seal has ever been found in Indus-Sarasvati lands?
And that is before the underwater evidence from the Gulf of Cambay and the Tamil coast, where sonar readings suggest ports thousands of years older than anything in Mesopotamia. If those dates hold, the question of independent emergence becomes redundant.
Treating every civilisation as equally primary, whichever direction the evidence actually points, is a kind of participation trophy for entire fields of study, not open-mindedness.
Independent emergence is where one lands once you’ve already decided not to look at what moved between the geographical boxes, or in which direction. It kept the Aryan invasion theory standing for a hundred years, and it's propping up the same evasion today.
@DanQayyum@SreenivasanJain@mehdirhasan@zeteo_news All Anti India Stars have been shown the door by the majority, they have been exposed, if there films had done well they would have continued the anti India narrative.