@Doctor_Dray_@Falko_1@_VFDH@DefiantLs Lmao, well if you believe that “ancient” is 250 years ago then that’s on you but nobody is obligated indulge you.
@7GOATrings@Falko_1@_VFDH@DefiantLs If that’s what he wants then fine if you don’t like it fine, but don’t try and pass it off as “historically inaccurate” while also advocating for an equally inaccurate version.
@88gald88@PhilbertW86816@DefiantLs And also Shakespeares English was not even accurate to the time he wrote it, it is entirely made up, literally he made up hundreds of words. The actual accent people spoke was more like a West Country accent.
@88gald88@PhilbertW86816@DefiantLs Which is modern English and is not even remotely accurate for the time, so in fact you don’t want historical accuracy or realism you want people to speak a theatrical theatre English.
@Falko_1@_VFDH@DefiantLs And neither one is an accurate representation of how people spoke at the time. Why is one better than the other? Because people are stupid enough to believe one is authentic and the other isn’t.
@johno_in_oz@_VFDH@DefiantLs Yes they spoke modern English. Oh sorry you are ok with it not being authentic it’s ok if it is modern just not too modern right? You want it to sound a bit like you imagined even if it’s not remotely accurate to the time.
@timecode1260@Hector_McNeil@KathAntonio7@Geiger_Capital The American claim of inventing the internet is like me buying a flat pack from ikea following the instructions and then claiming I invented it because I was first. Truth is many people were involved some American others not.