I'm fundraising for Leeds Hospitals Charity. Check out my @JustGiving page and please donate if you can. Thank you! #JustGiving https://t.co/N1sh7HJR1E
Here is a preview of the latest video.
This was the most unhinged experience I've personally had with an officer, none of it made sense and no other officers were acting in this manor.
@TheEnglishNed was later arrested for returning an insult to someone who had just used the same word to insult him first 🥴
Watch the full video here
https://t.co/iNP6HiWtDC
@tescomobile@SBarrettBar It’s really not difficult. Just give him his PAC code already. Also asking him to refrain from posting about it repeatedly, he’s entitled to shout it from the roof tops if he so wishes. I’ve been telling my Mrs about these issues Steven is having. She’s leaving your network asap!
The whole process behind the drafting of the Islamophobia definition — repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — absolutely stinks.
The Free Speech Union has been warning about this from the start. This was never about tackling genuine incidents of anti-Muslim hostility: existing laws already do that. It was about shamelessly courting the Muslim vote.
We exposed the troubling links between all five members of the Working Group tasked with drafting the definition and Islamist extremist organisations.
We warned that the definition would have a chilling effect on free speech. It has since been weaponised against people who have voiced legitimate criticism of Islam, its history and its practices.
Then it emerged that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government had deleted all responses to the consultation that informed the final definition.
The Free Speech Union threatened the department with a judicial review unless it revealed who had been allowed to contribute to the consultation. After a considerable delay, and having said that the responses had been deleted, the department has now admitted that they were not.
There is clearly a cover-up at the heart of Government.